Table 1 Features of prime editor variants.

From: Emerging trends in prime editing for precision genome editing

Type

Cas protein

Components

Editing frequency

pegRNA type

Features

Study

PE1

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

RT (M-MLV RT), pegRNA

~10–20% in HEK293T cells

Linear pegRNA

Initial version of prime editing, demonstrated proof of concept for search-and-replace genome editing

Anzalone et al.14

PE2

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

Improved RT (M-MLV RT), enhanced pegRNA design

~20–40% in HEK293T cells

Linear pegRNA

Increased editing efficiency compared with PE1, optimized RT for higher processivity and stability

PE3

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

RT (M-MLV RT), pegRNA, additional sgRNA for nicking the nonedited strand

~30–50% in HEK293T cells

Linear pegRNA

Introduced dual nicking to enhance editing efficiency, promotes usage of the edited strand as a template for repair

PE4

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

RT (M-MLV RT), pegRNA, dominant-negative MLH1 (MLH1dn) to inhibit MMR

~50–70% in HEK293T cells

Linear pegRNA

Increased editing efficiency by suppressing MMR pathways, reduced indel formation

Chen et al.30

PE5

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

RT (M-MLV RT), pegRNA, additional sgRNA for nicking the nonedited strand, dominant-negative MLH1 (MLH1dn)

~60–80% in HEK293T cells

Linear pegRNA

Enhanced efficiency and precision by inhibiting MMR pathways and using additional sgRNA to nick the nonedited strand

PE6

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

Modified RT (M-MLV RT, PE6d), new compact RT variants (PE6a, PE6b, PE6c), enhanced Cas9 variants (PE6e, PE6f, PE6g), epegRNAs

~70–90% in HEK293T cells

epegRNA

Variants with compact RT for better delivery, stabilized pegRNAs to reduce degradation

Doman et al.41

PE7

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

Modified RT (M-MLV RT), epegRNAs, La(1–194) protein fused to prime editor complex

~80–95% in HEK293T cells

epegRNA with La protein

Improved pegRNA stability and editing efficiency, enhanced editing outcomes in challenging cell types

Yan et al.42

Cas12a PE

Nickase Cas12a (R1226A)

RT (M-MLV RT)-MCP, circular RNA for reverse transcription-MS2, crRNA for targeting

Up to 40.75% in HEK293T cells

Circular pegRNA (cpegRNA)

Smaller size compared with Cas9-based systems, preferential targeting of T-rich PAMs, enhanced stability and reduced degradation by circular RNA, potential for multiplex editing

Liang et al.38

DPE

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

MCP-fused DNA-dependent DNA polymerase (phi29), DNA polymerase editing template (DPET) including MS2 loop

Up to 60% in HEK293T cells

Additional DNA template with gRNA

Uses DNA polymerase instead of RT; separate DNA template is easily synthesized and modifiable for cellular stability

Liu et al.45

CE

Nickase Cas9 (H840A)

DNA-dependent DNA polymerase, click DNA (clkDNA), HUH endonuclease domain

Up to 25.2% in HCT116 cells

Additional DNA template with gRNA

Ferreira da Silva et al.46

  1. This table provides a comparative overview of different prime editing systems, ranging from PE1 to PE7, Cas12a-based prime editors and DNA polymerase-based genome editing tools.