Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Hypertension Research
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. hypertension research
  3. original article
  4. article
The Study of Aortic Stiffness in Different Hypertension Subtypes in Dialysis Patients
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 April 2008

The Study of Aortic Stiffness in Different Hypertension Subtypes in Dialysis Patients

  • Li-Tao Cheng1,2,
  • Hui-Min Chen1,3,
  • Li-Jun Tang1,4,
  • Wen Tang1,
  • Hai-Yan Huang2,
  • Yue Gu1 &
  • …
  • Tao Wang1,2 

Hypertension Research volume 31, pages 593–599 (2008)Cite this article

  • 1362 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate whether differences in aortic stiffness are responsible for the differences in cardiovascular mortality among hypertension subtypes. Twenty hundred and fifty continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were included in the present study. They were classified into four groups: normotensives (n=92) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg; isolated systolic hypertensives (ISH, n=84) with SBP ≥140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg; isolated diastolic hypertensives (IDH, n=21) with SBP <140 mmHg and DBP ≥90 mmHg; and systolic-diastolic hypertensives (SDH, n=53) with SBP ≥140 mmHg and DBP ≥90 mmHg. Aortic stiffness was assessed by pulse pressure, central pressure parameters and pulse wave velocity. The IDH group had more male patients and a lower mean age than the other groups. The percentage of diabetes in the ISH group was higher than that in the other groups. The comparisons of aortic stiffness showed that the ISH and SDH groups had higher aortic stiffness than the normotension and IDH groups. The aortic stiffness in the ISH group was also higher than that in the SDH group, but there was no significant difference in aortic stiffness between the normotension and IDH groups. In conclusion, this study showed that aortic stiffness was significantly different among different hypertension subtypes, which might be an underlying cause of the differences in cardiovascular mortality among the hypertension subtypes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Hemodynamic profiles of arterial hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Article Open access 08 March 2023

Real-time dual prediction of intradialytic hypotension and hypertension using an explainable deep learning model

Article Open access 23 October 2023

Blood pressure, arterial waveform, and arterial stiffness during hemodialysis and their clinical implications in intradialytic hypotension

Article 16 December 2022

Article PDF

References

  1. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure : the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.

  2. Franklin SS, Jacobs MJ, Wong ND, L'Italien GJ, Lapuerta P : Predominance of isolated systolic hypertension among middle-aged and elderly US hypertensives: analysis based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Hypertension 2001; 37: 869–874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, et al: Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension 1995; 25: 305–313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, McGee DL : Perspectives on systolic hypertension. The Framingham study. Circulation 1980; 61: 1179–1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu L, Wang JG, Gong L, Liu G, Staessen JA : Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1823–1829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, et al: Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang J, Madhavan S, Cohen H, Alderman MH : Isolated diastolic hypertension. A favorable finding among young and middle-aged hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 1995; 26: 377–382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrovitch H, Curb JD, Bloom-Marcus E : Isolated systolic hypertension and risk of stroke in Japanese-American men. Stroke 1995; 26: 25–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hozawa A, Ohkubo T, Nagai K, et al: Prognosis of isolated systolic and isolated diastolic hypertension as assessed by self-measurement of blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3301–3306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strandberg TE, Salomaa VV, Vanhanen HT, Pitkala K, Miettinen TA : Isolated diastolic hypertension, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure as predictors of mortality during a follow-up of up to 32 years. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 399–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muntinga JH, Heesen WF, Smit AJ, Visser KR, May JF : Isolated systolic hypertension from a vascular point of view. J Vasc Res 2000; 37: 485–493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Rourke MF, Nichols WW : Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2005; 45: 652–658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ni Y, Wang H, Hu D, Zhang W : The relationship between pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure in Chinese patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 871–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pickering TG : Isolated diastolic hypertension. J Clin Hypertens 2003; 5: 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen CH, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, et al: Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension 1996; 27: 168–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, et al: Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation 1997; 95: 1827–1836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, et al: Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement: validation and clinical application study. Hypertension 1995; 26: 485–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka M, Babazono T, Takeda M, Iwamoto Y : Pulse pressure and chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertens Res 2006; 29: 345–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miyagi T, Muratani H, Kimura Y, et al: Increase in pulse pressure relates to diabetes mellitus and low HDL cholesterol, but not to hyperlipidemia in hypertensive patients aged 50 years or older. Hypertens Res 2002; 25: 335–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O'Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachojannis JA, Duprez D, Plante GE : Clinical application of arterial stiffness: definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 426–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Bortel LM, Duprez D, Starmans-Kool MJ, et al: Clinical applications of arterial stiffness, Task Force III: recommendations for user procedures. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 445–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M : Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 1989; 80: 1652–1659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O'Rourke MF, Mancia G : Arterial stiffness. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng LT, Tang LJ, Cheng L, Huang HY, Wang T : Limitation of the augmentation index for evaluating arterial stiffness. Hypertens Res 2007; 30: 713–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Millasseau SC, Patel SJ, Redwood SR, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ : Pressure wave reflection assessed from the peripheral pulse: is a transfer function necessary? Hypertension 2003; 41: 1016–1020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies JI, Struthers AD : Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 463–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pannier BM, Avolio AP, Hoeks A, Mancia G, Takazawa K : Methods and devices for measuring arterial compliance in humans. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 743–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM : Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 1999; 99: 2434–2439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al: Aortic stiffness is an independent risk predictor of all-cause and mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1236–1241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, et al: Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension 2002; 39: 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gordon G : Blood Pressure of Adults by Age and Sex, United States, 1960–62. National Center for Health Statistics, Series II, No. 4. Washington DC, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Drizd T, Dannenberg AL, Engel A : Blood pressure levels in persons 18–74 years of age in 1976–80, and trends in blood pressure from 1960 to 1980 in the United States. Vital Health Stat 1986; 11: 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sasaki R, Yamano S, Yamamoto Y, et al: Vascular remodeling of the carotid artery in patients with untreated essential hypertension increases with age. Hypertens Res 2002; 25: 373–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blank SG, Mann SJ, James GD, West JE, Pickering TG : Isolated elevation of diastolic blood pressure. Real or artifactual? Hypertension 1995; 26: 383–389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Franklin SS, Pio JR, Wong ND, et al: Predictors of new-onset diastolic and systolic hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2005; 111: 1121–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Enia G, Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA, et al: Long-term CAPD patients are volume expanded and display more severe left ventricular hypertrophy than haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 1459–1464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Katzarski KS, Charra B, Luik AJ, et al: Fluid state and blood pressure control in patients treated with long and short haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 369–375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China

    Li-Tao Cheng, Hui-Min Chen, Li-Jun Tang, Wen Tang, Yue Gu & Tao Wang

  2. Division of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China

    Li-Tao Cheng, Hai-Yan Huang & Tao Wang

  3. Division of Cardiology, the Second Clinical College of the Guangzhou University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Guangzhou, P.R. China

    Hui-Min Chen

  4. Division of Nephrology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, P.R. China

    Li-Jun Tang

Authors
  1. Li-Tao Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui-Min Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Jun Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wen Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hai-Yan Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yue Gu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, LT., Chen, HM., Tang, LJ. et al. The Study of Aortic Stiffness in Different Hypertension Subtypes in Dialysis Patients. Hypertens Res 31, 593–599 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.31.593

Download citation

  • Received: 16 April 2007

  • Accepted: 10 October 2007

  • Issue date: 01 April 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.31.593

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • hypertension
  • isolated diastolic hypertension
  • aortic stiffness
  • pulse wave velocity
  • peritoneal dialysis

This article is cited by

  • Association of waist-to-height ratio with hypertension and its subtypes in southern China

    • Peng Lu
    • Lingjuan Zhu
    • Xiaoshu Cheng

    Journal of Human Hypertension (2022)

  • Increased mean arterial pressure response to dynamic exercise in normotensive subjects with multiple metabolic risk factors

    • Nobuyuki Miyai
    • Maki Shiozaki
    • Mikio Arita

    Hypertension Research (2013)

  • Cardiovascular risk in the peritoneal dialysis patient

    • Raymond T. Krediet
    • Olga Balafa

    Nature Reviews Nephrology (2010)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Guide to Authors
  • About the Editors
  • Message from Editors
  • Call for Paper
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe
  • Showcase of Graphical Abstracts on Hypertension Research

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Hypertension Research (Hypertens Res)

ISSN 1348-4214 (online)

ISSN 0916-9636 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited