Table 2 Epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents based on the diagnostic criteria from the IDF, Cook et al. [6], Ford et al. [26], and de Ferranti et al. [27].

From: The prevalence of pediatric metabolic syndrome—a critical look on the discrepancies between definitions and its clinical importance

Author

Year

Country

Study cohort

Study design

IDF criteria

Modified NCEP criteria

N

Age (years)

Europe

 Ostrihoňová et al. [58]

2017

Slovak Republic

1294

10–17.99

Visitors of Health Advice Centers no randomization

♂2.7% ♀2.8%

 

 Vanlancker et al. [18]

2017

10 European Countries

1004

12.5–17

Randomized multicenter study not population-representative

2.7%

Cook 3.5%

 Galera-martínez et al. [48]

2015

Spain

379

12–16.9

Population-based sample of adolescents living in Almería

3.8%

Ford 5.7%

 Ahrens et al. [40]

2014

8 European Countries

12,319

2–10.9

Population-based not nationally representative

0.4%

Cook 1.4%

North America

  Reina et al. [64]

2017

USA

1137

10–16

Population-based study of Latino/Hispanic people living in the US; SOL youtha

3.1% (10–15) ♂2.8% (16) ♀6.3% (16)

 

 Rodríguez et al. [37]

2016

USA

1623

12–19

Nationally representative sample of adolescents; NHANESb 2005–2012

5.4%

 

 MacPherson et al. [46]

2016

Canada

1228

10–18

Population representative survey; CHMSc 2007–2009, 2009–2011

2.1%

 

  Miller et al. [20]

2014

USA

3495

12–19

Nationally representative sample of adolescents; NHANES 2001–2010

 

Ford 10.1%

South America

 Reuter et al. [80]

2018

Brazil

1200

12–17

Population representative sample of adolescents from Southern Brazil

2.1%

Cook 1.9% de Ferranti 5.0%

 Ramírez-Vélez et al. [32]

2016

Colombia

1922

9–17.9

Population-based sample of school children in Bogota; FUPRECOLd study 2014–2015

0.3%

Cook 6.2% Ford 7.8% de Ferranti 11.0%

 Suarez-Ortegón et al. [50]

2016

Colombia

494

5–9

Cross-sectional study of the scholar population in the city of Cali; IFRECNTECe study

 

de Ferranti 8.7%

 Kuschnir et al. [31]

2016

Brazil

37,504

12–19

Representative of adolescents from medium- and large-sized cities; ERICAf Study

2.6%

 

 Burrows et al. [38]

2015

Chile

667

12–17

Adolescents of low to middle SE-status residing in the city of Santiago not population representative

9.5%

 

  Villalobos Reyes et al. [43]

2014

Venezuela

916

9–18

Representative sample in the city of Mérida; CREDEFARg Study 2010–2011

1.5%

Cook 2.2%

 Dias Pitangueira et al. [41]

2014

Brazil

540

7–14

Random sample from the municipality of Mutuípe, Brazil

 

de Ferranti12.8%

 Agudelo et al. [51]

2014

Colombia

851

10–18

Beneficiaries of a health-promotion company in the city of Medellín no randomization

0.9%

Cook 3.8% Ford 4.1% de Ferranti 11.4%

Asia

  Song et al. [42]

2017

China

831

7–18

“National household-based study in nine Chinese provinces;” CHNSh 2009

1.4% (10–18)

Cook 3.4% (7–18) 3.6% (10–18)

  Xu et al. [57]

2017

China

11,174

10–17

Population survey conducted in six provinces in 2007–2011

 

Cook 3.8%

 Lee et al. [60]

2017

South Korea

623

10–18

Population representative; KNHANESi

1.0%

 

 Asghari et al. [33]

2017

Iran

1424

11–18

Randomly selected, population representative; TLGSj, baseline 1999

8.4%

Cook 13.1% de Ferranti 26.4%

 Bahrani et al. [35]

2016

Iran

538

14–18

Random sampling procedure. 12 high schools in Shiraz, Iran

 

Cook 6.1%

  Kim et al. [52]

2016

Korea

2330

10–18

Population representative; KNHANES 2010–2012

2.1%

Ford 5.7%

 Wang et al. [44]

2015

China

1770

7–17

Random sample of 10 schools in urban area of Guangzhou, China

1.1% (10–17)

Cook 2.5% (7–17)

 Al-Hussein et al. [36]

2014

Saudi Arabia

2 149

6–17

Random sample of students in Riyadh; S.Ch.O.O.Lsk study

2.0%

Cook and Ford 4.9% de Ferranti 17.5%

 Fadzlina et al. [49]

2014

Malaysia

1014

13

Population-based study; students from urban and rural schools

2.6%

 

 Li et al. [39]

2014

China

910

11–16

Students from 30 high-school classes in North East China

7.6%

 

 Hosseinpanah et al. [34]

2013

Iran

1424

11–18

Randomized, population representative; TLGS, baseline 1999–2001

 

Cook 13.3%

Australia

  Huang et al. [81]

2013

Australia

964

17

Representative sample of adolescents from Western Australia

2.7%

 

Africa

 Sekokotla et al. [30]

2017

South Africa

371

13–18

Selected high schools in Mthatha, South Africa

 

Cook ♂6.0% ♀3.1%

  Benmohammed et al. [47]

2015

Algeria

989

12–18

Randomized recruitment of school children in the city of Constantine

♂ 1.3% ♀ 0.5%

Cook ♂2.6% ♀0.6% de Ferranti ♂4.0% ♀2.0%

  Matsha et al. [45]

2013

South Africa

1272

10–16

Randomly selected from primary schools 2007–2008

1.9%

 
  1. aStudy of Latino Youth.
  2. bNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
  3. cCanadian Health Measures Survey.
  4. dIn Spanish Associación de la Fuerza Prensil con Manifestaciones de Riesgo Cardiovascular Tempranas en Niños y Adolescentes Colombianos.
  5. eIdentification of risk factors for adult non-communicable chronic disease in schooled population.
  6. fEstudo de Riscos Cardiovasculares em Adolescentes (study of cardiovascular risk in adolescents).
  7. gEvaluation of growth, development, and cardio-metabolic risk factors in school children and adolescents from Mérida, Venezuela.
  8. hChina Health and Nutrition Survey.
  9. iKorea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
  10. jTeheran Lipid and Glucose Study.
  11. kSaudi Children’s Overweight, Obesity and Lifestyles Study.