Abstract
In Japan, germline BRCA1/2 genetic testing is extensively used for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). However, inconclusive results sometimes complicate clinical management. In this study, we identified an intronic SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) insertion in BRCA1 of a proband and her mother, both of whom had inconclusive conventional BRCA1/2 genetic test results, by targeted long-read sequencing (LRS) through the application of nanopore adaptive sampling and Flongle genome amplicon sequencing. We further confirmed splicing aberrations using cDNA quantitative PCR with TaqMan probes and Flongle cDNA amplicon sequencing. Our findings highlighted that, in addition to conventional BRCA1/2 genetic testing, structural variation analysis using targeted LRS is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis of HBOC in certain cases. Furthermore, Flongle amplicon sequencing was demonstrated to be effective for sequencing regions refractory to conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing, particularly repetitive and GC-rich regions, such as retrotransposons.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ueki A, Yoshida R, Kosaka T, Matsubayashi H. Clinical risk management of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostatic cancers for BRCA1/2 variant carriers in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2023;68:517–26.
Maheu C, Vodermaier A, Rothenmund H, Gallinger S, Ardiles P, Semotiuk K, et al. Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning. Fam Cancer. 2010;9:617–24.
Hendrickson BC, Judkins T, Ward BD, Eliason K, Deffenbaugh AE, Burbidge LA, et al. Prevalence of five previously reported and recurrent BRCA1 genetic rearrangement mutations in 20,000 patients from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;43:309–13.
Nakamura W, Hirata M, Oda S, Chiba K, Okada A, Mateos RN, et al. Assessing the efficacy of target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing through hereditary cancer patient genomes. NPJ Genom Med. 2024;9:11.
Yano N, Chong PF, Kojima KK, Miyoshi T, Luqman-Fatah A, Kimura Y, et al. Long-read sequencing identifies an SVA_D retrotransposon insertion deep within the intron of ATP7A as a novel cause of occipital horn syndrome. J Med Genet. 2024;61:950–8.
Kawakami R, Hiraide T, Watanabe K, Miyamoto S, Hira K, Komatsu K, et al. RNA sequencing and target long-read sequencing reveal an intronic transposon insertion causing aberrant splicing. J Hum Genet. 2024;69:91–9.
Miller DE, Sulovari A, Wang T, Loucks H, Hoekzema K, Munson KM, et al. Targeted long-read sequencing identifies missing disease-causing variation. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:1436–49.
Akamatsu S, Mitsuhashi S, Soga K, Mizukami H, Shiraishi M, Frith MC, et al. Targeted nanopore sequencing using the Flongle device to identify mitochondrial DNA variants. Sci Rep. 2024;14:25161.
Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, et al. The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7:3.
Aneichyk T, Hendriks WT, Yadav R, Shin D, Gao D, Vaine CA, et al. Dissecting the causal mechanism of X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism by integrating genome and transcriptome assembly. Cell. 2018;172:897–909.e21.
Dias Nunes J, Demeestere I, Devos M. BRCA mutations and fertility preservation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;25:204.
Chenais B. Transposable elements in cancer and other human diseases. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15:227–42.
Arribas YA, Baudon B, Rotival M, Suárez G, Bonté P-E, Casas V, et al. Transposable element exonization generates a reservoir of evolving and functional protein isoforms. Cell. 2024;187:7603–20.e22.
Ismail T, Alzneika S, Riguene E, Al-Maraghi S, Alabdulrazzak A, Al-Khal N, et al. BRCA1 and its vulnerable C-terminal BRCT domain: structure, function, genetic mutations and links to diagnosis and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:333.
Coquelle N, Green R, Glover JNM. Impact of BRCA1 BRCT domain missense substitutions on phosphopeptide recognition. Biochemistry. 2011;50:4579–89.
Lee MS, Green R, Marsillac SM, Coquelle N, Williams RS, Yeung T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of missense variations in the BRCT domain of BRCA1 by structural and functional assays. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4880–90.
Attig J, Ruiz de Los Mozos I, Haberman N, Wang Z, Emmett W, Zarnack K, et al. Splicing repression allows the gradual emergence of new Alu-exons in primate evolution. Elife. 2016;5:e19545.
Sela N, Kim E, Ast G. The role of transposable elements in the evolution of non-mammalian vertebrates and invertebrates. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R59.
Petrozziello T, Dios AM, Mueller KA, Vaine CA, Hendriks WT, Glajch KE, et al. SVA insertion in X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism alters histone H3 acetylation associated with TAF1 gene. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0243655.
Bozsik A, Pócza T, Papp J, Vaszkó T, Butz H, Patócs A, et al. Complex characterization of germline large genomic rearrangements of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in high-risk breast cancer patients-novel variants from a large national center. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4650.
Ewald IP, Ribeiro PLI, Palmero EI, Cossio SL, Giugliani R, Ashton-Prolla P. Genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2: a literature review. Genet Mol Biol. 2009;32:437–46.
Yukishige S, Inoue H, Inui T, Sasa S, Misaki M, Goto M, et al. Three cases of inconclusive as results of BRCA genetic testing. J Hered Tumors. 2024;24:147–52. (in Japanese).
Acknowledgements
We thank the proband and her family for participating in this study. We also thank Tomoko Kozaki at Kitasato University, Eri Nonoyama and Miki Uchiyama at St. Marianna University School of Medicine, and LSI Medience Corporation for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED, No. ek0109617) (YY) and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI under grant numbers JP24K18897 (SO). Finally, we thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SO: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, methodology, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, review, and editing. MW, KF, TS, NA, RK, KT and FT: resources, writing—original draft, review, and editing. OM: methodology, writing—original draft, review, and editing. SM: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, review, and editing. YY: methodology, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, review, and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ohori, S., Waraya, M., Fujisaki, K. et al. Hidden SVA retrotransposon insertion in BRCA1 revealed by nanopore targeted sequencing causes hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Hum Genet 70, 503–508 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-025-01365-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-025-01365-7
This article is cited by
-
The role of Alu elements in causing BRCA1 structural variation and breast cancer susceptibility
Genes & Genomics (2025)


