Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
A quantitative genetic analysis of reproductive allocation in the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus fasciatus
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 1992

A quantitative genetic analysis of reproductive allocation in the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus fasciatus

  • F K Kasule1 

Heredity volume 69, pages 141–149 (1992)Cite this article

  • 698 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Observations were made of genetic variability of reproductive allocation in a population of the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus fasciatus. In addition, genetic correlations between reproductive allocation and maternal size and between performances of reproductive allocation in two moisture environments were investigated. Groups of siblings were grown in either a low or a high moisture environment. Heritability estimates were approximately 1.0 in the low environment and 0.7 in the high environment. There was a tight and positive genetic association between reproductive allocation and maternal size in both environments. Some 50 per cent of the phenotypic variance in reproductive allocation across environments was due to genotype-by-environment interactions. The correlation between performances in low and high environments was less than unity, and environmental sensitivity and mean performance were negatively associated. These results indicate that the population sampled would respond to directional selection, with mean peformance and phenotypic plasticity of reproductive allocation moving in opposite directions.

Similar content being viewed by others

The role of maternal effects on offspring performance in familiar and novel environments

Article 06 April 2021

Genetic architecture of dispersal behaviour in the post-harvest pest and model organism Tribolium castaneum

Article Open access 29 July 2023

Seasonal changes in recombination characteristics in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster

Article 23 June 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Bauwens, D, and Theon, C. 1981. Escape tactics and vulnerability to predation associated with reproduction in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. J Anim Ecol, 50, 733–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet, 13, 115–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capinera, J L. 1979. Qualitative variation in plants and insects: Effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am Nat, 114, 350–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1984. The evolutionary genetics of life histories. In: Shorrocks, B. (ed.) Evolutionary Ecology, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1987. The heritability of fitness. In: Bradburry, J. W. and Anderson, M. B. (eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, M L. 1981. Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for tree frogs. Am Nat, 117, 724–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat, 86, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1990. Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res, 56, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerking, S D. 1959. Physiological changes accompanying aging in fishes. In: Wolsteinholme, E. and O'Connor, M. (eds), Ciba Foundation Coloquia on Aging, I, Churchill Livingstone, London, pp. 181–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesal, J T, Murphy, P A, and Manlove, M N. 1982. The influence of temperature on genetic interrelationships of life history traits in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat, 119, 464–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A, and Begon, M. 1982. The status of general reproductive-strategy theories, illustrated in winkles. Oecologia, 52, 37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshfield, M F, and Tinkle, D W. 1975. Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA, 72, 2227–2231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R H, and Cooper, W S. 1984. The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: An application of the ‘adaptive coin-flipping’ principle. Am Nat, 123, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasule, F K. 1991. Quantitative variation in adult size and fecundity of the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus fasciatus. Heredity, 66, 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, P D, and Hill, W G. 1988. Quantitative genetic variability by mutation-stabilizing selection in finite populations. Genet Res, 52, 33–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1975. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet Res, 26, 221–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology, 63, 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, M, and Brown, U K. 1985. A general relationship between adult weight and the reproductive potential of aphids. J Anim Ecol, 54, 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, W E, De Paiva, L J, Da Rocha, R M, Franke, G R, Kasper, L A, and Lima, A P. 1985. The correlates of foraging mode in a community of Brazilian lizards. Herpertologia, 41, 324–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M M, and Van't Hoff, H M. 1988. The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on low-water diet: increased metabolic processing costs or nutrient limitation? J Insect Physiol, 34, 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P A, Giesel, J T, and Manlove, N N. 1983. Temperature effects on life history variation in Drosophila simulons. Evolution, 42, 774–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E O. 1958. The Insects Pest of Cotton in Tropical Africa, Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R H. 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M J. 1985. The allometry of reproduction: why larger species invest relatively less in their offspring. J Theor Biol 113, 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1959. Experimental design in the evaluation of genetic parameters. Biometrics, 15, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R M. 1982. Antagonistic pleiotrophy, dominance and genetic variation. Heredity, 48, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S M, and Goodnight, C J. 1984. The comparison of phenotypic plasticity and genetic variation in populations of the grass Danthonia spicata. Evolution, 38, 845–855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sclichting, C D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 17, 667–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I T. 1949. Factors of Evolution, Blackston, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel, R A, and Fitch, H S. 1984. Ecological patterns of relative clutch mass in snakes. Oecologia, 61, 293–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine, R. 1980. Costs of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia, 46, 92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine, R. 1988. Constraints on reproductive investment: a comparison between aquatic and terrestrial snakes. Evolution, 42, 17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza Santos, P, Jr, and Begon, M. 1987. Survival costs of reproduction in grasshoppers. Funct Ecol, 1, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R J. 1982. The relationship between food ratio and reproductive effort in the green sea urchin. Oecologia, 56, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, S G. 1968. Size-fecundity relationships in five desmograthine salamanders. Evolution, 22, 806–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tinkle, D W. 1969. The concept of reproductive effort and its relation to the evolution of life histories in lizards. Am Nat, 103, 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinkle, D W, and Hadley, N F. 1975. Lizard reproductive effort: caloric estimates and comments on its evolution. Ecology, 56, 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance. Larch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol, 25, 138–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1984. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution, 38, 896–913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S, and Lande, R. 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 39, 505–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S, and Lande, R. 1987. Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype × environment interaction. Genet Res, 49, 147–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, L J. 1981. Lizard reproduction: habitat specificity and constrains on relative clutch mass. Am Nat, 117, 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, L J, and Congdon, J D. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort and relative clutch mass in lizards: Resolution of a paradox. Am Nat, 112, 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, D G S. 1933. The bionomics and control of Dysdercus (Hemiptera) in the Sudan. Bull Entomol Res, 24, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willows, R I. 1987. Population dynamics and life history of two contrasting populations of Ligia oceanica (Crustacea: Oniscidea) in the rocky supralittoral. J Anim Ecol, 56, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank J. Goha for technical assistance and referees for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35064, Tanzania

    F K Kasule

Authors
  1. F K Kasule
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasule, F. A quantitative genetic analysis of reproductive allocation in the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus fasciatus. Heredity 69, 141–149 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.107

Download citation

  • Received: 04 October 1991

  • Issue date: 01 August 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.107

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Dysdercus fasciatus
  • genetic variability
  • reproductive allocation

This article is cited by

  • A quantitative genetic model for mixed diploid and triploid hybrid progenies in tree breeding and evolution

    • R. Wu

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1995)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited