Abstract
Stored memories enter a temporary state of vulnerability following retrieval known as ‘reconsolidation’, a process that can allow memories to be modified to incorporate new information. Although reconsolidation has become an attractive target for treatment of memories related to traumatic past experiences, we still do not know what new information triggers the updating of retrieved memories. Here, we used biochemical markers of synaptic plasticity in combination with a novel behavioral procedure to determine what was learned during memory reconsolidation under normal retrieval conditions. We eliminated new information during retrieval by manipulating animals’ training experience and measured changes in proteasome activity and GluR2 expression in the amygdala, two established markers of fear memory lability and reconsolidation. We found that eliminating new contextual information during the retrieval of memories for predictable and unpredictable fear associations prevented changes in proteasome activity and glutamate receptor expression in the amygdala, indicating that this new information drives the reconsolidation of both predictable and unpredictable fear associations on retrieval. Consistent with this, eliminating new contextual information prior to retrieval prevented the memory-impairing effects of protein synthesis inhibitors following retrieval. These results indicate that under normal conditions, reconsolidation updates memories by incorporating new contextual information into the memory trace. Collectively, these results suggest that controlling contextual information present during retrieval may be a useful strategy for improving reconsolidation-based treatments of traumatic memories associated with anxiety disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Alberini CM, Chen DY (2012). Memory enhancement: consolidation, reconsolidation and insulin-like growth factor 2. Trends Neurosci 35: 274–283.
Alberini CM, Ledoux JE (2013). Memory reconsolidation. Curr Biol 23: R746–R750.
Ben Mamou C, Gamache K, Nader K (2006). NMDA receptors are critical for unleashing consolidated auditory fear memories. Nat Neurosci 9: 1237–1239.
Clem RL, Huganir RL (2010). Calcium-permeable AMPA receptor dynamics mediate fear memory erasure. Science 330: 1108–1112.
Debiec J, Doyere V, Nader K, Ledoux JE (2006). Directly reactivated, but not indirectly reactivated, memories undergo reconsolidation in the amygdala. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 3428–3433.
Diaz-Mataix L, Ruiz Martinez RC, Schafe GE, Ledoux JE, Doyere V (2013). Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories. Curr Biol 23: 467–472.
Finnie PS, Nader K (2012). The role of metaplasticity mechanisms in regulating memory destabilization and reconsolidation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36: 1667–1707.
Gilmartin MR, Kwapis JL, Helmstetter FJ (2013a). NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in the prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex differentially mediate trace, delay, and contextual fear conditioning. Learn Mem 20: 290–294.
Gilmartin MR, Miyawaki H, Helmstetter FJ, Diba K (2013b). Prefrontal activity links nonoverlapping events in memory. J Neurosci 33: 10910–10914.
Helmstetter FJ, Fanselow MS (1989). Differential second-order aversive conditioning using contextual stimuli. Anim Learn Behav 17: 205–212.
Hong I, Kim J, Lee S, Ko HG, Nader K, Kaang BK et al (2013). AMPA receptor exchange underlies transient memory destabilization on retrieval. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 8218–8223.
Inda MC, Muravieva EV, Alberini CM (2011). Memory retrieval and the passage of time: from reconsolidation and strengthening to extinction. J Neurosci 31: 1635–1643.
Jarome TJ, Helmstetter FJ (2013a). The ubiquitin-proteasome system as a critical regulator of synaptic plasticity and long-term memory formation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 105: 107–116.
Jarome TJ, Kwapis JL, Ruenzel WL, Helmstetter FJ (2013b). CaMKII, but not protein kinase A, regulates Rpt6 phosphorylation and proteasome activity during the formation of long-term memories. Front Behav Neurosci 7: 115.
Jarome TJ, Kwapis JL, Werner CT, Parsons RG, Gafford GM, Helmstetter FJ (2012). The timing of multiple retrieval events can alter GluR1 phosphorylation and the requirement for protein synthesis in fear memory reconsolidation. Learn Mem 19: 300–306.
Jarome TJ, Werner CT, Kwapis JL, Helmstetter FJ (2011). Activity dependent protein degradation is critical for the formation and stability of fear memory in the amygdala. PloS One 6: e24349.
Kwapis JL, Jarome TJ, Schiff JC, Helmstetter FJ (2011). Memory consolidation in both trace and delay fear conditioning is disrupted by intra-amygdala infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin. Learn Mem 18: 728–732.
Lee JL (2008). Memory reconsolidation mediates the strengthening of memories by additional learning. Nat Neurosci 11: 1264–1266.
Lee SH, Choi JH, Lee N, Lee HR, Kim JI, Yu NK et al (2008). Synaptic protein degradation underlies destabilization of retrieved fear memory. Science 319: 1253–1256.
Monfils MH, Cowansage KK, Klann E, LeDoux JE (2009). Extinction-reconsolidation boundaries: key to persistent attenuation of fear memories. Science 324: 951–955.
Nader K, Schafe GE, Le Doux JE (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406: 722–726.
Parsons RG, Gafford GM, Helmstetter FJ (2006). Translational control via the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is critical for the formation and stability of long-term fear memory in amygdala neurons. J Neurosci 26: 12977–12983.
Parsons RG, Ressler KJ (2013). Implications of memory modulation for post-traumatic stress and fear disorders. Nat Neurosci 16: 146–153.
Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned Reflexes: an Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. London, London: Oxford University Press.
Rao-Ruiz P, Rotaru DC, van der Loo RJ, Mansvelder HD, Stiedl O, Smit AB et al (2011). Retrieval-specific endocytosis of GluA2-AMPARs underlies adaptive reconsolidation of contextual fear. Nat Neurosci 14: 1302–1308.
Schiller D, Monfils MH, Raio CM, Johnson DC, Ledoux JE, Phelps EA (2010). Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms. Nature 463: 49–53.
Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M (2013). Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced amnesia for learned fear. Science 339: 830–833.
Tronson NC, Wiseman SL, Olausson P, Taylor JR (2006). Bidirectional behavioral plasticity of memory reconsolidation depends on amygdalar protein kinase A. Nat Neurosci 9: 167–169.
Urcelay GP, Miller RR (2014). The functions of contexts in associative learning. Behav Processes 104: 2–12.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grants R01-06558 (FJH) and F31-088125 (TJJ) and the American Psychological Foundation (TJJ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarome, T., Ferrara, N., Kwapis, J. et al. Contextual Information Drives the Reconsolidation-Dependent Updating of Retrieved Fear Memories. Neuropsychopharmacol 40, 3044–3052 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.161
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.161
This article is cited by
-
Muscarinic receptor activation overrides boundary conditions on memory updating in a calcium/calmodulin-dependent manner
Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
-
Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm
Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
-
GluR2 endocytosis-dependent protein degradation in the amygdala mediates memory updating
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Updating Procedures Can Reorganize the Neural Circuit Supporting a Fear Memory
Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
