Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Variation in alien Lotus corniculatus L. 1. Morphological differences between alien and native British plants
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1986

Variation in alien Lotus corniculatus L. 1. Morphological differences between alien and native British plants

  • Françoise Bonnemaison1 na1 &
  • David A Jones1 

Heredity volume 56, pages 129–138 (1986)Cite this article

  • 834 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The native form of Lotus corniculatus L. in the north of Europe is a prostrate plant with small leaflets and short internodes. Morphologically different plants with erect growth habit, large leaflets, light keel petals and hollow stems have been introduced in the seed mixtures sown on new roadside verges. The alien plants are being studied to determine their persistance and the effect they may have on the adjacent native populations. Variation within and between two groups of alien plants growing near Hull has been measured. Discriminant analysis of 11 characters showing continuous variation gives a quantitative separation between the two groups of aliens, separates alien from native plants and can be used to detect hybrids between the two forms.

Le lotier spontané du nord de l'Europe est une plante généralement prostrée à petites feuilles et entre-noeuds courts. Des plantes morphologiquement différentes (port érigé, caréne pale, feuilles larges et tiges plus on moins creuses) ont été introduites lors du semis des remblais de routes nouvellement construites. L'étude de ces plantes introduites a pour objectif de déterminer leur persistance et l'effet de leur présence sur la population de plantes autochtones. Les plantes introduites sont comparées d'une part avec les plantes autochtones et d'autre part entre elles lorsqu'elles proviennent de sites différents prés de Hull. Une analyse discriminante sur onze caractéres biométriques a permis de quantifier la distance entre les groupes de plantes introduites, de mettre en évidence la présence d'hybrides entre autochtones et introduites.

Similar content being viewed by others

Living together in a context of plant invasion: the example of the plant communities at the Iles Kerguelen

Article Open access 03 December 2025

Road corridors vegetation in the semi-arid region: functional trait diversity and dynamics

Article Open access 24 October 2024

Tracing the evolutionary and genetic footprints of atmospheric tillandsioids transition from land to air

Article Open access 06 November 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Abbott, R J. 1981. The keel petal colour polymorphism of Lotus corniculatus in Scotland. New Phytol, 88, 549–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, B R, and Bailey, L G. 1983a. Morphometric relationships in Hordeum vulgare (Triticeae, Poaceae). I H. spontaneum. Can J Bot, 61, 2015–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, B R, and Bailey, L G. 1983b. Morphometric relationships in Hordeum vulgare (Triticeae, Poaceae). II. Hordeum agriocrithon, H distichum, H. lagunculiforme, H. spon-taneum and H vulgare. Can J Bot, 61, 2023–2031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaim, H, and Nowacki, E. 1979. Cyanogenesis in Lotus and Trifolium species. Acta agrobotanica, 32, 19–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chrtková-Z̆ertová, A. 1973. A monographic study of Lotus corniculatus L. I. Central and Northern Europe. Rozpravy Ceskoslovenské Akademie Vĕd, 83, 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J, and Hiesey, W M. 1958. Experimental studies on the nature of species IV. Genetic structure of ecological races. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 615, 1–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, S G, Newsome, D, and Jones, D A. 1983. Selection for cyanogenesis in the leaves and petals of Lotus corniculatus L. at high latitudes. Oecologia, 60, 353–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C D, and La Cour, L A. 1969. The handling of chromosomes, (5th ed.). George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearnley, S E. 1983. Morphological variation in European Lotus corniculatus. Unpublished BSc Project Report, University of Hull.

  • Dyer, A F. 1979. Investigating chromosomes, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, W. 1743. The modern husbandman: or, the practice of farming, (pp. 70–72, May issue). George Faulkner, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evered, D, and Collins, G N. 1984. Origins and development of adaptation. Pitman (for the C.I.B.A. Foundation), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, J P, Cheng, K J, Hanna, M R, Howarth, R E, and Costerton, J W. 1980. In vitro digestion of bloat-safe and bloat-causing legumes by rumen microorganisms: Gas and foam production. J Dairy Sci, 63, 1273–1281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, F, and Anger, V. 1966. Replacement of benzidine by copper ethylacetoacetate and tetrabase as spot-test reagent for hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen. Analyst, 91, 282–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W F, and Marten, G C. 1984. Birds-foot trefoil. In Heath, M. E., Metcalfe, D. S. and Bornes, R. S. (eds.), Forages: the science of grassland agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigal, D F, and Goldstein, R A. 1971. An integrated ordination classification analysis of an intensively sampled oak-hickory forest. Journal of Ecology, 59, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P E. 1978. Analyzing multivariate data. The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M J R. 1965. Descriptive uses of discriminant functions. In Mathematics and Computer Science in Biology and Medicine (ed. for the Medical Research Council). H.M.S.O., London, pp. 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoveland, C S, Haaland, R L, Harris, R R, and McGuire, J A. 1982. Birdsfoot trefoil in Alabama. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 537, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D A. 1973a. Co-evolution and cyanogenesis. In Heywood, V. H. (ed.), Taxonomy and Ecology. Academic Press, London, pp. 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D A. 1973b. On the polymorphism of cyanogenesis in Lotus corniculatus L. V. Denmark. Heredity, 30, 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D A. 1977. On the polymorphism of cyanogenesis in Lotus corniculatus L. VII. The distribution of the cyanogenic form in Western Europe. Heredity, 39, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D A, and Crawford, T J. 1977. Variation in the colour of the keel petals in Lotus corniculatus L. I. The polymorphism in Western Europe. Heredity, 39, 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, G L, Howarth, R E, Goplen, B P, and Fesser, A C. 1981. Mechanical disruption of leaf tissues and cells in some bloat-causing and bloat-safe forage legumes. Crop Sci, 21, 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K V, Kent, J T, and Bibby, J M. 1979. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J A. 1979. A study of the variability of some suc-cessional and climax plant assemblage-types using multiple discriminant analysis. J Ecol, 67, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, H A. 1946. Birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) Its characteristics and potentialities as a forage legume. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir, 261, 1–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N H, Hull, C H, Jenkins, J G, Steinbrenner, K, and Bent, D H. 1975. Statistical package for the social sciences, (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 434–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J M, and Barkham, J P. 1970. A comparison of some Cotswold beechwoods using multiple-discriminant analysis. J Ecol, 58, 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P A. 1983. The evolutionary biology of colonising species. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poostchi, I, and Macdonald, H A. 1961. Inheritance of leaf colour in broadleaf birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci, 1, 327–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D H. 1934. Birdsfoot trefoil in agriculture. Emp J Exp Agric, 2, 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeder, J M. 1978. Méthodes et programmes d'analyse discriminante, Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E J. 1961. Weeds and aliens. Collins New Naturalist, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaney, R R, and Henson, P R. 1970. Birdsfoot trefoil. Adv Agron, 22, 119–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, P M. 1951. A quantitative study of two populations of the moth Panaxia dominula (L.). Heredity, 5, 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, P M, and Cook, L M. 1962. The manifold effects of the medionigra gene in the moth Panaxia dominula and the maintenance of a polymorphism. Heredity, 17, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, E, Grant, W F, and Crompton, C W. 1984. A taxonomic study of the Lotus corniculatus complex in Turkey. Canad J Bot, 62, 1044–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantisewie, B, Ruijgrok, H W L, and Hegnauer, R. 1969. Die verbreitung der blausäure bei den cormophyten 5. Mitteilung: über cyanogene verbindungen bei den parietales und bei einigen weiteren sippen. Pharm Week-blad, 104, 1341–1355.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B K. 1983. Some observations on the use of discriminant analysis in ecology. Ecology, 64, 1283–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandstra, I I, and Grant, W F. 1968. The biosystematics of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae) in Canada. I. Cytotaxonomy. Can J Bot, 46, 557–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Françoise Bonnemaison: Laboratoire génétique évolutive, B.P. 2, CNRS, Rte. de Mende BP5051, 34033 Montpellier, Cédex, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Biology and Genetics, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, England

    Françoise Bonnemaison & David A Jones

Authors
  1. Françoise Bonnemaison
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David A Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonnemaison, F., Jones, D. Variation in alien Lotus corniculatus L. 1. Morphological differences between alien and native British plants. Heredity 56, 129–138 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.18

Download citation

  • Received: 11 December 1984

  • Issue date: 01 February 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.18

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited