Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the discrepancy between clinic and home blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive subjects would disappear or diminish in magnitude if the BP measurement was taken under controlled conditions differing only with respect to location (clinic vs. home). Three hundred and sixty-seven patients aged 34−84 years with primary hypertension were enrolled. All of the patients or their spouses were taught to measure BP correctly with their own sphygmomanometer at home. The home BP value (HBP) was calculated as the average of 45 readings over 15 days. On days 6, 12, and 18 of the measurement period, rather than measuring their BP at home, patients and their spouses were asked to visit the hospital at the usual time of their BP measurement and to bring their own sphygmomanometer. The clinic BP value (CBP) was calculated as the average of the 9 readings taken on these visits by the patients or their spouses. The “white-coat phenomenon” (WCP) was considered to be present when the difference between the CBP and HBP was greater than 20/10 mmHg. The mean reading of home systolic/diastolic BP was 134.7/79.1 mmHg and the mean reading of clinic systolic/diastolic BP was 149.8/86.4 mmHg. In the total subject group, the prevalence rate of WCP was 31%−35% if the WCP was defined as ΔBP (CBP − HBP) ≥20 mmHg/10 mmHg. In conclusion, ruling out the influence of different factors, including time of day, the sphygmomanometer, the individual taking the BP measurement, the climate, and the patients' health or mood, the WCP was still found to exist to a statistically significant degree. This study indicated that teaching patients to measure their own BP at home is an effective procedure to obtain a more accurate result of their BP level. It also helped to involve the patients more actively in controlling their hypertension. (Hypertens Res 2008; 31: 37−41)
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Ayman D, Goldshine AD : Blood pressure determinations by subjects with essential hypertension I. The difference between clinic and home readings before treatment. Am J Med Sci 1940; 200: 465–474.
Materson BJ, Leclercq B : David Ayman, MD: an early investigator of clinical hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2005; 7: 218–223.
Mancia G, Sega R, Milesi C, Cesana G, Zanchetti Al : Blood pressure control in the hypertensive population. Lancet 1997; 349: 454–457.
Oikawa T, Obara T, Ohkubo T, et al, J-HOME Study Group : Characteristics of resistant hypertension determined by self-measured blood pressure at home and office blood pressure measurements: the J-HOME study. J Hypertens 2006; 24: 1737–1743.
Tachibana R, Tabara Y, Kondo I, Miki T, Kohara K : Home blood pressure is a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis than office blood pressure in community-dwelling subjects. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 633–639.
Muldoon MF, Nazzaro P, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Manuck SB : White-coat hypertension and carotid artery atherosclerosis: a matching study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1507–1512.
Murata T, Narita K, Hamada T, et al : White coat phenomenon, anxiety and endothelial function in healthy normotensive elderly subjects. Blood Press 2006; 15: 88–92.
Kaushik RM, Mahajan SK, Rajesh V, Kaushik R : Stress profile in essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 619–624.
Helvaci MR, Seyhanli M : What a high prevalence of white coat hypertension in society! Intern Med 2006; 45: 671–674.
Gerin W, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, et al : Assessment of the white-coat effect. J Hypertens 2006; 24: 67–74.
Den Hond E, Celis H, Vandenhoven G, O'Brien E, Staessen JA, THOP investigators : Determinants of white-coat syndrome assessed by ambulatory blood pressure or self-measured home blood pressure. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 37–40.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al : Prediction of stroke by self-measurement of blood pressure at home versus casual screening blood pressure measurement in relation to the Joint National Committee 7 classification: the Ohasama Study. Stroke 2004; 35: 2356–2361.
Kotsis V, Stabouli S, Pitiriga V, Toumanidis S, Papamichael C, Zakopoulos N : Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and target organ damage: effects of age and sex. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 9–15.
Erdogan D, Gullu H, Caliskan M, Yildirim I, Tok D, Muderrisoglu H : Coronary flow reserve is preserved in white-coat hypertension. Heart 2006; 92: 1109–1112.
Tseng YZ, Chiang FT, Hsu KL, et al : Low frequency of target organ damage in Taiwanese with white coat hypertension. J Formos Med Assoc 2005; 104: 327–332.
Fagard RH, Van Den Broeke C, De Cort P : Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older subjects in general practice. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19: 801–807.
Polonia JJ, Gama GM, Silva JA, Amaral C, Martins LR, Bertoquini SE : Sequential follow-up clinic and ambulatory blood pressure evaluation in a low risk population of white-coat hypertensive subjects and in normotensives. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10: 57–64.
Zhai Y, Hu JP, Kong LZ, Zhao WH, Chen CM : Economic burden of coronary heart disease and stroke attributable to hypertension in China. Chin J Epidemiol 2006; 27: 744–747.
Den Hond E, Staessen JA, Celis H, et al, Treatment of Hypertension Based on Home or Office Blood Pressure (THOP) Trial Investigators : Antihypertensive treatment based on home or office blood pressure—the THOP trial. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9: 311–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, N., Bu, M., Chen, D. et al. A Study of the White-Coat Phenomenon in Patients with Primary Hypertension. Hypertens Res 31, 37–41 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.31.37
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.31.37
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Target Blood Pressure Values in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention (2022)
