Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Background

Climate mitigation policies that focus on the transportation sector yield near-term health co-benefits that could motivate policy action.

Objective

We quantified CO2 emission reductions as well as the air pollution and health benefits of urban transportation policies promoting electric vehicles (EV) and walking and bicycling in Seattle, Washington.

Methods

We compared a business-as-usual scenario projected to 2035 with intervention scenarios in which 35% of gasoline vehicles were switched to EV, and 50% of car trips less than 8 kilometers were replaced by walking or bicycling. We modeled changes in primary traffic-generated oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as well as walking and bicycling activity, CO2 emissions from traffic, and fatal traffic injuries due to the transportation policy scenarios. We estimated the impacts of these changes on annual cases of asthma and premature mortality in the Seattle population.

Results

Increasing the use of EV, walking, and bicycling is estimated to reduce CO2 emissions by 744 tons/year (30%) and lower annual average concentrations of primary traffic-generated NOx and PM2.5 by 0.32 ppb (13%) and 0.08 μg/m3 (19%), respectively. In Seattle, the lower air pollutant concentrations, greater active transportation, and lower fatal traffic injuries would prevent 13 (95% CI: −1, 28), 49 (95% CI: 19, 71), and 5 (95% CI: 0, 14) premature deaths per year, respectively and 20 (95% CI: 8, 27) cases of asthma per year.

Significance

Moving towards cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO2 emissions, improve air quality, and population health. The resulting public health benefits provide important motivation for urban climate action plans.

Impact statement

Using key components of the health impact assessment framework, we quantify the environmental and health benefits of urban transportation policy scenarios that promote electric vehicle use and replace short car trips with walking and bicycling as compared with a business as usual scenario in 2035. Our findings demonstrate that transportation scenarios promoting cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO2 emissions, improve air quality, and increase physical activity levels, resulting in significant public health benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Wright L, Fulton L. Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transp Rev. 2005;25:691–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int [Internet]. 2011;37:766–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The World Bank, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Transport for Health:The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport. Seattle, WA: IHME; Washington, DC: The Word Bank, 2014; 2014.

  4. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Statistics. Table 1-41 [Internet]. Washington, DC; 2016. Available from: www.bts.gov

  5. Carlson S, Densmore D, Fulton JE, Yore MM, Kohl HW. Differences in physical activity prevalence and trends from 3 U.S. surveillance systems: NHIS, NHANES, and BRFSS. J Phys Act Health [Internet]. 2009;6:S18–27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19998846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet [Internet]. 2012;380:219–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pucher J, Dijkstra L. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabow ML, Spack SN, Sledge JS, Holloway TA, Stone B, Mednick AC, et al. Air quality and health benefits from reduced car travel in the Midwestern United States. Environ Health Perspect [Internet]. 2012;68:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103440. Available from[Online 2 November 2011]

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maizlish N, Woodcock J, Co S, Ostro B, Fanai A, Fairley D. Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:703–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet [Internet]. 2009;374:1930–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keuken MP, Jonkers S, Verhagen HLM, Perez L, Trüeb S, Okkerse WJ, et al. Impact on air quality of measures to reduce CO2 emissions from road traffic in Basel, Rotterdam, Xi’an and Suzhou. Atmos Environ. 2014;98:434–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez L, Trüeb S, Cowie H, Keuken MP, Mudu P, Ragettli MS, et al. Transport-related measures to mitigate climate change in Basel, Switzerland: A health-effectiveness comparison study. Environ Int [Internet]. 2015;85:111–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.08.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xia T, Nitschke M, Zhang Y, Shah P, Crabb S, Hansen A. Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia. Environ Int [Internet]. 2015;74:281–90. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412014002980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology and C on HIA. Improving Health in the United States: The Role of Health Impact Assessment Committee on Health Impact Assessment. National Research Council [Internet]. The National Academy Press, editor. Washington, DC; 2011. 1–209 p. Available from: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity.Files/Environment/EnvironmentalHealthRT/2011-Nov-RT/132291.pdf

  15. Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: A health impact assessment study. Environ Int [Internet]. 2012;49:100–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E, Gerike R, et al. Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Prev Med (Balt) [Internet]. 2015;76:103–14. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743515001164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WTP 2035 Steering Committee. Washington Transportation Plan. Connecting Washington Communities for Healthy and Prosperous Future [Internet]. Seattle, WA; 2015. http://wstc.wa.gov/wtp/

  18. Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment. 2017 Drive Clean Seattle. Implementation Strategy [Internet]. 2017. https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Environment/ClimateChange/Drive_Clean_Seattle_2017_Report.pdf

  19. Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S. Comparative quantification of health risks: Conceptual framework and methodological issues. Popul Health Metr. 2003;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Washington State Department of Transportation. Modifications to the Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Statewide Forecast Model [Internet]. 2014. http://www.ofm.wa.gov/budget/info/Sept14VMT_forecast_changes.pdf

  21. US. EPA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Joint Technical Support Document: Final Rulemaking for 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. EPA-420-R-12-901. 2012.

  22. Filigrana P, Milando C, Batterman S, Levy J, Mukherjee B, Adar S. Spatiotemporal variations in traffic activity and their influence on air pollution levels in communities near highways. Atmos Environ [Internet]. 2020;242:117758 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Council PSR. Puget Sound Regional Travel Survey Report: 2015 Household Travel Survey [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.psrc.org/travel-surveys-spring-2014-household-survey

  24. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N,JRDRB, Tudor-locke C, et al. Second Update of Codes and MET Values. Am Coll Sport Med. 2011;43:1575–81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kahlmeier S, Cavil N, Dinsdale H, Rutter H, Gotschi T, Kelly P, et al. Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling. Economic Assessment of Transport Infrastructure and Policies. 1st ed. World Health Organization, editor. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011. 1–39 p.

  26. Zhou J, Ito K, Lall R, Lippmann M, Thurston G. Time-Ser Anal Mortal Eff Fine Particulate Matter Compon Detroit Seattle. 2011;119:461–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pope CA, Turner MC, Burnett RT, Jerrett M, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, et al. Relationships between fine particulate air pollution, cardiometabolic disorders, and cardiovascular mortality. Circ Res. 2015;116:108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Health Effect Institute (HEI). Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of particulate air pollution and mortality. Health Effects Institute, Special Report. [Internet]. A Special Report of the Institute’s Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis. Boston, MA; 2000. Available from: http://pubs.healtheffects.org/getfile.php?u=478

  29. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Beckerman BS, Turner MC, Krewski D, Thurston G, et al. Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:593–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen – Health Criteria (2016 Final Report) [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/isa/integrated-science-assessment-isa-nitrogen-dioxide-health-criteria

  31. Macintyre EA, Brauer M, Melén E, Bauer CP, Bauer M, Berdel D, et al. GSTP1 and TNF Gene Variants and Associations between Air Pollution and Incident Childhood Asthma: The Traffic, Asthma and Genetics (TAG) Study. Env Heal Perspect. 2014;122:418–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Samoli E, Analitis A, Touloumi G, Schwartz J, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, et al. Estimating the exposure-response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:88–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwartz J, Laden F, Zanobetti A. The concentration-response relation between PM2.5 and daily deaths. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:1025–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Woodcock J, Franco OH, Orsini N, Roberts I. Non-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:121–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hamer M, Chida Y. Walking and primary prevention: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:238–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Woodcock J, Givoni M, Morgan AS Health Impact Modelling of Active Travel Visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM). PLoS One. 2013;8.

  37. Elvik R, Bjørnskau T. Safety-in-numbers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2017;92:274–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. US. EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter [Internet]. 2018. Available from: www.epa.gov/isa

  39. Jacobsen PL, Racioppi F, Rutter H. Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. Inj Prev. 2009;15:369–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Royal D, Miller-Steige D National Survey of Bicyclist and Pedestrian Attitudes and Behavior. Volume II Findings Report. Final Report. Vol. II. Washington; 2008.

  41. Nazemi M, Van Eggermond M, Erath A, Schaffner D, Joos M, Axhausen KW. Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accid Anal Prev [Internet]. 2021;151:105943 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Seattle Department of Transportation. Seattle bicycle master plan 2017-2021. Implementation Plan [Internet]. 20017. Available from: https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/SDOT/About/DocumentLibrary/BicycleMasterPlan/BMP_Imp_Plan_2017_vr32.pdf

  43. Nealer R, Reichmuth D, Anair D Cleaner Cars from Cradle to Grave. How Electric Cars Beat Gasoline Cars on Lifetime Global Warming Emissions. Union of Concerned Scientist. [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/11/Cleaner-Cars-from-Cradle-to-Grave-exec-summary.pdf

  44. Thind MPS, Wilson EJ, Azevedo IL, Marshall JD. Marginal Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation in the Midcontinent ISO. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:14445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Foley L, Panter J, Heinen E, Prins R, Ogilvie D. Changes in active commuting and changes in physical activity in adults: A cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act [Internet]. 2015;12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0323-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wanner M, Götschi T, Martin-Diener E, Kahlmeier S, Martin BW. Active transport, physical activity, and body weight in adults a systematic review. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2012;42:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.030. Available from

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Filigrana P, Milando C, Batterman S, Levy JI, Mukherjee B, Pedde M, et al. Exposures to Primary Air Pollutants Generated by Highway Traffic and the Risk of Daily Mortality in Near Road Communities: A Case-Crossover Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab215.

  48. Tainio M, de Nazelle AJ, Götschi T, Kahlmeier S, Rojas-Rueda D, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Prev Med (Balt) [Internet]. 2015;87:233–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. U.S EPA. Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards; Final Rule. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 81. Epa Usa [Internet]. 2014;79:23414–886. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-04-28/pdf/2014-06954.pdf

  50. U.S EPA. EPA and NHTSA Set Standards to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve Fuel Economy for Model Years 2017-2025 Cars and Light Trucks. Regul Announc. 2012;2012:1–10

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge: Washington State Agencies such as the Washington State Department of Transportation for providing information on traffic injuries and the information to generate inputs for MOVES. The Air Quality Program of the Washington State Department of Ecology for providing information to generate inputs for MOVES. Phil Swartzendruber at the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for providing AERMET outputs of meteorological conditions in the region. Alex Cao, consultant at the Consultant for Statistics, Computing and Analytics Research of the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School for providing assistance and support to processing big datasets. We also thank the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-COLCIENCIAS of Colombia and the Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan, USA for funding this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-COLCIENCIAS of Colombia and the Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan, US.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors specific contributions to this work are as follows: PF made substantial contributions to conceive and design the study, acquisition of data, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the article, including the version to be published. JL contributed to the design and implementation of the study and the health impact assessment approach, made important contributions to analyze and interpret the data, critically revised the draft for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published. JG contributed to the acquisition of data, structured analytical datasets, reviewed several drafts and gave approval of the version to be submitted; SB made substantial contributions to the study design, especially the air quality modeling approach, critically revised the draft for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be submitted. SA made substantial contributions to conceive and design the study, provided intellectual insights to analyze and interpret data, acquisition of data, revised draft for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Filigrana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Given the nature of the data and information used in this study, ethics approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filigrana, P., Levy, J.I., Gauthier, J. et al. Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 32, 538–544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00423-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00423-y

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links