Table 11 Multi-Group analysis by occupation

From: How generative AI shapes user perceived value and adoption intention in digital museum experiences

Paths

Non-professional User (n = 407)

Professional User (n = 319)

P (Difference)

Results

β

P

β

P

SR → PV

0.128

0.059

0.070

0.348

0.565

No

CA → PV

0.178

0.008

0.066

0.427

0.292

No

PU → PV

0.071

0.282

0.162

0.041

0.371

No

PE → PV

0.153

0.040

0.042

0.649

0.352

No

PN → PV

0.029

0.691

0.296

0.000

0.011

Significant

RA → PV

0.089

0.115

0.105

0.122

0.856

No

SP → PV

-0.034

0.609

0.089

0.273

0.239

No

HC → PV

-0.036

0.547

-0.007

0.933

0.783

No

CO → PV

-0.123

0.056

-0.108

0.155

0.881

No

PR → PV

-0.158

0.003

0.044

0.534

0.022

Significant

PV → AI

0.866

0.000

0.862

0.000

0.941

No

PI → AI

0.123

0.022

0.190

0.000

0.371

No

IN → AI

-0.816

0.000

-0.811

0.000

0.956

No

IN x PV → AI

0.386

0.000

0.288

0.000

0.214

No

PI x PV → AI

0.478

0.000

0.445

0.000

0.620

No

  1. SR semantic relevance, CA contextual adaptability, PU perceived usefulness, PE perceived enjoyment, PN perceived novelty, RA relative advantage, SP service personalization, HC habit change, CO complexity, PR perceived risk, PV perceived value, AI adoption intention, PI perceived innovativeness, IN interactivity.