Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Clinical Research

Computed-tomography-based predictive scores of surgical complications to help decision-making in enrolling obese patients in kidney transplantation list

Abstract

This study aimed at developing scores predicting surgical complications in obese transplant recipients, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) parameters. All consecutive patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent kidney transplantation between 2012 and 2019 were included. The preoperative CT parameters were assessed: total fatty surface (TFS), subcutaneous fatty surface (SFS), iliac vessel to skin distance (VSD), and abdominal perimeter (AP). Per- and postoperative complications (vascular, urinary, parietal, and digestive complications) within 30 days were listed. Predictive models of surgical complications were generated based on the results of the logistic regression. Among the 163 patients included, 53 (32.5%) experienced surgical complications. The AP was a risk factor for complications in multivariate analysis (OR: 1.050; 95% CI: 1.016–1.087; p = 0.03). Two predictive models of complications were created based on the statistical analysis: a one-variable model based on AP (sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 41.8%, area under the curve (AUC) 65.3, with a cutoff value of 107 cm) and a five-variable model based on BMI, TFS, SFS, VSD, and AP (sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 57.3%, AUC 66.2). These models, based on patient morphometric measurements, could allow predicting the occurrence of surgical complications in obese candidates for kidney transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Segmentation performed on a computed tomography slice acquired at the level of the internal/external arterial iliac bifurcation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Knoll G, Bello A, Browne S, Jadhav D, et al. Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes: systematic review of kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2093–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa L, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill CJ, Courtney AE, Cardwell CR, Maxwell AP, Lucarelli G, Veroux M, et al. Recipient obesity and outcomes after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1403–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoogeveen EK, Aalten J, Rothman KJ, Roodnat JI, Mallat M, Borm G. et al. Effect of obesity on the outcome of kidney transplantation: a 20-year follow-up. Transplantation. 2011;91:869–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meier-Kriesche H-U, Arndorfer JA, Kaplan B. The impact of body mass index on renal transplant outcomes: a significant independent risk factor for graft failure and patient death. Transplantation. 2002;73:70–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansen KL. Obesity and body composition for transplant wait-list candidacy—challenging or maintaining the BMI limits? J Ren Nutr. 2013;23:207–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pescatori LC, Savarino E, Mauri G, Silvestri E, Cariati M, Sardanelli F, et al. Quantification of visceral adipose tissue by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: reproducibility and accuracy. Radiol Bras. 2019;52:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicoletto BB, Fonseca NKO, Manfro RC, Gonçalves LFS, Leitão CB, Souza GC, et al. Effects of obesity on kidney transplantation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2014;98:167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Potluri K, Hou S. Obesity in kidney transplant recipients and candidates. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:143–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo JH, Wong MS, Perez RV, Li C-S, Lin T-C, Troppmann C, et al. Renal transplant wound complications in the modern era of obesity. J Surg Res. 2012;173:216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK: data collection, data analysis, and writing; A-FR: data collection; M Schaeffer: statistical analysis; M Sagnard: data collection; SC, MO, and FT: study design; YG: writing; and NC and AL: study design and writing. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salomé Kuntz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuntz, S., Rouby, AF., Schaeffer, M. et al. Computed-tomography-based predictive scores of surgical complications to help decision-making in enrolling obese patients in kidney transplantation list. Int J Obes 45, 2274–2276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00886-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00886-3

Search

Quick links