Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Prospects
  • Published:

Prospect

Nature volume 450, page 1273 (2007)Cite this article

Grant review has to evolve along with the science it scrutinizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gene Russo, acting editor of Naturejobs,

    Gene Russo

Authors
  1. Gene Russo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Getting in the frame

Prospects

Training peer reviewers

resourse

What to Expect from the New NIH Peer Review

Nature's peer review debate

Related external links

American Society for Cell Biology

NIH Peer Review Advisory Commission

EU Seventh Framework Research programme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, G. Prospect. Nature 450, 1273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7173-1273a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7173-1273a

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing