Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the Giant Toad, Bufo marinus. IV. Gene flow estimated from admixture in Australian populations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 April 1986

The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the Giant Toad, Bufo marinus. IV. Gene flow estimated from admixture in Australian populations

  • Simon Easteal1 nAff2 

Heredity volume 56, pages 145–156 (1986)Cite this article

  • 790 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Allele frequency variation is described at nine polymorphic enzyme loci in 21 samples from populations of the introduced Giant Toad, Bufo marinus, in the region of Townsville in north Queensland, Australia. Some of these populations appear to have been established through the introgression of other populations that previously had been isolated. Comparisons of allele frequencies at three polymorphic loci between the introgressed populations and the original populations are used to obtain admixture estimates. These are used to estimate a rate of gene flow among the populations of approximately 2 km/year. This is consistent with an estimate based on the rate at which Bufo marinus has colonised new areas in Australia when discontinuities in the pattern of this colonisation are taken into account.The estimate of gene flow is combined with published data on population density to estimate neighbourhood size. The estimate obtained is substantially greater than the effective population size estimate determined previously from data on allele frequency variances in other populations. This discrepancy is most likely due to inaccuracies in the population density estimates, to underestimates of the extent of offspring number variance and perhaps to occasional departures from sex ratio parity. It has important implications for the study of the genetic structure of populations which are discussed.

Similar content being viewed by others

Population genomics informs the management of harvested snappers across north-western Australia

Article Open access 04 November 2024

Population genomics and conservation management of a declining tropical rodent

Article Open access 04 March 2021

Genetic structure of American bullfrog populations in Brazil

Article Open access 15 June 2022

Article PDF

References

  • Baker, A E M. 1981. Gene flow in house mice: introduction of a new allele into free living populations. Evolution, 35, 243–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L L, and Bodmer, W F. 1971. The Genetics of Human Populations Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, Boussy, I A, Prout, T, Bryant, S H, Jones, J S, and Moore, J A. 1982. Long-distance migration of Drosophila. Amer Natur, 119, 589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M H, Gonzalez, N L, Schanfield, M S, Dykes, D D, Skradski, K, and Polesky, H F. 1981. The black Caribs (Garifuna) of Livingston, Guatemala: Genetic markers and admixture estimates. Hum Biol, 53, 87–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J C. 1981. Effects of social organization and environmental diversity on determining the genetic structure of a population of the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Evolution, 35, 689–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eanes, W F, and Koehn, R K. 1978. An analysis of genetic structure in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus. Evolution, 32, 784–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, S. 1981. The history of introductions of Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Anura); a natural experiment in evolution. Biol J Linn Soc, 16, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, S. 1982. The genetics of introduced populations of the giant toad, Bufo marinus; a natural experiment in evolution. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University.

  • Easteal, S. 1985a. The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the giant toad, Bufo marinus. II. Effective population size. Genetics, 110, 107–122.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, S. 1985b. The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the giant toad Bufo marinus. III. Geographical patterns of variation. Evolution, 39, 1065–1075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easteal, S, and Floyd, R B. 1985. The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the giant toad, Bufo marinus. Dispersal and neighbourhood size. Biol J Linn Soc (in press).

  • Easteal, S, Van Beurden, E K, Floyd, R B, and Sabath, M D. 1985. Continuing spread of Bufo marinus in Australia: Range expansion between 1974 and 1980. J Herpetol, 19, 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P R, and Raven, P H. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science, 165, 1228–1232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J A. 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, R B, Boughton, W C, Easteal, S, Sabath, M D, and Van Beurden, E K. 1981. Distribution records of the marine toad (Bufo marinus). Part 1, Australia (2nd edition). AES Working Paper 3/81. School of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University.

  • Franco, M H L P, Weimer, T A, and Salzano, F M. 1981. Blood polymorphisms and racial admixture in two Brazilian populations. Amer J Phys Anthrop 58, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D E. 1978. Effective population size and interdemic migration rates in a metapopulation of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalamus vividescens (Rafinesque). Evolution, 32, 839–849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S N. 1983. Contrasting gene flow patterns and genetic subdivision in adjacent populations of Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution, 37, 760–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J S, Bryant, S H, Lewontin, R C, Moore, J A, and Prout, T. 1981. Gene flow and geographical distribu-tion of a molecular polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 98, 157–178.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A, Wake, D B, and Yanev, K P. 1984. Measuring gene flow among populations having high levels of genetic fragmentation. Genetics, 106, 293–308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D E. 1983. Gene flow distances in natural populations of Tetraopes tetraophthalamus. Evolution, 37, 1239–1246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mungomery, R W. 1937. The present situation regarding the giant American toad in Queensland. Cane Grower's QuartBull, 5, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583–590.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J L, and Feder, J H. 1981. Microspatial genetic heterogeneity in pocket gophers: Non random breeding and drift. Evolution, 35, 912–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabath, M D, Boughton, W C, and Easteal, S. 1981. Expansion of the range of the introduced toad Bufo marinus in Australia from 1935 to 1974. Copeia, 1981, 676–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B A. 1980. Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature, 284, 450–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, G E, and Hay, D A. 1983. The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Mus musculus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 11, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. 1981. Estimating levels of gene flow in natural populations. Genetics, 99, 323–321.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P H A, and Sokal, R R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S M. 1979. Microevolution: Pattern and Process Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R H, and Neel, J V. 1976. The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama indians. XIV. Clines and their interpretation. Genetics, 82, 103–121.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P L. 1973. Genetic analysis of hybrid populations. In Methods and Theories of Anthropological Genetics, ed. M. H. Crawford and P. L. Workman, pp 117–150. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P L, and Niswander, J D. 1969. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Amer J Hum Gent, 22, 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zera, A J. 1981. Genetic structure of two species of waterstriders (Gerridae: Hemiptera) with differing degrees of winglessness. Evolution, 35, 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Simon Easteal

    Present address: Department of Zoology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, 73019, U.S.A.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Biology, Research School of Biological Sciences, The Australian National University Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

    Simon Easteal

Authors
  1. Simon Easteal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Easteal, S. The ecological genetics of introduced populations of the Giant Toad, Bufo marinus. IV. Gene flow estimated from admixture in Australian populations. Heredity 56, 145–156 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.25

Download citation

  • Received: 24 May 1985

  • Issue date: 01 April 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1986.25

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Genetic structure of populations of the domestic cat in Catalonia (Spain) and upper midwestern USA: A microgeographic and macrogeographic study

    • Manuel Ruiz-Garcia
    • Keith K. Klein

    Journal of Genetics (1997)

  • Polyclony and low relative heterozygosity in a widespread unisexual vertebrate, Lepidodactylus lugubris (Sauria)

    • G. Pasteur
    • J.-F. Agn�se
    • N. Pasteur

    Genetica (1987)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited