Abstract
The present study was conducted to investigate the significance of small colony variants (SCVs) in biofilm life cycle of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). All of these MRSA and MSSA isolates were recovered from different food commodities. Molecular typing showed that 21 MRSA isolates carry SCCmecA type IV and belong to agr type II. Out of 15 MSSA isolates, 7 were found to carry agr type II, 5 agr type I and 2 agr type III. All of the MRSA isolates studied adopted biofilm mode of growth after exposure to sublethal doses of oxacillin. MSSA isolates, on the other hand, were biofilm producers by nature, that is, without exposure to any stress. The biomass of the biofilm reaches its maximum thickness after 48 h of incubation at 35 °C. It was noticed that biofilm population consists of wild type and SCVs. Moreover, the number of SCVs increases with the age of biofilm. The SCVs of MRSA were unable to readopt biofilm mode of growth independently, irrespective of the presence or absence of oxacillin. The SCVs of MSSA, on the other hand, quickly revert to normal life just after a single subculture and show biofilm formation without any stress. Molecular studies showed a parallel reduction in the expression of the genes icaA, sigβ and sarA, and also in the extracellular matrix production in SCVs of MRSA. This might be due to oxacillin as it seems to be a stress factor responsible for induction of biofilm formation in MRSA isolates. Contrary to the wild type, SCVs are metabolically inactive and do not respond to oxacillin, which is only active against the growing cells. Therefore, stress-responsive genes, that is, sigβ and sarA, are not induced. Conversely, MSSA isolates are natural biofilm producers without induction through any known factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Costerton, W. et al. The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1466–1477 (2003).
Gotz, F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1367–1378 (2000).
Parsek, M. R. & Singh, P. K. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 677–701 (2003).
Stoodley, P. et al. Direct demonstration of viable Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an infected total joint arthroplasty. A case report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90, 1751–1758 (2008).
Yarwood, J. M., Paquette, K. M., Tikh, I. B., Volper, E. M. & Greenberg, E. P. Generation of virulence factor variants in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7961–7967 (2007).
Lewis, K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 48–56 (2007).
Lewis, K. Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 70, 267–274 (2005).
Proctor, R. A., Balwit, J. M. & Vesga, O. Variant sub-populations of Staphylococcus aureus as cause of persistent and recurrent infections. Infect. Agents Dis. 3, 302–312 (1994).
Higashi, J. M. & Sullam, P. M. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms In Biofilms Infection, and Antimicrobial Therapy eds Pace J. L., Rupp M. E., Finch R. G., 81–108 Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, (2006).
Gilot, P., Lina, G., Cochard, T. & Poutrel, B. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 4060–4067 (2002).
O’Neill, E. et al. Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from device related infections. J.Clin. Microbiol. 45, 1379–1388 (2007).
Valle, J. et al. SarA and not sigβ is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 1075–1087 (2003).
Mariana, N. S., Salman, S. A., Neela, V. & Zamberi, S. Evaluation of modified Congo red agar for detection of biofilm produced by clinical isolates of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 3, 330–338 (2009).
Mirani, Z. A. & Jamil, N. Effect of sub-lethal doses of vancomycin and oxacillin on biofilm formation by vancomycin intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Basic Microbiol. 51, 191–195 (2011).
Allegrucci, M. & Sauer, K. Characterization of colony morphology variants isolated from Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 189, 2030–2038 (2007).
Bayston, R., Ashraf, W. & Smith, T. Triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressed as small colony variants: a novel mode of evasion of susceptibility to antiseptics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 848–853 (2007).
Chen, X., Zhang, M., Zhou, C., Kallenbach, N. R. & Ren, D. Control of bacterial persister cells by Trp/Arg-containing antimicrobial peptides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4878–4885 (2011).
Mahami, T., Adu-Gyamfi, A. & Owulah, C. Comparative susceptibility of in vitro biofilm and planktonic cells of Staphylococcus aureus to antimicrobials. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4, 1209–1214 (2010).
Merle, E. O., Douglas, W., Morck, K., Andre, G. & Ronald, R. R. Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Can. J. Veter. Res. 66, 86–92 (2002).
Nuryastuti, T. et al. Effect of cinnamon oil on icaA expression and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 6850–6855 (2009).
Black, C. C. et al. The role of mecA and blaZ regulatory elements in mecA expression by regional clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet. Microbiol. 151, 345–353 (2011).
Chan, P. F., Foster, S. J., Ingham, E. & Clements, M. O. The Staphylococcus aureus alternative sigma factor sigmaB controls the environmental stress response but not starvation survival or pathogenicity in a mouse abscess model. J. Bacteriol. 180, 6082–6089 (1998).
Tormo, M. A. et al. SarA is an essential positive regulator of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2348–2356 (2005).
Shang, W., Davies, T. A., Flamm, R. K. & Bush, K. Effects of ceftobiprole and oxacillin on mecA expression in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 956–959 (2010).
Xie, Y. et al. Genotypes and toxin gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from China. PLoS ONE 6, e28276 (2011).
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108 (2004).
Haaber, J., Cohn, M. T., Frees, D., Andersen, T. J. & Ingmer, H. Planktonic aggregates of Staphylococcus aureus protect against common antibiotics. PLoS ONE 7, e41075 (2012).
Lewis, K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 999–1007 (2001).
Wingender, J. & Flemming, H. C. Biofilms in drinking water and their role as reservoir for pathogens. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 214, 417–423 (2011).
Mirani, Z. A. et al. Biofilm formation and dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus under the influence of oxacillin. Microb. Pathog. 61–62, 66–72 (2013).
La Tourette Prosser, B., Taylor, D., Dix, B. A. & Cleeland, R. Method of evaluating effects of antibiotics on bacterial biofilm. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31, 1502–1506 (1987).
Singh, R., Ray, P., Das, A. & Sharma, M. Role of persisters and small-colony variants in antibiotic resistance of planktonic and biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro study. J. Med. Microbiol. 58, 1067–1073 (2009).
Lewis, K. Persister cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 357–372 (2010).
Haussler, S. Biofilm formation by the small colony variant phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 546–551 (2004).
Latimer, J., Forbes, S. & McBain, A. J. Attenuated virulence and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus following sublethal exposure to triclosan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 3092–3100 (2012).
Beenken, K. E., Blevins, J. S. & Smeltzer, M. S. Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 71, 4206–4211 (2003).
Rachid, S. et al. Alternative transcription factor sB is involved in regulation of biofilm expression in a Staphylococcus aureus mucosal isolate. J. Bacteriol. 182, 6824–6826 (2000).
Kiedrowski, M. R. et al. Nuclease modulates biofilm formation in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 6, e26714 (2011).
Mitchell, G. et al. A role for sigma factor B in the emergence of Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants and elevated biofilm production resulting from an exposure to aminoglycosides. Microb. Pathog. 48, 18–27 (2010).
Lauderdale, K. J., Boles, B. R., Cheung, A. L. & Horswill, A. R. Interconnections between Sigma B, agr, and proteolytic activity in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation. Infect. Immun. 77, 1623–1635 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Mr Yousf Khan, Laboratory Engineer, Central Research Laboratory, University of Karachi, for providing Scanning Electron Microscopy and RT-PCR facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirani, Z., Aziz, M. & Khan, S. Small colony variants have a major role in stability and persistence of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Antibiot 68, 98–105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2014.115
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2014.115
This article is cited by
-
Antibacterial fatty acids destabilize hydrophobic and multicellular aggregates of biofilm in S. aureus
The Journal of Antibiotics (2017)
