Table 8 Summary of multiple linear regression models predicting overall perception in Suzhou (N = 20) and Kyoto (N = 20)
Suzhou | Kyoto | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Estimate | ||
Text-Natural element | Greening | 0.3466 | 0.1062 |
Flower | 0.0673 | 0.1043 | |
Water/Mountain/Stone | −0.032 | 0.0779 | |
Animal | −0.0267 | 0.1388 | |
Natural phenomenon | −0.0415 | −0.0184 | |
Season | 0.0755 | 0.0942 | |
Pseudo R²:0.22 | Pseudo R²:0.36 | ||
Artificial element | Architecture | 0.1366 | 0.1162 |
Cultural facilities | −0.2453 | −0.0115 | |
Landscape structure | 0.0104 | 0.1288 | |
Space/interior | −0.055 | 0.0271 | |
Service | −0.2424 | −0.0886 | |
Cost/Fee | −0.0898 | −0.0812 | |
FestivaI Activities | 0.1221 | 0.0622 | |
Crowd | −0.0298 | 0.1027 | |
Pseudo R²: 0.3 | Pseudo R²: 0.27 | ||
Multi-sensory | Vision | 0.4069 | 0.107 |
Hearing | −0.0635 | 0.1571 | |
Olfactory/taste | −0.1286 | 0.0448 | |
Feeling | −0.0875 | 0.0651 | |
Pseudo R²: 0.29 | Pseudo R²: 0.253 | ||
Photos | Sky | 0.0053 | 0.1123 |
Vegetation | −0.02 | 0.1031 | |
Mountain | 0.0278 | −0.1747 | |
Water | 0.0583 | −0.2333 | |
Architecture | −0.0211 | −0.0993 | |
Interior | −0.0292 | −0.0939 | |
Structure | 0.1164 | −0.3388 | |
Road | −0.0785 | −0.173 | |
Transportation | 0.4476 | −1.1192 | |
People | −0.0516 | −0.2333 | |
Pseudo R²: 0.214 | Pseudo R²: 0.253 |