Abstract
Aims:
A renewed interest in lung age is evidenced by recent smoking cessation publications. This research compares the original Morris lung age equations (1985) with contemporary Australian lung age equations.
Methods:
Both lung age equations were applied to the spirometry results of two sub-groups (never-smokers n=340, and current smokers n=50) from an independent dataset. Means of both lung age estimates were compared to the mean of the chronological age of each group by paired Student's t-test.
Results:
The Morris lung age estimates were paradoxically lower (younger) than chronological age in both groups. The new Australian equation produced lung age estimates that were equivalent to chronological age in the never-smoker group and significantly higher (older) than chronological age in the current smoker group.
Conclusions:
These results strongly suggest that the Morris lung age equations are in need of review. The use of contemporary lung age equations may translate into greater success for smoking cessation programs. The new Australian equations seem to possess internal validity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newbury, W., Newbury, J., Briggs, N. et al. Exploring the need to update lung age equations. Prim Care Respir J 19, 242–247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2010.00029
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2010.00029
This article is cited by
-
Estimation of lung age via a spline method and its application in chronic respiratory diseases
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2022)
-
Novel equations better predict lung age: a retrospective analysis using two cohorts of participants with medical check-up examinations in Japan
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2015)
