Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics of the study participants

From: Effects of calcium channel blocker-based combinations on intra-individual blood pressure variability: post hoc analysis of the COPE trial

 

Benidipine plus ARB (n=1026)

Benidipine plus BB (n=966)

Benidipine plus TD (n=991)

P-value

Demographic

 Sex, male

520 (50.7%)

480 (49.7%)

495 (49.9%)

0.899

 Age, years

63.0±10.6

63.3±10.7

63.5±10.6

0.594

Baseline characteristics

 BMI, kg m−2

24.7±3.4

24.6±3.4

24.4±3.4

0.209

 Systolic BP, mm Hg

153.8±11.8

153.6±10.7

154.2±12.0

0.491

 Diastolic BP, mm Hg

89.0±9.7

88.5±9.6

88.5±9.8

0.362

 Heart rate, beats per min

74.0±11.1

74.3±11.0

74.2±11.5

0.865

Risk factors

 Previous cardiovascular disease

131 (12.8%)

110 (11.4%)

129 (13.0%)

0.500

 Previous stroke

31 (3.0%)

23 (2.4%)

23 (2.3%)

0.546

 Diabetes

144 (14.0%)

137 (14.2%)

143 (14.4%)

0.968

 Dyslipidemia

400 (39.0%)

391 (40.5%)

418 (42.2%)

0.344

 Current smoking

399 (38.9%)

376 (38.9%)

390 (39.4%)

0.972

Previous medication

 Antihypertensive agents

824 (80.3%)

780 (80.7%)

803 (81.0%)

0.919

 Benidipine

647 (63.1%)

620 (64.2%)

632 (63.8%)

0.870

 Other CCB

120 (11.7%)

109 (11.3%)

113 (11.4%)

0.957

 ARB

94 (9.2%)

93 (9.6%)

95 (9.6%)

0.925

 ACE inhibitor

17 (1.7%)

22 (2.3%)

13 (1.3%)

0.255

 BB

23 (2.2%)

35 (3.6%)

33 (3.3%)

0.165

 Diuretics

9 (0.9%)

8 (0.8%)

13 (1.3%)

0.494

Concomitant medication

 Anti-platelet agents

88 (8.6%)

72 (7.5%)

77 (7.8%)

0.631

 Statin

174 (17.0%)

170 (17.6%)

159 (16.0%)

0.653

 Antidiabetic agents

71 (6.9%)

68 (7.0%)

72 (7.3%)

0.954

  1. Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BB, β-blocker; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CCB, calcium channel blocker; TD, thiazide diuretic.
  2. Data are shown as the number of patients (%) or the mean±s.d. Differences in the proportions among the three treatment groups were analyzed using the χ2-test, and differences in the means among the three treatment groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.