Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Self-incompatibility in ryegrass VII. the determination of incompatibility genotypes in autotetraploid families of Lolium perenne L.
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 October 1984

Self-incompatibility in ryegrass VII. the determination of incompatibility genotypes in autotetraploid families of Lolium perenne L.

  • C H Fearon1,
  • M D Hayward2 &
  • M J Lawrence1 

Heredity volume 53, pages 403–413 (1984)Cite this article

  • 555 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The two locus gametophytic self-incompatibility system of the grasses entails a maximum of four different S-Z specificities in the diploid pollen of tetra-ploid individuals. It is not known for certain whether only one S-Z pair in such pollen needs to be matched by the same pair in the stigma for incompatibility to occur (hypothesis 1) or whether all such pairs have to be matched (hypothesis 2).

This paper, the first of three, concerns the results obtained from the application of the first stage of a three-stage procedure for the analysis of self-incompatibility in tetraploids. Pollen from diploids of known genotype is applied to the stigmas of related tetraploids in order to determine the incompatibility genotypes of the latter.

The results obtained from two families of tetraploid perennial ryegrass show that the 35 legitimate plants examined fell into 18 of the expected 81 different incompatibility classes, and that the gametic segregation ratios of the parents of these families were consistent with the assumption that the chromosomes segregate at random with respect to the incompatibility loci in tetraploid ryegrass. Furthermore, since it was possible to recognise plants of genotype S3456Z3456 and S3356Z3356, the alleles must act independently in the stigmas of tetraploids with no dosage effects.

Similar content being viewed by others

Phylogenomics of the genus Glycine sheds light on polyploid evolution and life-strategy transition

Article 14 March 2022

Pericentromeric recombination suppression and the ‘large X effect’ in plants

Article Open access 07 December 2023

Incompatible pollen abortion and late-acting self-incompatibility in Schima superba

Article Open access 16 September 2022

Article PDF

References

  • Ahloowalia, B S. 1977. Hybrids between tetraploid Italian and perennial ryegrass. Theor Appl Genet, 49, 229–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annerstedt, I, and Lundqvist, A. 1967. Genetics of self-incompatibility in Tradescantia paludosa (Commelinaceae). Hereditas, 58, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breese, E L. 1983. The creation and exploitation of novel genetic resources and the scope for genetic exchange. In The Utilisation of Genetic Resources in Fodder Crop Breeding. Proceedings of the Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section Meeting; Aberystwyth 1982 (in the press).

  • Brewbaker, J L, and Gorrez, D D. 1967. Genetics of self-incompatibility in the monocot genera Ananas (Pineapple) and Gasteria. Amer J Bot, 54, 611–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J L. 1961. The Pineapple: Botany, Cultivation and Utilization. Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, M A, Hayward, M D, and Lawrence, M J. 1979. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. I. Genetic control in diploid Lolium perenne L. Heredity, 43, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, M A, Hayward, M D, and Lawrence, M J. 1980. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. III. The joint segregation of S and PGI-2 in Lolium perenne L. Heredity, 44, 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G M, and Davies, E W. 1982. The dynamics of aneuploidy in an induced tetraploid population of Lolium multilflorum × Lolium perenne. Theor Appl Genet, 62, 39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, C H, Hayward, M D, and Lawrence, M J. 1983. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass. V. Genetic control, linkage and seed-set in diploid Lolium multiflorum Lam. Heredity, 50, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1947. The theory of linkage in polysomic inheritance. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B, 223, 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. 1977. Self-incompatibility in Beta vulgaris L. I. Four gametophytic complementary S-loci in sugar beet. Hereditas, 85, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M J, Afzal, M, and Kenrick, J. 1978. The genetical control of self-incompatibility in Papaver rhoeas. Heredity, 40, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1943. Physiology of incompatibility in plants. III. Autotetraploids. J Genetics 45, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1947. Competition and dominance of incompatibility alleles in diploid pollen. Heredity, 1, 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1954. Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Advances in Genetics, 6, 235–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. 1957. Self-incompatibility in rye. II. Genetic control in the tetraploid. Hereditas, 43, 467–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. 1962. The nature of the two-loci incompatibility system in grasses. I. The hypothesis of a duplicative origin. Hereditas, 48, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østerbye, U. 1975. Self-incompatibility in Ranunculus acris L. I. Genetic interpretation and evolutionary aspects. Hereditas, 80, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østerbye, U. 1977. Self-incompatibility in Ranunculus acris L. II. Four S-loci in a German population. Hereditas, 87, 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrott, C H. 1981. Self-incompatibility in Diploid and Tetraploid Lolium Species. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winton, D, and Haldane, J B S. 1931. Linkage in the tetraploid Primula sinensis. Journal of Genetics, 24, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT

    C H Fearon & M J Lawrence

  2. Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB

    M D Hayward

Authors
  1. C H Fearon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M D Hayward
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M J Lawrence
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fearon, C., Hayward, M. & Lawrence, M. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass VII. the determination of incompatibility genotypes in autotetraploid families of Lolium perenne L.. Heredity 53, 403–413 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.97

Download citation

  • Received: 16 December 1983

  • Issue date: 01 October 1984

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1984.97

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genetics Behind Sexual Incompatibility in Plants: How Much We Know and What More to Uncover?

    • Sukanya Chakraborty
    • Smritikana Dutta
    • Malay Das

    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation (2023)

  • PollenCALC: Software for estimation of pollen compatibility of self-incompatible allo- and autotetraploid species

    • Andrea Arias Aguirre
    • Bernd Wollenweber
    • Thomas Lübberstedt

    BMC Bioinformatics (2012)

  • Prospects for Hybrid Breeding in Bioenergy Grasses

    • Andrea Arias Aguirre
    • Bruno Studer
    • Thomas Lübberstedt

    BioEnergy Research (2012)

  • Gametophytic–sporophytic incompatibility in the Cruciferae–Raphanus sativus

    • D Lewis
    • S C Verma
    • M I Zuberi

    Heredity (1988)

  • Self-incompatibility in ryegrass VIII. the mode of action of S and Z alleles in the pollen of autotetraploids of Lolium perenne L.

    • C H Fearon
    • M D Hayward
    • M J Lawrence

    Heredity (1984)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited