Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Precedings
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature precedings
  3. articles
  4. article
Estimating body Mass and Nutritional Status from Subadult Hominin Skeletons
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Manuscript
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 November 2008

Estimating body Mass and Nutritional Status from Subadult Hominin Skeletons

  • Gwendolyn Robbins1 

Nature Precedings (2008)Cite this article

  • 389 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Hominin body size and shape are key components to reconstructing phylogeny, life history, adaptation, and behavior in ancestral populations^1^. For adults, geometric properties of the femoral midshaft cross-section are used to infer locomotor behavior^2-5^, subsistence practices^6-7^, and functional adaptations^8-10^. Recently research has focused on patterns of compact bone ontogeny, particularly in regard to changes in bone strength with the acquisition of bipedal locomotion^11-13^ and examining population differences in ontogenetic trajectories for subadult humans^14-16^ and Neandertals^16^. Because femoral midshaft geometry is primarily shaped by biomechanical strains-weight bearing, locomotion, and muscle action-ontogenetic research requires estimates of body mass from the skeleton. Currently we use the width of the distal end of the femur to estimate subadult body mass but articular ends are constrained by pressures for joint congruence. Here I demonstrate the strong and consistent scaling relationship between body mass and femoral torsional strength (J) derived from measurement of midshaft cross-section geometry. Bone ends are most significantly affected by locomotor strain during the second year of life, during the initial acquisition of obligate bipedalism, after that time they are increasingly constrained by joint congruence. Results of a comparison of body mass for body size in prehistoric populations support the hypothesis that the midshaft is also a more sensitive indicator of population differences in body mass and activity levels during ontogeny. The femoral midshaft can be used to detect starvation and growth disruption in past populations because there is a mechano-biological interaction effect whereby disruptions in nutritional, metabolic and hormonal status lead to low body mass and activity levels^1, 11-13, 17-22^.

Similar content being viewed by others

Physiological and lifestyle determinants of bone mass in minority children/adolescents from the MetA-Bone Trial

Article 06 February 2025

Correlation between sedentary activity, physical activity and bone mineral density and fat in America: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2018

Article Open access 21 June 2023

Sex differences in physical activity dose-response effects on site-specific bone mineral density during childhood and adolescence

Article Open access 16 May 2025

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University, North Carolina, USA

    Gwendolyn Robbins

Authors
  1. Gwendolyn Robbins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwendolyn Robbins.

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robbins, G. Estimating body Mass and Nutritional Status from Subadult Hominin Skeletons. Nat Prec (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2468.1

Download citation

  • Received: 04 November 2008

  • Accepted: 07 November 2008

  • Published: 07 November 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2468.1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • compact bone ontogeny
  • functional adaptation
  • hominids
  • Malnutrition
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Precedings (Nat Preced)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing