Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Who should receive antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP?

Abstract

Infectious complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are rare but can be major. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in this setting is not clear and clinical practice varies widely. In this Practice Point commentary, I discuss the findings and limitations of a study by Cotton and colleagues, which investigated a sequential quality improvement approach over 11 years for antibiotic prophylaxis of infection after ERCP. The authors made several changes in practice over the study period leading to a dramatic reduction in use of antibiotics. In the final phase, antibiotics were given only to 26% of patients, but this group probably represents those patients who really benefit from prophylaxis. The study by Cotton et al. underlines that the findings of randomized, controlled trials should be adopted in practice, but that findings should be critically analyzed with selective changes in practice taken over time on the basis of clever analysis of clinical studies and local practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Freeman ML (2002) Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2: 147–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Struelens MJ et al. (1993) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia after biliary endoscopy: an outbreak investigation using DNA macrorestriction analysis. Am J Med 95: 489–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kozarek RA et al. (1999) Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 39–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Devière J et al. (1990) Septicemia after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Endoscopy 22: 72–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Motte S et al. (1991) Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting. Gastroenterology 101: 1374–1381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton PB et al. (2008) Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc 67: 471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van den Hazel SJ et al. (1996) Biliary excretion of ciprofloxacin and piperacillin in the obstructed biliary tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40: 2658–2660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Byl B et al. (1995) Antibiotic prophylaxis for infectious complications after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Infect Dis 20: 1236–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Hazel SJ et al. (1996) Piperacillin to prevent cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 125: 442–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devière, J. Who should receive antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 594–595 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1262

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1262

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing