Table 3 Agreement between estimated activity energy expenditure from the HPFVM quadratic models with those derived from doubly labelled water

From: Estimating energy expenditure from wrist and thigh accelerometry in free-living adults: a doubly labelled water study

Placement

Activity energy expenditure (kJ day−1 kg−1)

Total energy expenditure (MJ day−1)

N

Biasa

95% LoA

r

RMSE

N

Biasa

95% LoA

r

RMSE

Dominant wrist

97

−1.9

−26.0

22.2

0.644

12.4

97

−0.3

−2.2

1.7

0.903

1.0

Non-dominant wrist

97

−1.5

−25.1

22.1

0.676

12.1

97

−0.3

−2.1

1.6

0.911

1.0

Thigh

91

−4.2

−29.6

21.2

0.599

13.6

91

−0.5

−2.7

1.7

0.874

1.2

Both wrists

94

−1.9

−25.1

21.3

0.669

11.9

94

−0.3

−2.1

1.6

0.911

1.0

Non-dominant wrist & Thigh

89

−3.3

−26.2

19.6

0.687

12.1

89

−0.4

−2.3

1.5

0.909

1.0

Dominant wrist & Thigh

88

−3.5

−27.2

20.1

0.644

12.5

88

−0.4

−2.4

1.5

0.902

1.1

Both wrists & Thigh

86

−3.4

−25.9

19.2

0.675

11.9

86

−0.4

−2.2

1.4

0.914

1.0

  1. aBias estimates in bold are statistically significant at p < 0.05 (none of the TEE estimates were statistically significantly different)