Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Hypertension Research
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. hypertension research
  3. original article
  4. article
Improvement of Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients with Renal Diseases
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 April 2007

Improvement of Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients with Renal Diseases

  • Yuko Ohta1,
  • Kazuhiko Tsuruya1,
  • Koji Fujii1,
  • Masanori Tokumoto1,
  • Hidetoshi Kanai1,
  • Kiyoshi Matsumura1,
  • Takuya Tsuchihashi1,
  • Hideki Hirakata1 &
  • …
  • Mitsuo Iida1 

Hypertension Research volume 30, pages 295–300 (2007)Cite this article

  • 808 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

For hypertensive patients with renal diseases (RD), strict blood pressure (BP) control has been recommended in recent hypertension guidelines, such as JNC VI, JNC 7, WHO/ISH 1999 and ESH-ESC 2003. We assessed the current status of BP control and the changes of BP control before and after the publication of these guidelines in 489 hypertensive patients with or without RD (age, 19–89 years, mean 59±13 years) who visited the hypertension and kidney outpatient clinic at Kyushu University Hospital. The clinical characteristics of RD and non-RD patients were assessed (RD patients: age, 20–89 years, mean 60±13 years, n=311; non-RD patients: age, 19–86 years, mean 58±13 years, n=178). In addition, we compared the BP control status in 2003 to that in 1996. In 2003, the BP in RD patients was 134±16/78±10 mmHg and that in non-RD patients was 138±12/83±9 mmHg. When strict BP control was defined as <130/80 mmHg, the frequency of strict BP control in RD patients was 28.9% in 2003. In addition, the BP levels of RD patients in 2003 were significantly lower than those in 1996 (134±16/78±10 mmHg vs. 141±17/85±10 mmHg, p<0.05 for both systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), and the frequency of strict BP control in RD patients was higher in 2003 than in 1996 (28.9% vs. 11.8%, p<0.01). The BP levels of non-RD patients in 2003 tended to be lower than those in 1996 (138±12/83±9 mmHg vs. 141±13/85±9 mmHg, n.s.). In 2003, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were more frequently prescribed to RD patients than to non-RD patients. Furthermore, the use of ARBs was markedly increased in 2003 compared with 1996. In conclusion, in our outpatient clinic, BP levels in hypertensive patients with RD have improved in recent years, and were lower than those in hypertensive patients without RD, which may in part reflect the physicians' awareness of the importance of strict BP control in RD patients, as suggested by several recent hypertension guidelines.

Similar content being viewed by others

Prevalence and prognosis of refractory hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Article 13 January 2022

Blood pressure levels and risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide population-based study

Article Open access 06 March 2025

Association of blood pressure and renal outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease; a post hoc analysis of FROM-J study

Article Open access 22 July 2021

Article PDF

References

  1. Executive summary. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: S16–S41.

  2. Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Randall BL, et al: Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 13–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Locatelli F, Vecchio LD, D'amico M, Andrulli S : Is it the agent or the blood pressure level that matters for renal protection in chronic nephropathies? J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: S196–S201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al: Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755–1762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM, et al: Blood pressure control, proteinuria and the progression of renal diseases. The modification of diet in renal disease study. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 754–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker WG, Neaton JD, Cutler JA, Neuwirth R, Cohen JD, for the MRFIT Research Group: Renal function change in hypertensive members of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Racial and treatment effects. JAMA 1992; 268: 3085–3091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998; 317: 703–713.

  8. Guidelines Subcommittee : 1999 World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–183.

  9. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure : The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413–2446.

  10. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al: Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1206–1252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension Writing Group: 2003 World Health Organization (WHO) International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1983–1992.

  12. Ljutic D, Kes P : The role of arterial hypertension in the progression of non-diabetic glomerular diseases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: S28–S30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kojima S, Shida M, Yokoyama H : Comparison between cilnidipine and amlodipine besilate with respect to proteinuria in hypertensive patients with renal diseases. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 379–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agodoa L, Appel L, Bakris G, et al: Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 2719–2728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Viberti G, Wheeldon NM, for the Microalbuminuria Reduction with Valsartan (MARVAL) Study Investigators : Microalbuminuria reduction with valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A blood pressure–independent effect. Circulation 2002; 106: 672–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perico N, Spormann D, Peruzzi E, Bodin F, Sioufi A, Bertocchi F : Efficacy and tolerability of valsartan compared with lisinopril in patients with hypertension and renal insufficiency. Clin Drug Invest 1997; 14: 252–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, Zeeuw D, et al: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright JT, Bakris G, Greene T, et al: Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease. Results from the AASK Trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 2421–2431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Plum J, Bünten B, Németh R, Grabensee B : Effects of the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan on blood pressure, proteinuria, and renal hemodynamics in patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9: 2223–2234.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Jensen BR, Parving HH : Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 992–999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Segura J, Praga M, Campo C, Rodicio JL, Ruilope LM : Combination is better than monotherapy with ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist at recommended doses. JRAAS 2003; 4: 43–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Segura J, Christiansen H, Campo C, Ruilope LM : How to titrate ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in renal patients: according to blood pressure or proteinuria? Curr Hypertens Rep 2003; 5: 426–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giri S, Mahajan SK, Sen R, Sharma A : Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on renal function in patients of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. J Assoc Physicians India 2002; 50: 1245–1250.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell R, Sangalli F, Perticucci E, et al: Effects of combined ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II antagonist treatment in human chronic nephropathies. Kidney Int 2003; 63: 1094–1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuda H, Hayashi K, Homma K, et al: Differing anti-proteinuric action of candesartan and losartan in chronic renal disease. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 875–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, et al: National Kidney Foundation practice guideline for chronic kidney disease, evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Borzecki AM, Wong AT, Hickey EC, Ash AS, Berlowitz DR : Hypertension control. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2705–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Yuko Ohta, Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Koji Fujii, Masanori Tokumoto, Hidetoshi Kanai, Kiyoshi Matsumura, Takuya Tsuchihashi, Hideki Hirakata & Mitsuo Iida

Authors
  1. Yuko Ohta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuhiko Tsuruya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koji Fujii
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masanori Tokumoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hidetoshi Kanai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kiyoshi Matsumura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takuya Tsuchihashi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hideki Hirakata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mitsuo Iida
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Ohta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohta, Y., Tsuruya, K., Fujii, K. et al. Improvement of Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients with Renal Diseases. Hypertens Res 30, 295–300 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.295

Download citation

  • Received: 21 February 2006

  • Accepted: 12 December 2006

  • Issue date: 01 April 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.295

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • blood pressure control
  • new guidelines
  • renal diseases
  • angiotensin II receptor blockers
  • physicians' awareness
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Guide to Authors
  • About the Editors
  • Message from Editors
  • Call for Paper
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe
  • Showcase of Graphical Abstracts on Hypertension Research

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Hypertension Research (Hypertens Res)

ISSN 1348-4214 (online)

ISSN 0916-9636 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited