Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Estimating selective coefficients of allelic substitutions from patterns of interspecific allozymic mobility difference
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 June 1997

Estimating selective coefficients of allelic substitutions from patterns of interspecific allozymic mobility difference

  • D J Colgan1 

Heredity volume 78, pages 655–664 (1997) Cite this article

  • 630 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The neutral hypothesis of molecular evolution predicts that there should be a 1:1 ratio between allozymes in a species which are faster or slower than allozymes at the corresponding loci in a second species. Methods are presented in this paper for estimating selective differentials from observed values of r, the deviation from a fraction of 1/2 in the proportion of substitutions conferring a mobility change in a specified direction. Although the methods were developed for allozymes, they are readily applied to cases where two taxa may differ in other properties, such as DNA sequence. r is related to the selection coefficient s under a ‘genic selection’ model. If a change in one direction is favoured in one species and a change in the other direction is equally favoured in the second species, both s and N are assumed constant and only one substitution has occurred at each locus, then the estimate of s is approximately (ln(1/2+r) − ln(1/2 − r))/4N. If selective coefficients follow an unspecified distribution f(s) and N is assumed constant, then the average value of s lies between r/2N(1/2 + r) and r/2N(1/2 − r). Specifying the distribution of s to enable point estimation of E(s) is mathematically difficult for the usual probability density functions. A new family of distributions is suggested to overcome these difficulties. The analysis is extended to cover estimation of r where more than one substitution has occurred. The range of the various estimates of s provided by these methods from electrophoretic data is usually below 1/N and mostly substantially so.

Similar content being viewed by others

Evaluation of a custom QIAseq targeted DNA panel with 164 ancestry informative markers sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq

Article Open access 26 October 2021

A probabilistic graphical model for estimating selection coefficients of nonsynonymous variants from human population sequence data

Article Open access 20 May 2025

Mutations to transcription factor MAX allosterically increase DNA selectivity by altering folding and binding pathways

Article Open access 14 January 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Colgan, D J. 1992. Interspecific isoenzymic substitution is not random. Heredity, 69, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J F, and Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, J S. 1991. Theoretical Population Genetics. Unwin-Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J H. 1991. The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J H. 1994. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. II. Exchangeable models from population genetics. Evolution, 48, 1101–1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1962. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics, 47, 713–719.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1986. DNA and the neutral theory. Phil Trans R Soc B, 312, 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1990. Some models of neutral evolution, compensatory evolution and the shifting balance process. Theor Pop Biol, 37, 150–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W-H, Wu, C-I, and Luo, C-C. 1985. A new method for estimating synonymous and non-synonymous rates of substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol, 2, 150–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malécot, G. 1952. Les processus stochastiques et la méthode des fonctions génératrices ou caractéristiques. Extr Publ l'ISUP, 3, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukai, T, Chigusa, S, and Yoshikawa, I. 1965. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Dominance effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability in heterogeneous genetic backgrounds. Genetics, 52, 493–501.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature, 246, 96–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T. 1977. Extension to the neutral mutation drift hypothesis. In: Kimura, M (ed.) Molecular Evolution and Polymorphism, pp. 148–167. National Institute of Genetics, Mishima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, T. 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 23, 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, J M H. 1961. Advanced Calculus. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S A, and Hartl, D L. 1992. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics, 132, 1161–1176.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R L, and Skibinski, D O F. 1982. Inter-locus allozyme mobility correlations and species divergence. Experientia, 38, 654–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K H, and Sharp, P M. 1993. Mammalian gene evolution: nucleotide sequence divergence between mouse and rat. J Mol Evol, 37, 441–456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ken and Yasuko Myer Molecular Evolutionary Biology Unit, The Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, 2000, Australia

    D J Colgan

Authors
  1. D J Colgan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D J Colgan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colgan, D. Estimating selective coefficients of allelic substitutions from patterns of interspecific allozymic mobility difference. Heredity 78, 655–664 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.105

Download citation

  • Received: 23 September 1996

  • Issue date: 01 June 1997

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.105

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • electrophoresis
  • isozymes
  • neutral theory
  • selective coefficients
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited