Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Recent advances in the discovery and delivery of vaccine adjuvants

Key Points

  • Adjuvant is a term used to describe a variety of components co-administered with a vaccine that enhance the immunogenicity of vaccine antigens. These components can be broadly divided into two subsets on the basis of their dominant mechanism of action: delivery systems and immune potentiators.

  • The cells, receptors and signalling pathways of the innate immune system are important targets for improved delivery systems and immune potentiators. The integrated model of host defence indicates that optimal generation of antigen-specific memory (the goal of vaccination) requires innate immune activation.

  • Recent advances in elucidating the mechanisms of innate immune activation and the links between innate and adaptive responses have shown that numerous natural and synthetic compounds possess specific immune-potentiating activities. These compounds have promise as next generation vaccine adjuvants.

  • The identification of the imidizaquinoline class of SMIPs (small-molecule immune potentiators) as Toll-like receptor-dependent indicate that the small-molecule platform could be exploited for immune potentiator design and discovery.

  • Vaccine delivery systems are used to ensure that the antigens and immune potentiators included in a vaccine are able to interact with the appropriate tissues or cells to promote the induction of a potent immune response. Biodegradable microparticles are proving to be attractive delivery systems for both vaccine antigens and adjuvants.

  • Mucosal vaccine delivery systems are specifically designed to allow vaccines to be successfully applied to mucosal surfaces, mostly involving oral or intranasal administration. Important elements of mucosal delivery systems include components designed to protect antigens from degradation and to promote their interaction with mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue.

Abstract

Adjuvant design has historically had a touch of alchemy at its heart due to its reliance on the complex biology of innate immune activation. However, a new mechanistic understanding of innate immunity, combined with new adjuvant and delivery platforms for exploiting this knowledge, has led to significant advances recently. Although many challenges remain, the field is moving rapidly and the proper tools and methodologies are in place for the use of traditional drug discovery engines in guiding the development of vaccine adjuvants. In this review, we outline the current trends in immune potentiator, delivery system and adjuvant design that will shape the vaccines of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The three components of optimal subunit vaccines.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Figure 2: The integrated model of vaccine efficacy.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Figure 3: Antigen-presenting cells serve as the bridge between innate and antigen-specific responses.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Figure 4: Representation of a cationic poly(lactide co-glycolide) (PLG) microparticle (1 μm mean size) with adsorbed DNA on the surface.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Figure 5: A schematic representation of LT.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Figure 6: In vitro and in vivo toxicity of various mutants of heat-labile enterotoxin from Escherichia coli.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO World Health Report (2002).

  2. Singh, M. & O'Hagan, D. T. Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants. Pharm. Res. 19, 715–728 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P. & Janeway, C. A. Jr. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 388, 394–397 (1997). A landmark publication providing the mechanistic framework for innate immune recognition strategies in mammals.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takeda, K., Kaisho, T. & Akira, S. Toll-like receptors. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 21, 335–376 (2003). A recent and comprehensive review of the rapidly advancing field of Toll-like receptor biology.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C. A. Jr. An ancient system of host defense. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 12–15 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Hagan, D. & Valiante, N. M. Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems. Pharmaceutical News (in the press).

  7. Banchereau, J. & Steinman, R. M. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245–252 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cella, M., Sallusto, F. & Lanzavecchia, A. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 10–16 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Banchereau, J. et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 18, 767–811 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins, M. K. & Schwartz, R. H. Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 165, 302–319 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bachmann, M. F. et al. The influence of antigen organization on B cell responsiveness. Science 262, 1448–1451 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jegerlehner, A. et al. A molecular assembly system that renders antigens of choice highly repetitive for induction of protective B cell responses. Vaccine 20, 3104–3112 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernasconi, N. L., Traggiai, E. & Lanzavecchia, A. Maintenance of serological memory by polyclonal activation of human memory B cells. Science 298, 2199–2202 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, N., Ohnishi, N., Ni, L., Akira, S. & Bacon, K. B. CpG directly induces T-bet expression and inhibits IgG1 and IgE switching in B cells. Nature Immunol. 4, 687–693 (2003). This paper, along with reference 13, demonstrates how the TLR9-dependent immune potentiator CpG directly activates B cells and both amplifies and steers their primary and memory responses to antigens.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gantner, B. N., Simmons, R. M., Canavera, S. J., Akira, S. & Underhill, D. M. Collaborative induction of inflammatory responses by Dectin-1 and Toll-like receptor 2. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1107–1117 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bouchon, A., Facchetti, F., Weigand, M. A. & Colonna, M. TREM-1 amplifies inflammation and is a crucial mediator of septic shock. Nature 410, 1103–1107 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cella, M. et al. Maturation, activation, and protection of dendritic cells induced by double-stranded RNA. J. Exp. Med. 189, 821–829 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Basu, S., Binder, R. J., Ramalingam, T. & Srivastava, P. K. CD91 is a common receptor for heat shock proteins gp96, hsp90, hsp70, and calreticulin. Immunity 14, 303–313 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Royle, M. C., Totemeyer, S., Alldridge, L. C., Maskell, D. J. & Bryant, C. E. Stimulation of Toll-Like receptor 4 by lipopolysaccharide during cellular invasion by live Salmonella typhimurium is a critical but not exclusive event leading to macrophage responses. J. Immunol. 170, 5445–5454 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nau, G. J., Schlesinger, A., Richmond, J. F. & Young, R. A. Cumulative toll-like receptor activation in human macrophages treated with whole bacteria. J. Immunol. 170, 5203–5209 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemmi, H. et al. Small anti-viral compounds activate immune cells via the TLR7 MyD88-dependent signaling pathway. Nature Immunol. 3, 196–200 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jurk, M. et al. Human TLR7 or TLR8 independently confer responsiveness to the antiviral compound R-848. Nature Immunol. 3, 499 (2002). References 21 and 22 demonstrate the Toll-like receptor-dependence of the imidizaquinoline class of small-molecule immune potentiators.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasilakos, J. P. et al. Adjuvant activities of immune response modifier R-848: comparison with CpG ODN. Cell. Immunol. 204, 64–74 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vogel, F. R. & Powell, M. F. in Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach (eds Powell, M. F. & Newman, M. J.) 141–228 (Plenum, New York, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Zinkernagel, R. M. et al. Antigen localisation regulates immune responses in a dose- and time-dependent fashion: a geographical view of immune reactivity. Immunol. Rev. 156, 199–209 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Edelman, R. in New Generation Vaccines Vol. 2 (Eds Levine, M. M., Woodrow, G. C., Kaper, J. B. & Cobon, G. S.) 173–192 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kenney, R. T. & Edelman, R. Survey of human-use adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2, 165–188 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ott, G. in Vaccine Adjuvants: Preparation Methods and Research Protocols (ed. O'Hagan, D.) 211–228 (Humana, Totowa, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dupuis, M. et al. Immunization with the adjuvant MF59 induces macrophage trafficking and apoptosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 31, 2910–2918 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peppoloni, S. et al. Mutants of the Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin as safe and strong adjuvants for intranasal delivery of vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2, 285–293 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Keefer, M. C. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of Env 2-3, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 candidate vaccine, in combination with a novel adjuvant, MTP-PE/MF59. NIAID AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 12, 683–693 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ott, G. in Vaccine Design: The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach (eds Powell, M. F. & Newman, M. J.) 229–248 (Plenum, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson, O. L. et al. A month-long effect from a single injection of microencapsulated human growth hormone. Nature Med. 2, 795–799 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Randolph, G. J., Inaba, K., Robbiani, D. F., Steinman, R. M. & Muller, W. A. Differentiation of phagocytic monocytes into lymph node dendritic cells in vivo. Immunity 11, 753–761 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. O'Hagan, D. & Singh, M. Microparticles as vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2, 269–283 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwendeman, S. P. Recent advances in the stabilization of proteins encapsulated in injectable PLGA delivery systems. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 19, 73–98 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kazzaz, J., Neidleman, J., Singh, M., Ott, G. & O'Hagan, D. T. Novel anionic microparticles are a potent adjuvant for the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against recombinant p55 gag from HIV-1. J. Control Release 67, 347–356 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Otten, G. R. et al. Induction of broad and potent anti-HIV immune responses in rhesus macaques by priming with a DNA vaccine and boosting with protein-adsorbed PLG microparticles. J. Virol. 77, 6087–6092 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh, M., Briones, M., Ott, G. & O'Hagan, D. Cationic microparticles: a potent delivery system for DNA vaccines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 811–816 (2000). A novel approach for adsorbing DNA vaccines onto the surface of cationic microparticles prepared from a biodegradable and biocompatible polymer. The formulation enhances the potency of DNA vaccination substantially.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. O'Hagan, D. et al. Induction of potent immune responses by cationic microparticles with adsorbed HIV DNA vaccines. J. Virol. 75, 9037–9043 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Denis-Mize, K. S. et al. Plasmid DNA adsorbed onto cationic microparticles mediates target gene expression and antigen presentation by dendritic cells. Gene Ther. 7, 2105–2112 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh, M. et al. Cationic microparticles are an effective delivery system for immune stimulatory CpG DNA. Pharm. Res. 18, 1476–1479 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Michalek, S. M., O'Hagan, D. & Gould-Fogerite, S. in Mucosal Immunology 2nd edn (eds Ogra, P. L., Mestecky, J., Lamm, M. E., Strober, W., Bienenstock, J. & McGhee, J. R.) 759–778 (Academic, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rappuoli, R., Pizza, M., Douce, G. & Dougan, G. Structure and mucosal adjuvanticity of cholera and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins. Immunol. Today 20, 493–500 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Baudner, B. C. et al. Enhancement of protective efficacy following intranasal immunization with vaccine plus a nontoxic LTK63 mutant delivered with nanoparticles. Infect. Immun. 70, 4785–4790 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh, M., Briones, M. & O'Hagan, D. T. A novel bioadhesive intranasal delivery system for inactivated influenza vaccines. J. Control Release 70, 267–276 (2001). This study shows how synergy can be achieved by use of a bioadhesive delivery system to enhance the potency of a vaccine co-administered with a mucosal adjuvant for intranasal immunization.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ugozzoli, M., Mariani, M., Del Giudice, G., Soenawan, E. & O'Hagan, D. T. Combinations of protein polysaccharide conjugate vaccines for intranasal immunization. J. Infect. Dis. 186, 1358–1361 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Barackman, J. D., Ott, G., Pine, S. & O'Hagan, D. T. Oral administration of influenza vaccine in combination with the adjuvants LT-K63 and LT-R72 induces potent immune responses comparable to or stronger than traditional intramuscular immunization. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8, 652–657 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. O'Hagan, D. Microparticles and polymers for the mucosal delivery of vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 34, 305–320 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Katz, D. E. et al. Oral immunization of adult volunteers with microencapsulated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) CS6 antigen. Vaccine 21, 341–346 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Canter, J. et al. An outbreak of hepatitis B associated with jet injections in a weight reduction clinic. Arch. Intern. Med. 150, 1923–1927 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jackson, L. A. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of varying dosages of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered by needle-free jet injectors. Vaccine 19, 4703–4709 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen, D. et al. Epidermal immunization by a needle-free powder delivery technology: immunogenicity of influenza vaccine and protection in mice. Nature Med. 6, 1187–1190 (2000). This paper establishes that protective immunity can be achieved using dry powder vaccines in a needle-free device for immunization.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Parent du Chatelet, I. et al. Clinical immunogenicity and tolerance studies of liquid vaccines delivered by jet-injector and a new single-use cartridge (Imule): comparison with standard syringe injection. Imule Investigators Group. Vaccine 15, 449–458 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Epstein, J. E. et al. Safety, tolerability, and lack of antibody responses after administration of a PfCSP DNA malaria vaccine via needle or needle-free jet injection, and comparison of intramuscular and combination intramuscular/intradermal routes. Hum. Gene Ther. 13, 1551–1560 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Roy, M. J. et al. Induction of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, T helper cells, and protective levels of antibody in humans by particle-mediated administration of a hepatitis B virus DNA vaccine. Vaccine 19, 764–778 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mikszta, J. A. et al. Improved genetic immunization via micromechanical disruption of skin-barrier function and targeted epidermal delivery. Nature Med. 8, 415–419 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Matriano, J. A. et al. Macroflux microprojection array patch technology: a new and efficient approach for intracutaneous immunization. Pharm. Res. 19, 63–70 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Glenn, G. M., Rao, M., Matyas, G. R. & Alving, C. R. Skin immunization made possible by cholera toxin. Nature 391, 851 (1998). This study introduced the concept of transcutaneous immunization, whereby vaccines are applied topically to the skin. So, no breaching of the protective skin barrier with a needle or other device is required.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Glenn, G. M. et al. Transcutaneous immunization: a human vaccine delivery strategy using a patch. Nature Med. 6, 1403–1406 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Guerena-Burgueno, F. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a prototype enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine administered transcutaneously. Infect. Immun. 70, 1874–1880 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Scharton-Kersten, T. et al. Transcutaneous immunization with bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins, subunits, and unrelated adjuvants. Infect. Immun. 68, 5306–5313 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Guebre-Xabier, M. et al. Immunostimulant patch containing heat-labile enterotoxin from Escherichia coli enhances immune responses to injected influenza virus vaccine through activation of skin dendritic cells. J. Virol. 77, 5218–5225 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Dilraj, A. et al. Response to different measles vaccine strains given by aerosol and subcutaneous routes to schoolchildren: a randomised trial. Lancet 355, 798–803 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Giuliani, M. M. et al. Mucosal adjuvanticity and immunogenicity of LTR72, a novel mutant of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin with partial knockout of ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1123–1132 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Giannelli, V. et al. Protease susceptibility and toxicity of heat-labile enterotoxins with a mutation in the active site or in the protease-sensitive loop. Infect. Immun. 65, 331–334 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of our colleagues in Chiron for their research efforts and ideas. In particular, we thank M. Giulianni, M. Grazia Pizza, R. Rappuoli and G. Del Giudice for the toxicity data on the LT mutants. In addition, we acknowledge the contributions of our colleagues in the Vaccine Delivery Group at Chiron, Emeryville, USA. Finally, we thank N. Cronen for manuscript formatting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek T. O'Hagan.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

LocusLink

CD14

CD80

CD86

CD91

Dectin1

TLR1

TLR2

TLR3

TLR4

TLR5

TLR6

TLR7

TLR8

TLR9

TLR10

TREM1

TREM2

FURTHER INFORMATION

Encyclopedia of Life Sciences

vaccination

vaccines: presentation

vaccines: subunit

Glossary

ADJUVANT

The functional definition of diverse components co-administered with vaccine antigens that enhance antigen-specific immune responses in vivo.

INNATE IMMUNITY

The system of rapid host defence that has evolved to respond to broad and highly conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).

IMMUNE POTENTIATOR

A natural or synthetic compound which directly activates immune cells through specific receptors and/or pathways.

DELIVERY SYSTEM

A vaccine formulation that localizes vaccine antigens and/or immune potentiators, and targets them to key immune cell types.

IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY

The long-lived protective immunity elicited by vaccines and many naturally occurring infections, which is mediated by expanded populations of previously activated B and T cells selected for their expression of specific receptors for the antigens of a given pathogen.

TOLL-LIKE RECEPTORS

(TLRs). An evolutionarily conserved family of pattern-recognition receptors that detect unique microbial products and allow rapid activation of innate immunity.

MICROPARTICLES

Particulate carrier systems in the micron size range, normally prepared with synthetic polymers, which can be used as delivery systems for drugs or vaccines that are usually trapped within the particles.

MF59

An oil-in-water microemulsion adjuvant which has been approved in Europe for use in combination with influenza vaccine in the elderly (Fluad).

POLY(LACTIDE CO-GLYCOLIDE)

(PLG). A biodegradable and biocompatible synthetic polymer that has been used to prepare a number of successfully marketed drug delivery systems.

HEAT-LABILE ENTEROTOXIN

(LT). A bacterial toxin secreted from Escherichia coli which is potently immuno-stimulatory when applied to mucosal surfaces and can also act as an adjuvant for co-administered antigens. However, the molecule is also the causative agent of traveller's diarrhoea.

TRANSCUTANEOUS IMMUNIZATION

Involves the topical application of vaccines, usually in a specially designed patch, and mediates effective immunization without penetrating the protective layer of the skin with a device or needle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Hagan, D., Valiante, N. Recent advances in the discovery and delivery of vaccine adjuvants. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2, 727–735 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1176

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1176

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing