Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli

Abstract

The effects of mutations on phenotype and fitness may depend on the environment (phenotypic plasticity), other mutations (genetic epistasis) or both. Here we examine the fitness effects of 18 random insertion mutations in E. coli in two resource environments and five genetic backgrounds. We tested each mutation for plasticity and epistasis by comparing its fitness effects across these ecological and genetic contexts. Some mutations had no measurable effect in any of these contexts. None of the mutations had effects on phenotypic plasticity that were independent of genetic background. However, half the mutations had epistatic interactions such that their effects differed among genetic backgrounds, usually in an environment-dependent manner. Also, the pattern of mutational effects across backgrounds indicated that epistasis had been shaped primarily by unique events in the evolutionary history of a population rather than by repeatable events associated with shared environmental history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Plasticity and epistasis of mutations illustrated and tested.
Figure 2: Epistasis reflecting repeatable versus contingent historical effects illustrated and tested.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wade, M.J. Epistasis as a genetic constraint within populations and an accelerant of adaptive divergence among them. in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (eds. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D.I. & Wade, M.J.) 213–231 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wade, M.J. & Goodnight, C.J. The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52, 1537–1553 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Otto, S.P. & Feldman, M.W. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Pop. Biol. 51, 134–147 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, T.F. & Wagner, G.P. Epistasis and the mutation load: a measurement theoretical approach. Genetics 158, 477–485 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kondrashov, F.A. & Kondrashov, A.S. Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12089–12092 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitlock, M.C., Phillips, P.C., Moore, F.B.-G. & Tonsor, S.J. Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 601–629 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dean, A.M. A molecular investigation of genotype by environment interactions. Genetics 139, 19–33 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fedorowicz, G.M., Fry, J.D., Anholt, R.R. & Mackay, T.F.C. Epistatic interactions between smell-impaired loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148, 1885–1891 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dykhuizen, D.E. & Hartl, D.L. Functional effects of PGI allozymes in Escherichia coli. Genetics 105, 1–18 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenski, R.E. et al. Epistatic effects of promoter and repressor functions of the Tn10 tetracycline-resistance operon on the fitness of Escherichia coli. Mol. Ecol. 3, 127–135 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Visser, J.A.G.M., Hoekstra, R.F. & van den Ende, H. Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution 51, 1499–1505 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elena, S.F. & Lenski, R.E. Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390, 395–398 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elena, S.F., Ekunwe, L., Hajela, N., Oden, S.A. & Lenski, R.E. Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetica 102/103, 349–358 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elena, S.F. & Lenski, R.E. Epistasis between new mutations and genetic background, and a test of genetic canalization. Evolution 55, 1746–1752 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Remold, S.K. & Lenski, R.E. Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11388–11393 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kishony, R. & Leibler, S. Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations. J. Biol. 2, 14 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, J.H. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York, USA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kleckner, N., Bender, J. & Gottesman, S. Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. Meth. Enzymol. 204, 139–180 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenski, R.E., Rose, M.R., Simpson, S.C. & Tadler, S.C. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315–1341 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Travisano, M. & Lenski, R.E. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IV. Targets of selection and the specificity of adaptation. Genetics 143, 15–26 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Travisano, M. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. VI. Environmental constraints on adaptation and divergence. Genetics 146, 471–479 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmalhausen, I.I. Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection (Blakiston, Philadelphia, USA, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Podlich, D.W. & Cooper, M. Modelling plant breeding programs as search strategies on a complex response surface. in Simulated Evolution and Learning (eds. McKay, B., Yao, X., Newton, C.S., Kim, J.-H. & Furuhashi, T.) 171–178 (Springer, Canberra, Australia, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lenski, R.E. & Travisano, M. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6808–6814 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lenski, R.E., Winkworth, C.L. & Riley, M.A. Rates of DNA sequence evolution in experimental populations of Escherichia coli during 20,000 generations. J. Mol. Evol. 56, 498–508 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lenski, R.E. Phenotypic and genomic evolution during a 20,000-generation experiment with the bacterium, Escherichia coli. Plant Breed. Rev. 24, 225–265 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levin, B.R., Stewart, F.M. & Chao, L. Resource-limited growth, competition and predation: a model and experimental studies with bacteria and bacteriophage. Am. Nat. 111, 3–24 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. SAS System for Mixed Models (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. Biometry (Freeman, New York, USA, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Elena and M. Travisano for sharing strains; N. Hajela for technical support; C. Borland, T. Cooper, H. Eisthen, B. Lundrigan, P. Moore and M. Travisano for valuable comments; and R. Wolfinger and C. Duarte for statistical advice. This work was supported by a fellowship from the US National Institutes of Health to S.K.R. and a grant from the National Science Foundation to R.E.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanna K Remold.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Remold, S., Lenski, R. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 36, 423–426 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1324

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing