Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida (seaweed fly)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 September 1992

Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida (seaweed fly)

  • A S Gilburn1,
  • S P Foster1 &
  • T H Day1 

Heredity volume 69, pages 209–216 (1992)Cite this article

  • 1175 Accesses

  • 43 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Female mating preferences were studied in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. The female acceptance/rejection response to the intial mount by randomly chosen males was scored and male mating success determined by the subsequent production of progeny. The sizes of males and females, as well as their genotypes at the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) locus, were determined. Both adult size and the Adh locus are known to be strongly associated with a large chromosomal inversion system. Stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed no association between male mating success and male Adh genotype, but a stong association was found with male size. Female mating preferences appear to exert strong directional selection in favour of large males. There was also an association between female acceptance rate and female Adh genotype, which is likely to be a consequence of inversion karyotype rather than the Adh locus. It is suggested that the discrepancy between the mean size of males in natural populations and the preferred male size indicates that the forces of natural (viability) selection and sexual selection act in opposition.

Similar content being viewed by others

Size, not color, drives assortative mating and influences fledging survival, weight and immunity in a polymorphic owl

Article Open access 02 June 2025

Rapid evolution of sexual size dimorphism facilitated by Y-linked genetic variance

Article 19 August 2021

Transitions in sex determination mechanisms through parental and sexual antagonism

Article 21 August 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Andersson, M B. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc, 17, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, J B. 1975. Investigations into chromosomes 1, 2 and 3 of Coelopa frigida. PhD Thesis. University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A, and Read, A E. 1991. Testing alternative models of sexual selection through female choice. Trends Ecol Evol, 6, 274–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, G. 1981. Mate selection in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria: female choice in a male-controlled system. Anim Behav, 29, 11–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breden, F, and Stoner, G. 1987. Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature, 329, 831–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, D, and De La Motte, I. 1988. Big ‘antlers’ are favoured: female choice in stalk-eyed flies. Field collected harems and laboratory experiments. J Comp Physiol A., 162, 649–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, Collins, P M, and Day, T H. 1984. The effect of larval density on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 52, 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, Collins, P M, Skevington, S J, and Day, T H. 1982a. Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 48, 45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, and Day, T H. 1984. The effect of larval competition on development time and adult size in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Oecologia, 63, 122–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, and Day, T H. 1985. Adult size, longevity and fecundity in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 54, 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, and Day, T H. 1989. Environmental correlates of inversion frequencies in natural populations of seaweed flies (Coelopa). Heredity, 62, 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R K, Read, I L, and Day, T H. 1982b. The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 49, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cade, W. 1975. Acoustically orienting parasitoids: fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science, 190, 1312–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P M. 1978. Studies on genetic polymorphism in Coelopa frigida. PhD. Thesis University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, P, and Wahba, G. 1979. Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalised cross-validation. Numer Math, 31, 377–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, G, and Day, T H. 1987. An advantage to mate choice in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 20, 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, T H, Dawe, C, Dobson, T, and Hillier, P C. 1983. A chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Scandinavian populations of the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Hereditas, 99, 135–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, T H, Dobson, T, Hillier, P C, Parkin, D T, and Clarke, B. 1982. Associations of enzymic and chromosomal polymorphisms in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 48, 35–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, T H, Foster, S P, and Engelhard, G. 1990. Mating behaviour in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). J Insect Behav, 3, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, T H, Miles, S, Pilkington, M D, and Butlin, R K. 1987. Differential mating success in populations of seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). Heredity, 58, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhard, G, Foster, S P, and Day, T H. 1989. Genetic differences in mating success and female choice in seaweed flies (Coelopa frigida). Heredity, 62, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S P. 1989. Selection concerning reproduction in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, D T. 1982. Mate selection by female katydids (Orthoptera: tettigoniidae) Conocephalus nigropleurum. Anim Behav, 30, 734–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W D, and Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitnesses and bright birds: a role for parasites. Science, 218, 384–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L K. 1982. Sexual selection in a brentid weevil. Evolution, 36, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1986. Sexual selection and cycling parasites: a simulation study of Hamilton's hypothesis. J Theor Biol, 119, 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M, and Ryan, M J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350, 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution, 33, 402–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA, 78, 3721–3725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R, and Arnold, S J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1956. Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet, 54, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1991. Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol, 6, 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, D E, and Wade, M J. 1978. Female choice and the mating structure of a natural population of the soldier beetle Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Evolution, 32, 771–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald, P. 1980. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitafi, K D. 1991. Male mate choice in seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.

  • Pitafi, K D, Simpson, R, Stephen, J J, and Day, T H. 1990. Adult size and mate choice in seaweed flies. Heredity, 65, 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J D, and Gross, M R. 1990. Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox? Am Nat, 136, 230–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M J. 1985. The Túngara Frog. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution, 42, 849–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E B, and Langer, B. 1964. Mating speed and control by gene arrangements in Drosophila persimilis. Evolution, 18, 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol, 53, 205–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    A S Gilburn, S P Foster & T H Day

Authors
  1. A S Gilburn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S P Foster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T H Day
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilburn, A., Foster, S. & Day, T. Female mating preference for large size in Coelopa frigida (seaweed fly). Heredity 69, 209–216 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.118

Download citation

  • Received: 02 October 1991

  • Issue date: 01 September 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.118

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Coelopa frigida
  • female mate choice
  • sexual selection

This article is cited by

  • Inversion frequencies and phenotypic effects are modulated by the environment: insights from a reciprocal transplant study in Coelopa frigida

    • Emma Berdan
    • Hanna Rosenquist
    • Maren Wellenreuther

    Evolutionary Ecology (2018)

  • The effect of an inversion system and the time interval between matings on postcopulatory sexual selection in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida

    • J E Blyth
    • A S Gilburn

    Heredity (2005)

  • The benefits of multiple mating to female seaweed flies, Coelopa frigida (Diptera: Coelpidae)

    • D. W. Dunn
    • J. P. Sumner
    • D. Goulson

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2005)

  • Female mating behaviour, sexual selection and chromosome I inversion karyotype in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida

    • André S Gilburn
    • Thomas H Day

    Heredity (1999)

  • The evolution of female choice when the preference and the preferred trait are linked to the same inversion system

    • André S Gilburn
    • Thomas H Day

    Heredity (1996)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited