Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
A hierarchical analysis of genetic structure and variability in patchily distributed coexisting Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 May 1996

A hierarchical analysis of genetic structure and variability in patchily distributed coexisting Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)

  • Jes Johannesen1 nAff2 &
  • Volker Loeschcke1 

Heredity volume 76, pages 437–448 (1996)Cite this article

  • 1081 Accesses

  • 13 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The pattern of genetic variation in four coexisting fly species of the genus Chiastocheta was studied by allozyme electrophoresis. The fly species are confined to patches of one plant, Trollius europaeus, and thus experience very similar habitat fluctuations. Collection sites were chosen in a hierarchical fashion and F-statistics were estimated at three levels: intraregion, inter-region and total population. Population characteristic genetic parameters were compared within and among species and were related to the hierarchical level. The species were used as replicate experiments for inference of habitat history, and the hierarchical levels were used as inference for specific gene flow patterns. Genetic variability was related to relative species abundance but not to local population size. The species divided into two heterogeneity classes, C. dentifera/C. trollii, and C. inermella/C. abruptiventris, where the former pair had more genetic variation than the latter. However, among all species no differences in the average number of alleles per locus were found. The amount of variability was not related to interspecific phylogeny, and the species could thus be analysed independently for genetic structure. Species-specific genetic patterns were found, but for all species the amount of genetic differentiation was related to regional geography. For three species, differentiation within regions was often higher than at the total population level whereas the differentiation among regions was negligible. Differentiation of the fourth species, C. inermella, increased with geographical scale indicating an isolation-by-distance genetic structure. We suggest that within species the amount of genetic differentiation need not be related to intraspecific ancestry, as high differentiation was not necessarily associated with low expected geographical structure.

Similar content being viewed by others

Variation in heat shock protein 40 kDa relates to divergence in thermotolerance among cryptic rotifer species

Article Open access 31 December 2022

Genetic diversity and structure lag the effects of contemporary environmental changes in a platypus meta-population

Article 06 June 2025

Macroevolution along developmental lines of least resistance in fly wings

Article Open access 07 February 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Archie, J W. 1985. Statistical analysis of heterozygosity data: independent sample comparisons. Evolution, 39, 623–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F J, Powell, J F, Tracy, M L, Maoraoc, A, and Peréz-Salas, S. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics, 70, 113–139.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Black, W C, IV, and Krafsur, E S. 1985. Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variability in the house fly (Musca domestica L.). Biochem Genet, 23, 193–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, E H, Van Dijk, H, and Van Delden, W. 1981. Genetic variability of the face fly, Musca automalis De Geer, in relation to a population bottleneck. Evolution, 35, 872–881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R, Fuerst, P A, and Nei, M. 1980. Stastistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. III. Distribution of allele frequencies and the number of alleles per locus. Genetics, 94, 1039–1063.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, J E. 1954. The genus Chiastocheata Pokorny (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Proc R Ent Soc Lond B, 23, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descimon, H, and Napolitano, M. 1993. Enzyme polymorphism, wing pattern variability, and geographical isolation in an endangered butterfly species. Biol Conserv, 66, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. 1991. The genetic effective size of a meta-population. Biol J Linn Soc, 42, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol J Linn Soc, 42, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H, and Hopkinson, D A. 1978. Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. Supplement. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesen, J, and Loeschcke, V. Distribution, abundance and oviposition patterns of four coexisting Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). J Anim Ecol. (in press).

  • Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Kimura, M, and Crow, J F. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics, 49, 725–738.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krafsur, E S. 1993. Allozyme variation in stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Biochem Genet, 31, 231–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, E J, and Dempster, E R. 1987. An exact test for Hardy–Weinberg and multiple alleles. Biometrics, 43, 805–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res, 27, 209–220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, T, and Kimura, M. 1980. Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 77, 6710–6714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D E. 1989. Extinction, colonization, and population structure: a study of a milkweed beetle. Am Nat, 134, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D E. 1991. The effect of host plant patch size variation on the population structure of a specialist herbivore insect, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus. Evolution, 45, 1675–1684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, V. 1985. A revision of the Anthomyiidae (Diptera) described by J. W. Zetterstedt. Steenstrupia, 11, 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, M, and Descimon, H. 1994. Genetic structure of French populations of the mountain butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne, L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Biol J Linn Soc, 53, 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat, 106, 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M, Maruyama, T, and Chakraborty, R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O. 1989. The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia, 78, 53–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O. 1992. The phylogeny of a mutualism: evolution and coadaptation between Trollius and its seed-parasitic pollinators. Biol J Linn Soc, 47, 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J R. 1975. Protein variation in natural populations of animals. Evol Biol, 8, 79–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, R H. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat, 132, 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J, Weir, B S, and Cockerham, C C. 1983. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics, 105, 767–779.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richarson, B J, Baverstock, P R, and Adams, M. 1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies. Academic Press Inc., San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R K, Smith, M H, Yang, S Y, Johnson, W E, and Gentrey, J B. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics IV. Univ. Texas Publ. no. 7103, 49–90.

  • Singh, R S, and Rhomberg, L R. 1987. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Estimates of gene flow from rare alleles. Genetics, 115, 313–322.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. 1977. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Pop Biol, 12, 253–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 16, 393–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution, 47, 264–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D L, and Selander, R B. 1989. BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered, 72, 281–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiuk, J, and Loeschcke, V. 1995. Genetic identity tion genetic consequences of colony formation and combining mutation and drift. Heredity, 74, 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M J, and McCapley, D E. 1988. Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution, 42, 995–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B S, and Cockerham, C C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, M C, and McCauley, D E. 1990. Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution, 44, 1717–1724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 4, Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Jes Johannesen

    Present address: Institute of Zoology, Department of Population Biology, University of Mainz, Saarstrasse 21, D-55099, Mainz, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics and Ecology, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Building 540, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark

    Jes Johannesen & Volker Loeschcke

Authors
  1. Jes Johannesen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Volker Loeschcke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johannesen, J., Loeschcke, V. A hierarchical analysis of genetic structure and variability in patchily distributed coexisting Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Heredity 76, 437–448 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.66

Download citation

  • Received: 24 May 1995

  • Issue date: 01 May 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.66

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Chiastocheta
  • coexistence
  • F-statistics
  • gene flow patterns
  • genetic variability
  • population structure

This article is cited by

  • Neutral and quantitative genetic differentiation among Trollius europaeus populations within a fragmented landscape

    • Andrea R. Pluess
    • Charlotte Klank
    • Jaboury Ghazoul

    Alpine Botany (2013)

  • Genetic variation and plant performance in fragmented populations of globeflowers (Trollius europaeus) within agricultural landscapes

    • Charlotte Klank
    • Jaboury Ghazoul
    • Andrea R. Pluess

    Conservation Genetics (2012)

  • Hierarchical analysis of genetic structure in Spanish donkey breeds using microsatellite markers

    • J Aranguren-Méndez
    • M Gómez
    • J Jordana

    Heredity (2002)

  • Hierarchical genetic structure and effective population sizes in Phalacrus substriatus

    • Pär K Ingvarsson
    • Katarina Olsson

    Heredity (1997)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited