Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Hypertension Research
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. hypertension research
  3. original article
  4. article
Renal and Vascular Protective Effects of Telmisartan in Patients with Essential Hypertension
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 2006

Renal and Vascular Protective Effects of Telmisartan in Patients with Essential Hypertension

  • Satoshi Morimoto1,2,
  • Yutaka Yano1,
  • Kei Maki1 &
  • …
  • Katsunori Sawada1 

Hypertension Research volume 29, pages 567–572 (2006)Cite this article

  • 2980 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

It is known that the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have organ protective effects in patients with heart failure or renal impairment. Several studies have revealed that the ARB telmisartan has an organ protective effect, but there have been few studies directly comparing the effects of telmisartan and calcium antagonists, since most clinical studies on telmisartan have been conducted in treated patients or patients on combination therapy. The present study was conducted to compare the renal and vascular protective effects of telmisartan monotherapy and calcium antagonist monotherapy in untreated hypertensive patients. Forty-three patients with untreated essential hypertension were randomized to receive amlodipine (n=22) or telmisartan (n=21), which were respectively administered at doses of 5 mg and 40 mg once daily in the morning for 24 weeks. The patients were examined before and after treatment to assess changes of renal function, flow-mediated dilation (a parameter of vascular endothelial function), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV; a parameter of arteriosclerosis). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in these parameters between groups. The decreases of urinary albumin excretion and baPWV, and the increase of flow-mediated dilation were significantly greater in the telmisartan group than the amlodipine group, while the antihypertensive effects were not significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, these results suggest that telmisartan is more effective at protecting renal function and vascular endothelial function, and at improving arteriosclerosis than the calcium channel blocker in patients with essential hypertension.

Similar content being viewed by others

Novel antihypertensive agents for resistant hypertension: what does the future hold?

Article 27 September 2022

The FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial

Article 20 September 2022

Phase III randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of amlodipine and candesartan cilexetil combination for hypertension treatment

Article Open access 03 October 2024

Article PDF

References

  1. Suzuki H, Kanno Y, Efficacy of Candesartan on Outcome in Saitama Trial (E-COST) Group: Effects of candesartan on cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res 2005; 28: 307–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan T : Renin, angiotensin, sodium and organ damage. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 349–354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. White WB, Lacourciere Y, Davidai G : Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure: impact on the early morning period. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 347–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al: Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Motobe K, Tomiyama H, Koji Y, et al: Cut-off value of the ankle-brachial pressure index at which the accuracy of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement is diminished. Circ J 2005; 69: 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lacourciere Y, Lenis J, Orchard R, et al: A comparison of the efficacies and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan and amlodipine. Blood Press Monit 1998; 3: 295–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al, RENAAL Study Investigators : Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iino Y, Hayashi M, Kawamura T, et al, Japanese Losartan Therapy Intended for the Global Renal Protection in Hypertensive Patients (JLIGHT) Study Investigators : Renoprotective effect of losartan in comparison to amlodipine in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension—a report of the Japanese Losartan Therapy Intended for the Global Renal Protection in Hypertensive Patients (JLIGHT) study. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 21–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanhoutte PM, Mombouli JV : Vascular endothelium: vasoactive mediators. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1996; 39: 229–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luscher TF, Barton M : Biology of the endothelium. Clin Cardiol 1997; 20 ( 11 Suppl 2): II-3–II-10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM : Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest 1983; 49: 327–333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheetham C, O'Driscoll G, Stanton K, et al: Losartan, an angiotensin type I receptor antagonist, improves conduit vessel endothelial function in type II diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001; 100: 13–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, et al: Effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril on reactive hyperemia in patients with essential hypertension: relationship between treatment periods and resistance artery endothelial function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 863–870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Munakata M, Aihara A, Nunokawa T, et al: The influence of one-year treatment by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on baroreflex sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in essential hypertension—comparison with calcium channel blockers. Clin Exp Hypertens 2003; 25: 169–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson TJ, Elstein E, Haber H, et al: Comparative study of ACE-inhibition, angiotensin II antagonism, and calcium channel blockade on flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with coronary disease (BANFF study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 60–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchida H, Nakamura Y, Kaihara M, et al: Practical efficacy of telmisartan for decreasing morning home blood pressure and pulse wave velocity in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 545–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Munakata M, Nagasaki A, Nunokawa T, et al: Effects of valsartan and nifedipine coat-core on systemic arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 1050–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Ohmihachiman City Hospital, Ohmihachiman, Japan

    Satoshi Morimoto, Yutaka Yano, Kei Maki & Katsunori Sawada

  2. Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan

    Satoshi Morimoto

Authors
  1. Satoshi Morimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yutaka Yano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kei Maki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katsunori Sawada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Morimoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morimoto, S., Yano, Y., Maki, K. et al. Renal and Vascular Protective Effects of Telmisartan in Patients with Essential Hypertension. Hypertens Res 29, 567–572 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.29.567

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2005

  • Accepted: 18 April 2006

  • Issue date: 01 August 2006

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.29.567

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • essential hypertension
  • antihypertensive drug
  • renal dysfunction
  • endothelial dysfunction
  • arteriosclerosis

This article is cited by

  • Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

    • Annabella Braschi

    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (2019)

  • Predictive factors and prevalence of microalbuminuria in HIV-infected patients: a cross-sectional analysis

    • Katia Falasca
    • Marta Di Nicola
    • Jacopo Vecchiet

    BMC Nephrology (2017)

  • The impact of angiotensin receptor blockers on arterial stiffness: a meta-analysis

    • Feng Peng
    • Hongming Pan
    • Wenquan Niu

    Hypertension Research (2015)

  • Reduction in blood pressure improves impaired nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension

    • Tatsuya Maruhashi
    • Ayumu Nakashima
    • Yukihito Higashi

    Hypertension Research (2015)

  • A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of telmisartan for flow-mediated dilatation

    • Hisato Takagi
    • Takuya Umemoto

    Hypertension Research (2014)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Guide to Authors
  • About the Editors
  • Message from Editors
  • Call for Paper
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe
  • Showcase of Graphical Abstracts on Hypertension Research

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Hypertension Research (Hypertens Res)

ISSN 1348-4214 (online)

ISSN 0916-9636 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited