Abstract
Morphological correlates of male mating success were assessed in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Mating males in D. simulans were larger than single males but were characterized by reduced developmental stability as indicated by fluctuating asymmetry. Mating male D. pseudoobscura were no larger than single males but exhibited significantly greater developmental stability. In D. mojavensis, however, mating males were larger and they showed a similar level of fluctuating asymmetry to that observed in single males. The differences observed between species are discussed in the context of their mating systems and reproductive ecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Boake, C. 1989. Correlation between courtship success, aggressive success, and body size in a picture singed fly, Drosophila silvestris. Ethology, 80, 318–329.
Gromko, M H, and Markow, T A. 1991. Courtship and remating in field populations of Drosophila. Anim Behav, (in press).
James, A, and Jaenike, J. 1991. Determinants of male mating success in Drosophila tectacea. Anim Behav, (in press).
Lerner, I M. 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. John Wiley, New York.
Lerner, I M. 1958. The Genetic Basis of Selection. John Wiley, New York.
Long, C, Markow, T, and Yaeger, P. 1980. Relative male age, fertility, and competetive mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet, 10, 163–170.
Markow, T. 1982. Mating systems of Cactiphilic Drosophila. In: Barker, J. S. F. and Starmer, W T., (eds) Ecological Genetics and Evolution: the Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System. Academic Press, New York.
Markow, T A. 1985. A comparative investigation of the mating system of Drosophila hydei. Anim Behav, 33, 775–781.
Markow, T. 1987a. Nocturnal emissions in Drosophila simulons. Drosophila Information Service. 66, 95.
Markow, T A. 1987b. Genetics of sexual selection in Drosophila. In: Huettle, M. (ed.) Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior. Plenum. New York.
Markow, T. 1988. Reproductive behavior of Drosophila in the laboratory and in the field. J Comp Psychol, 102, 169–174.
Markow, T, and Ankney, P. 1984. Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple mating species. Science, 224, 302–303.
Markow, T A, and Ricker, J. 1991. Developmental stability in hybrids between the sibling species pair Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genetica, 84, 115–121.
Markow, T, and Sawka, S. 1991. Dynamics of sexual selection in experimental groups of Drosophila melanogaster. (in press).
Markow, T, and Toolson, E. 1990. Temperature shift, epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. In: Starmer, W. T. and Barker, J. S. F., (eds) Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
Palmer, A R, and Strobeck, C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann, Rev Ecol Syst, 17, 291–321.
Parsons, P A. 1962. Maternal age and developmental variability. J Exp Biol, 39, 251–260.
Partridge, L, Ewing, E, and Chandler, A. 1987a. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. The role of female and male behaviour. Anim, Behav, 35, 555–562.
Partridge, L, Hoffmann, A, and Jones, S. 1987b. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim Behav, 35, 468–476.
Reeve, E C R. 1960. Some genetic tests on asymmetry of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila. Genet Res, 1, 151–172.
Ruiz, A, Santos, M, Barbadilla, A, Quezada-Diaz, J E, Hasson, E, and Fontedevila, A. 1991. Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics, 128, 739–750.
Santos, M, Ruiz, A, Barbadilla, A, Quezada-Diaz, J E, Hasson, E, and Fontedevila, A. 1988. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity, 61, 255–262.
Van Valen, L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16, 125–141.
Wilkinson, G S. 1987. Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 41, 11–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markow, T., Ricker, J. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Heredity 69, 122–127 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.104
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.104
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Body size and age of drone honeybees (Apis mellifera) affect the structure and characteristics of mating congregations via dispersal
Apidologie (2023)
-
Pupal size as a proxy for fat content in laboratory-reared and field-collected Drosophila species
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Asymmetry in the ovarioles, mandibular glands and hypopharyngeal glands of honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers developing in queenright or queenless colonies
Apidologie (2022)
-
Small females prefer small males: size assortative mating in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
Parasites & Vectors (2018)
-
Fluctuating asymmetry of meristic traits: an isofemale line analysis in an invasive drosophilid, Zaprionus indianus
Genetica (2017)
