Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Behavior, Psychology and Sociology

Efficacy and acceptability of noninvasive brain stimulation interventions for weight reduction in obesity: a pilot network meta-analysis

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Obesity has recently been recognized as a neurocognitive disorder involving circuits associated with the reward system and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been proposed as a strategy for the management of obesity. However, the results have been inconclusive. The aim of the current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of different NIBS modalities for weight reduction in participants with obesity.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining NIBS interventions in patients with obesity were analyzed using the frequentist model of NMA. The coprimary outcome was change in body mass index (BMI) and acceptability, which was calculated using the dropout rate.

Results:

Overall, the current NMA, consisting of eight RCTs, revealed that the high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the left DLPFC was ranked to be associated with the second-largest decrease in BMI and the largest decrease in total energy intake and craving severity, whereas the high-frequency deep TMS over bilateral DLPFC and the insula was ranked to be associated with the largest decrease in BMI.

Conclusion:

This pilot study provided a “signal” for the design of more methodologically robust and larger RCTs based on the findings of the potentially beneficial effect on weight reduction in participants with obesity by different NIBS interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart of the current network meta-analysis.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: The network structure of coprimary outcome: (2A) changes in BMI after individual NIBS intervention and (2B) acceptability, reflected by the dropout rate.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Forest plot of the coprimary outcome: (3A) changes in BMI after individual NIBS intervention and (3B) acceptability with respect to dropout rate.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129:S102–38. 201325 Suppl 2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dragano NRV, Ferno J, Dieguez C, Lopez M, Milbank E. Recent updates on obesity treatments: available drugs and future directions. Neuroscience. 2020;437:215–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Solmi M, Kohler CA, Stubbs B, Koyanagi A, Bortolato B, Monaco F, et al. Environmental risk factors and nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions for obesity: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Eur j of clin invest. 2018;48:e12982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forcano L, Castellano M, Cuenca-Royo A, Goday-Arno A, Pastor A, Langohr K, et al. Prefrontal cortex neuromodulation enhances frontal asymmetry and reduces caloric intake in patients with morbid. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28:696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alonso-Alonso M, Woods SC, Pelchat M, Grigson PS, Stice E, Farooqi S, et al. Food reward system: current perspectives and future research needs. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:296–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahima RS, Antwi DA. Brain regulation of appetite and satiety. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008;37:811–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gluck ME, Viswanath P, Stinson EJ. Obesity, appetite, and the prefrontal cortex. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amo Usanos C, Valenzuela PL, de la Villa P, Navarro SM, Melo Aroeira AE, Amo, et al. Neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex facilitates diet-induced weight loss in midlife women: a randomized, proof-of-concept clinical trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020;44:568–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kringelbach ML, de Araujo IE, Rolls ET. Taste-related activity in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2004;21:781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fassini PG, Das SK, Magerowski G, Marchini JS, da Silva Junior WA, da Silva IR, et al. Noninvasive neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex in young women with obesity: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020;44:1279–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Polania R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:174–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SH, Chung JH, Kim TH, Lim SH, Kim Y, Lee YA, et al. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on eating behaviors and body weight in obesity: A randomized controlled study. Brain stimulation. 2018;11:528–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SH, Park BY, Byeon K, Park H, Kim Y, Eun YM, et al. The effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on resting-state functional connectivity in obese adults. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1956–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gluck ME, Alonso-Alonso M, Piaggi P, Weise CM, Jumpertz-von Schwartzenberg R, Reinhardt M, et al. Neuromodulation targeted to the prefrontal cortex induces changes in energy intake and weight loss in obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23:2149–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrulli A, Macri C, Terruzzi I, Massarini S, Ambrogi F, Adamo M, et al. Weight loss induced by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in obesity: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1849–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J, et al. Canadian network for mood and anxiety treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 4. neurostimulation treatments. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2016;61:561–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation-update 2011. Restor neurol and neurosci. 2011;29:463–92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain stimul. 2008;1:206–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horvath JC, Carter O, Forte JD. Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren’t discussing (but probably should be). Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Forogh B, Yazdi-Bahri SM, Ahadi T, Fereshtehnejad SM, Raissi GR. Comparison of two protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial of burst repetitive versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurol Sci. 2014;35:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le DS, Pannacciulli N, Chen K, Salbe AD, Del Parigi A, Hill JO, et al. Less activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the reanalysis of the response to a meal in obese than in lean women and its association with successful weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:573–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinitz S, Reinhardt M, Piaggi P, Weise CM, Diaz E, Stinson EJ, et al. Neuromodulation directed at the prefrontal cortex of subjects with obesity reduces snack food intake and hunger in a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1347–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe CJ, Vincent C, Hall PA. Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on food cravings and consumption: a meta-analytic review. Psychosom med. 2017;79:2–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins JP, Welton NJ. Network meta-analysis: a norm for comparative effectiveness? Lancet. 2015;386:628–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naci H, Salcher-Konrad M, Kesselheim AS, Wieseler B, Rochaix L, Redberg RF, et al. Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval. Lancet. 2020;395:986–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Song S, Zilverstand A, Gui W, Li HJ, Zhou X. Effects of single-session versus multi-session non-invasive brain stimulation on craving and consumption in individuals with drug addiction, eating disorders or obesity: a meta-analysis. Brain stimul. 2019;12:606–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalton B, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. Neuromodulation and neurofeedback treatments in eating disorders and obesity. Curr opin in psychiatry. 2017;30:458–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Val-Laillet D, Aarts E, Weber B, Ferrari M, Quaresima V, Stoeckel LE, et al. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:1–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogbonnaya S, Kaliaperumal C. Vagal nerve stimulator: Evolving trends. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Misra A. Ethnic-Specific Criteria for Classification of Body Mass Index: A Perspective for Asian Indians and American Diabetes Association Position Statement. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:667–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hsieh MT, Tseng PT, Wu YC, Tu YK, Wu HC, Hsu CW, et al. Effects of different pharmacologic smoking cessation treatments on body weight changes and success rates in patients with nicotine dependence: a network meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:895–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu YC, Tseng PT, Tu YK, Hsu CY, Liang CS, Yeh TC. et al. Association of delirium response and safety of pharmacological interventions for the management and prevention of delirium: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:526–535. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeng BS, Lin SY, Tu YK, Wu YC, Stubbs B, Liang CS, et al. Prevention of postdental procedure bacteremia: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2019;98:1204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang CP, Tseng PT, Pei-Chen Chang J, Su H, Satyanarayanan SK, Su KP. Melatonergic agents in the prevention of delirium: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2020;50:101235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen JJ, Zeng BS, Wu CN, Stubbs B, Carvalho AF, Brunoni AR. et al. Association of central noninvasive brain stimulation interventions with efficacy and safety in tinnitus management: a meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tseng PT, Yang CP, Su KP, Chen TY, Wu YC, Tu YK. et al. The association between melatonin and episodic migraine: a pilot network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the prophylactic effects with exogenous melatonin supplementation and pharmacotherapy. J Pineal Res. 2020;69:e12663. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chu CS, Li CT, Brunoni AR, Yang FC, Tseng PT, Tu YK. et al. Cognitive effects and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a component network meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-323870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009.

  40. Brockhaus AC, Bender R, Skipka G. The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure. Stat Med. 2014;33:4861–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall JK, Iorio A, Thabane L. Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tu YK. Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:911–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 2015;15:951–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Reeves D. A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses. PloS one. 2013;8:e69930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Higgins JP, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Salanti G. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-Analysis. Value Health. 2014;17:A324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mutz J, Vipulananthan V, Carter B, Hurlemann R, Fu CHY, Young AH. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bmj. 2019;364:l1079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. Bmj. 2003;326:219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Garcia-Garcia I, Jurado MA, Garolera M, Marques-Iturria I, Horstmann A, Segura B, et al. Functional network centrality in obesity: a resting-state and task fMRI study. Psychiatry research. 2015;233:331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kullmann S, Pape AA, Heni M, Ketterer C, Schick F, Haring HU, et al. Functional network connectivity underlying food processing: disturbed salience and visual processing in overweight and obese adults. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:1247–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ahn HM, Ham BJ, Kim SH. A combined approach of high-frequency rTMS and food-inhibition association training reduces chocolate snack consumption. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:815.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Muller MB, Toschi N, Kresse AE, Post A, Keck ME. Long-term repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and cholecystokinin mRNA, but not neuropeptide tyrosine mRNA in specific areas of rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;23:205–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Araki S, Yamamoto Y, Dobashi K, Asayama K, Kusuhara K. Decreased plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its relationship with obesity and birth weight in obese Japanese children. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014;8:e63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Le DS, Pannacciulli N, Chen K, Del Parigi A, Salbe AD, Reiman EM, et al. Less activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to a meal: a feature of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:725–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Orsi G, Perlaki G, Kovacs N, Aradi M, Papp Z, Karadi K, et al. Body weight and the reward system: the volume of the right amygdala may be associated with body mass index in young overweight men. Brain imaging and behav. 2011;5:149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sala A, Malpetti M, Ferrulli A, Gianolli L, Luzi L, Perani D, et al. High body mass index, brain metabolism and connectivity: an unfavorable effect in elderly females. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11:8573–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Rolls ET. The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:284–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dinur-Klein L, Dannon P, Hadar A, Rosenberg O, Roth Y, Kotler M, et al. Smoking cessation induced by deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal and insular cortices: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Biol psychiatry. 2014;76:742–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Jastreboff AM, Lacadie C, Seo D, Kubat J, Van Name MA, Giannini C, et al. Leptin is associated with exaggerated brain reward and emotion responses to food images in adolescent obesity. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:3061–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ferrulli A, Macri C, Terruzzi I, Ambrogi F, Milani V, Adamo M, et al. High frequency deep transcranial magnetic stimulation acutely increases beta-endorphins in obese humans. Endocrine. 2019;64:67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fonteneau C, Redoute J, Haesebaert F, Le Bars D, Costes N, Suaud-Chagny MF, et al. Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation induces dopamine release in the ventral striatum in human. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28:2636–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this work were supported by the following grants: Brendon Stubbs is supported by a Clinical Lectureship (ICA-CL-2017-03-001) jointly funded by Health Education England (HEE) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Brendon Stubbs is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Center at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Brendon Stubbs is also supported by the Maudsley Charity, King’s College London, and the NIHR South London Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) funding. This paper presents independent research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the acknowledged institutions. The work of Kuan-Pin Su is supported by the following grants: MOST 106-2314-B-039-027-MY3, 107-2314-B-039-005, 108-2320-B-039-048, and 108-2314-B-039-016 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; and DMR-107-091, DRM-108-091, CRS-108-048, CMU108-SR-106, DMR-108-216, CMRC-CMA-3, DMR-109-102 and the Chinese Medicine Research Center from the China Medical University, Taiwan. The work by Pao-Yen Lin is supported by the following grants: MOST 106-2314-B-182A-085 -MY2 and MOST 105-2314-B-182A-057 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; and CMRPG8F1371, CMRPG8E1061F from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. The work of Yu-Kang Tu was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant no: 106‐2314‐B‐002 ‐098 ‐MY3). Dr Brunoni reports grants from São Paulo Research State Foundation (2012/20911-5, 2017/50223-6, 2018/10861-7), Brazilian National Council of Scientific Development productivity support (PQ-1B), and University of São Paulo Medical School productivity support (PIPA-A), during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Neurocare GMBH outside the submitted work; and Dr. Brunoni is Chief Medical Advisor of Flow Neuroscience (Malmö, Sweden) and has small equity in this company. This role started in June 2019. This manuscript was edited by Elsevier Language Editing Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping-Tao Tseng or Cheng-Ta Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, BY., Zeng, BS., Chen, YW. et al. Efficacy and acceptability of noninvasive brain stimulation interventions for weight reduction in obesity: a pilot network meta-analysis. Int J Obes 45, 1705–1716 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00833-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00833-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links