Abstract
The competitive interactions which take place in genetically heterogeneous cultures of Drosophila melanogaster consist of both intra-genotypic and inter-genotypic effects. If these parameters are quantified separately they can be used to describe the way in which a particular genotype exerts competitive pressure on the one hand and responds to such competitive pressure on the other. The results presented in this paper show that a distinction can be made between the aggression and the response of a series of genotypes derived from the Texas population of Drosophila melanogaster. For most of the mixtures involved in this experiment the deviations from the mean competitive value attributable to aggression (a) and response (r) were quantified and shown to combine additively in their effect on the character pa (the proportion of eggs developing successfully into adult flies, transformed into angles) with no evidence of any interaction. The components (a) and (r) show substantial variation but the lack of any correlation in their distribution suggests that they are separately adjustable by selection. The implications of this result with respect to the action of natural selection within the Texas population is considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Breese, E L, and Hill, J. 1973. Regression analysis of interactions between competing species. Heredity, 31, 181–200.
Caligari, P D S. 1980. Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Monocultures. Heredity, 45, 219–231.
Caligari, P D S, and Mather, K. 1975. Genotype-environment interaction III. Interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Land B, 191, 387–411.
Fisher, R A, and Yates, F. 1963. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Linney, R. Barnes, B W, and Kearsey, M J. 1971. Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. Heredity, 27, 163–174.
Mather, K, and Caligari, P D S. 1981. Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Measurement of competition. Heredity, 46, 239–254.
Mather, K, and Caligari, P D S. 1983. Pressure and response in competitive interactions. Heredity, 51, 435–454.
Mather, K. Hill, J, and Caligari, P D S. 1982. Analysis of competitive ability among genotypes of perennial ryegrass. Heredity, 48, 421–434.
Papendick, R I. 1976. In Sanchez, P. A. and Triplett, G. B. (eds.) Multiple Cropping, American Society of Agronomy, Special Publication, 27, 378 pp.
Spitters, C J T. 1983a. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Neth J agric Sci, 31, 1–11.
Spitters, C J T. 1983b. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 2. Marketable Yield. Neth J agric Sci, 31, 143–155.
Willey, R W. 1979. Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Field Crop Ahstr, 32, 1–10, 73–85.
De Wit, C T. 1960. On competition. Versl Landbouwk Onderz Ned, 66, 1–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eggleston, P. Variation for aggression and response in the competitive interactions of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 54, 43–51 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.7
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.7
This article is cited by
-
K-selection, α-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: Density-dependent selection revisited
Journal of Genetics (2001)
-
The competition diallel and the exploitation and interference components of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster
Heredity (1991)
-
The biometrical genetics of competitive parameters in Drosophila melanogaster
Heredity (1990)
-
Analysis of dominance for competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster
Heredity (1989)
-
Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: recurrent selection for aggression and response
Heredity (1988)


