Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. brief communications
  4. article
Accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and fibrinogen compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating pneumonia from acute bronchitis in primary care
Download PDF
  • Brief Communication
  • Published: 27 March 2009

Accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and fibrinogen compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating pneumonia from acute bronchitis in primary care

  • Rogier M Hopstaken1,2,
  • Jochen WL Cals1 &
  • Geert-Jan Dinant1 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 18, pages 227–230 (2009)Cite this article

  • 1086 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Aims:

To assess the diagnostic value of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and fibrinogen compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) for pneumonia in primary care patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).

Methods:

Receiver operating characteristic curves summarising test accuracies for LBP, fibrinogen and CRP for pneumonia were constructed. The respective areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared with that of body temperature, an acknowledged clinical sign to differentiate pneumonia from acute bronchitis in primary care.

Results:

11 of 95 patients had radiographically confirmed pneumonia (11.7%). The AUC was 0.90 for CRP, 0.92 for LBP and 0.86 for fibrinogen. Body temperature yielded an AUC of 0.63. Differences between the AUCs were not significant for the three blood tests, but highly significant when compared to body temperature (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

LBP and fibrinogen are equally strong predictors of pneumonia in patients with LRTI, but they do not perform better than CRP.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

C-reactive protein (CRP) evaluation in human urine using optical sensor supported by machine learning

Article Open access 14 August 2024

Integrating a host biomarker with a large language model for diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection

Article Open access 16 December 2025

Lung microbiome on admission in critically ill patients with acute bacterial and viral pneumonia

Article Open access 18 October 2023

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Practice, Maastricht University Medical Centre, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), The Netherlands

    Rogier M Hopstaken, Jochen WL Cals & Geert-Jan Dinant

  2. Foundation of Primary Health Care Centres, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Rogier M Hopstaken

Authors
  1. Rogier M Hopstaken
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jochen WL Cals
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geert-Jan Dinant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogier M Hopstaken.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopstaken, R., Cals, J. & Dinant, GJ. Accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and fibrinogen compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating pneumonia from acute bronchitis in primary care. Prim Care Respir J 18, 227–230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2009.00011

Download citation

  • Received: 13 June 2008

  • Revised: 12 November 2008

  • Accepted: 17 December 2008

  • Published: 27 March 2009

  • Issue date: September 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2009.00011

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Moderate vs. mild cases of overseas-imported COVID-19 in Beijing: a retrospective cohort study

    • Wenliang Zhai
    • Zujin Luo
    • Yingmin Ma

    Scientific Reports (2021)

  • Clinical features for diagnosis of pneumonia among adults in primary care setting: A systematic and meta-review

    • Tha Pyai Htun
    • Yinxiaohe Sun
    • Junxiong Pang

    Scientific Reports (2019)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing