Table 1 Impact of anatomical variations on the stretching potential of the Schneiderian membrane
| Â | Stretch-favorable type (SFT) | Stretching-unfavorable type (SUT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Anatomic variable | Anatomical features | Advice | Anatomical features | Advice |
Sinus health condition | Health sinus | Lower perforation risk96 | Sinus diseases | |
pseudocysts in a small size without clinical symptoms | Not contraindications to surgery55 | |||
Membrane thickness | Appropriate membrane thickness between 1–2 mm | Predictable sinus augmentation procedure65 | Thinner membrane thickness of (0.84 ± 0.67) mm | Higher perforation risk compared with (2.65 ± 4.02) mm group49 |
Thicken due to inflammation | Significant correlation between preoperative sinus lesions and perforation51 | |||
Sinus width and contours | Tapering or ovoid | Both lateral and transcrestal approaches are recommended33,87 | V-shape, | Obscured visibility and limitd access to the antral space22,24 |
Irregular | Higher perforation risk87 | |||
Square | Lateral approach with a wider window33 | |||
Septa | Absence of septa | Lower perforation risk86 | One or multiple septa | |