In the version of this article initially published online, several errors appeared in the HTML version. In the section “EISA recovers the role of transcription during neurogenesis,” the expression “(t1/2 = 1/α)” should have read “(t1/2 ∼ 1/α)” in the sentence “mRNA half-life, on the other hand, is inversely proportional to the degradation rate (t1/2 = 1/α).” In the Online Methods, “Analysis of circadian dynamics data sets,” the symbol “<-” was given as “≤” in two cases and as “≤<” in one case; the formulas “coeffs ≤ lm(y ∼ cbind(cos(w*t),-sin(w*t)))$coefficients”; “C ≤< sqrt(coeffs[2]^2 + coeffs[3]^2)”; “ϕ ≤ atan2(coeffs[3],coeffs[2])” should have been “coeffs <- lm(y ∼ cbind(cos(w*t),-sin(w*t)))$coefficients”; “C <- sqrt(coeffs[2]^2 + coeffs[3]^2)”; “ϕ <- atan2(coeffs[3],coeffs[2]).” In addition, the corresponding authors are Dimos Gaidatzis, Lukas Burger and Michael Stadler, rather than Dimos Gaidatzis, Lukas Burger and Maria Florescu.The errors have been corrected in HTML version of this article.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nbt.3269
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaidatzis, D., Burger, L., Florescu, M. et al. Erratum: Analysis of intronic and exonic reads in RNA-seq data characterizes transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Biotechnol 34, 210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0216-210a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0216-210a
