Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Letter 2: Chloroplast-transgenic plants are not a gene flow panacea

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bilang R and Potrykus I. 1998. Nature Biotechnology 16: 333–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniell, H. et al. 1998. Nature Biotechnology 16 :345–348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Avni, A. and Edelman, M. 1991. Mol. Gen. Genet. 225: 273–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Szmit, A. et al. 1987. Plant Mol. Biol. 9: 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, S. 1989. J. Hered. 80: 214–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dally, A. and Second, G. 1988. RGN 5: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corriveau, J. et al. 1981. Curr. Genet. 16: 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erikson, L. and Kemble, R. 1990. Mol. Gen. Genet. 222: 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, J. Letter 2: Chloroplast-transgenic plants are not a gene flow panacea. Nat Biotechnol 16, 401 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0598-401b

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0598-401b

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing