Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Analysis of centromere co-orientation in intervarietal hybrids of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), by means of C-banding
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 June 1985

Analysis of centromere co-orientation in intervarietal hybrids of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), by means of C-banding

  • Araceli Fominaya1 &
  • Nicolas Jouve1 

Heredity volume 54, pages 367–371 (1985)Cite this article

  • 702 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The detection of intervarietal variation in C-banding pattern of meiotic 1B, 4B and 5B chromosomes in F1 hybrids of common wheat, Triticum aestivum L., permitted the analysis of interchromosomal affinity on the separation of their centromeres to opposite poles at first metaphase.

Testing meiotic configurations for centromere co-orientation, non-randomness was found, resulting from an excess of the type of distribution with the three chromosomes having the highest amount of heterochromatin going to the same pole. The centromeres that congregated predominantly together at the same pole were not derived from the same parent of the hybrids. Consequently, the predominance of that type of separation cannot be attributed to centromeric affinity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Identifying the physiological traits associated with DNA marker using genome wide association in wheat under heat stress

Article Open access 29 August 2024

Population structure and genome-wide association studies in bread wheat for phosphorus efficiency traits using 35 K Wheat Breeder’s Affymetrix array

Article Open access 07 April 2021

Major chromosome rearrangements in intergeneric wheat × rye hybrids in compatible and incompatible crosses detected by GBS read coverage analysis

Article Open access 14 May 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Bennett, M D, Stern, H, and Woodward, M. (1974). Chromatin attachment to nuclear membrane of wheat pollen mother cells. Nature, 252, 395–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M D, Smith, J B, Simpson, S, and Wells, B. 1979. Intranuclear fibrillar material in cereal pollen mother cells. Chromosoma, 71, 289–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, G W. 1966. Preferential segregation in Mormoniella. Genetics, 54, 1041–1048.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Endo, T R, and Gill, B S. 1984. Somatic karyotype, hetero-chromatin distribution, and nature of chromosome differentiation in common wheat, Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. Chromosome, 89, 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, E, Gonzalez, J M, and Jouve, N. 1984. Identification of C-banded chromosomes in meiosis of common wheat, Triticum aestivum. L. Theor Appl Genet, 67, 257–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y L. 1966. Sites of affinity and linear arrangement of genes on chromosome V of Saccharomyces. Can J Genet Cytol, 8, 677–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouve, N, Diez, N, and Rodriguez, M. 1980a. C-banding in 6x-Triticale x Secale céréale L. Hybrid cytogenetics. Theor Appl Genet, 57, 75–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jouve, N, Montalvo, D, and Soler, C. 1980b. Differential heterochromatic regions in homologous chromosomes of wheat. Cereal Res Comm, 8, 599–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelley, T, Josifek, K, and Kaltsikes, P J. 1978. Polymorphism in the Giemsa C-banding pattern of rye chromosomes. Can J Genet Cytol, 20, 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindegren, C C, and Shult, E E. 1956. Non-random assortment of centromeres with implications regarding random assortment of the chromosomes. Experientia, 12, 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindegren, C C, Lindegren, G, Shult, E, and Hwang, Y L. 1962. Centromeres, sites of affinity and gene loci on the chromosomes of Saccharomyces. Nature, 194, 260–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, K E. 1970. A test for “affinity” in maize. Heredity, 25, 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D. 1953. Affinity: a new genetic phenomenon in the house mouse. Nature, 171, 26–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D. 1955. Affinity. Proc Roy Soc, B, 144, 241–259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, T, and Lacadena, J R. 1979. Analysis of centromere co-orientation in a rye-wheat derivate by means of C-banding. Chromosoma, 73, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P A. 1959. Possible affinity between linkage groups V and XIII of the house mouse. Genetica, 29, 304–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. 1964. Cytogenetical evidence on the question of affinity in cotton. Heredity, 19, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H, and Jones, G H. 1967. Chromosome evolution in Lolium. Heredity, 22, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M M. 1942. Preferential segregation in maize. Genetics, 27, 395–407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M M, and Dempsey, E. 1966. The effect of abnormal chromosome 10 on preferential segregation and crossing over in maize. Genetics, 53, 989–1020.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, A G. 1982. C-banded wheat chromosomes in wheat and triticale. Theor Appl Genet, 63, 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sficas, A G. 1963. Statistical analysis of chromosome distribution to the poles in interspecific hybrids with variable chromosome pairing. Genet Res 4, 266–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shult, E E, and Lindegren, C C. 1957. Ortho-orientation: a new tool for genetical analysis. Genetica, 29, 58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S B, Miller, T E, and Reader, S M. 1983. Intraspecific variation in C-banded chromosomes of Aegilops comosa and Ae. speltoides. Theor Appl Genet 65, 343–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M E. 1953. Affinity: a new genetic phenomenon in the house mouse. Evidence from labotarory stocks. Nature, 171, 27–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M A. 1958. Experimental evidence for a new genetic phenomenon. Phil Trans Roy Soc B, 241, 211–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M E. 1959. An experimental test of the hypothesis of affinity. Genetica, 29, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. 1960. Possible cases of affinity in cotton. Heredity, 14, 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M E. 1961. Affinity: evidence from crossing inbred lines of mice. Heredity, 16, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M E. 1964. Affinity in cotton. Heredity, 20, 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimarck, A. 1975. Heretochromatin polymorphism in the rye karyotype as detected by the Giemsa C-banding technique. Hereditas, 79, 293–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Alcalá de Henares, Apdo. 20. Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Araceli Fominaya & Nicolas Jouve

Authors
  1. Araceli Fominaya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Jouve
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fominaya, A., Jouve, N. Analysis of centromere co-orientation in intervarietal hybrids of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), by means of C-banding. Heredity 54, 367–371 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.50

Download citation

  • Received: 16 November 1984

  • Issue date: 01 June 1985

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.50

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Cereal cytogenetics in retrospect. What came true of some cereal cytogeneticists' pipe dreams?

    • W. Lange

    Euphytica (1988)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited