Table 2 Moderating effects of randomised group and eating behaviour traits on percent weight change at end of intervention.

From: Individual participant data meta-analysis of eating behaviour traits as effect modifiers in acceptance and commitment therapy-based weight management interventions

Exposure

N sample [N studies]

Intervention effect on percentage weight change

Interaction of categorised EBTs and randomised group on percentage weight change

Interaction of continuous EBTs and randomised group on percentage weight change

MD (95% CI)a

Tau2

MD (95% CI)b, c

Tau2

MD (95% CI)b

Tau2

Emotional eating

1893 [13]

0.007 (−0.02, 0.04)

0.00

 Low

809

−0.605 (−1.72, 0.53)

0.05

0.309 (−1.38, 2.06)

0.00

  

 Medium

565

−1.694 (−2.92, −0.65)

1.08

ref

  

 High

519

0.055 (−0.86, 1.48)

1.84

1.191 (−0.38, 3.21)

1.30

  

External eating

1309 [9]

0.041 (−0.004, 0.09)

0.00

 Low

578

−1.271 (−2.81, 0.26)

0.00

−0.418 (−2.71, 1.79)

1.42

  

 Medium

379

−0.899 (−2.72, 0.69)

1.88

ref

  

 High

352

1.213 (−0.4, 3.05)

1.21

1.577 (−0.91, 4.2)

0.00

  

Internal disinhibition

1152 [7]

0.008 (−0.04, 0.06)

0.00

 Low

413

−0.777 (−2.56, 1.13)

0.72

0.648 (−2.07, 3.21)

1.94

  

 Medium

397

−1.459 (−3.09, 0.41)

4.42

ref

  

 High

342

0.506 (−1.23, 2.46)

3.10

1.802 (−1.04, 4.46)

1.31

  

Restraint

1786 [13]

−0.008 (−0.04, 0.03)

0.00

 Low

745

−0.891 (−1.9, 0.12)

0.00

0.456 (−1.11, 2.03)

0.00

  

 Medium

472

−1.398 (−2.68, −0.11)

0.00

ref

  

 High

569

−0.932 (−1.81, 0.23)

0.92

0.373 (−1.27, 2.02)

0.00

  

Uncontrolled eating

1328 [8]

0.004 (−0.03, 0.04)

0.00

 Low

522

−1.423 (−2.63, −0.22)

0.00

−0.587 (−2.36, 1.19)

0.00

  

 Medium

386

−0.55 (−1.94, 0.84)

0.00

ref

  

 High

420

−1.538 (−2.57, 0.06)

1.85

−0.405 (−2.24, 1.49)

0.32

  
  1. Rank deficient coefficients were removed from the model by the lmer function (e.g. if one study only included females and no males).
  2. MD mean difference, CI confidence interval.
  3. aIntervention effects (ACT vs. control) in strata of low, medium, and high levels of EBTs on percentage weight change were estimated while stratifying all other parameters by trial.
  4. bInteractions between randomised group (ACT vs. control) and EBTs on percentage weight change were estimated while stratifying all other parameters by trial.
  5. cReference group was medium levels of each EBT, respectively.