Abstract
Background
Climate mitigation policies that focus on the transportation sector yield near-term health co-benefits that could motivate policy action.
Objective
We quantified CO2 emission reductions as well as the air pollution and health benefits of urban transportation policies promoting electric vehicles (EV) and walking and bicycling in Seattle, Washington.
Methods
We compared a business-as-usual scenario projected to 2035 with intervention scenarios in which 35% of gasoline vehicles were switched to EV, and 50% of car trips less than 8 kilometers were replaced by walking or bicycling. We modeled changes in primary traffic-generated oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as well as walking and bicycling activity, CO2 emissions from traffic, and fatal traffic injuries due to the transportation policy scenarios. We estimated the impacts of these changes on annual cases of asthma and premature mortality in the Seattle population.
Results
Increasing the use of EV, walking, and bicycling is estimated to reduce CO2 emissions by 744 tons/year (30%) and lower annual average concentrations of primary traffic-generated NOx and PM2.5 by 0.32 ppb (13%) and 0.08 μg/m3 (19%), respectively. In Seattle, the lower air pollutant concentrations, greater active transportation, and lower fatal traffic injuries would prevent 13 (95% CI: −1, 28), 49 (95% CI: 19, 71), and 5 (95% CI: 0, 14) premature deaths per year, respectively and 20 (95% CI: 8, 27) cases of asthma per year.
Significance
Moving towards cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO2 emissions, improve air quality, and population health. The resulting public health benefits provide important motivation for urban climate action plans.
Impact statement
Using key components of the health impact assessment framework, we quantify the environmental and health benefits of urban transportation policy scenarios that promote electric vehicle use and replace short car trips with walking and bicycling as compared with a business as usual scenario in 2035. Our findings demonstrate that transportation scenarios promoting cleaner vehicles and active transportation can reduce CO2 emissions, improve air quality, and increase physical activity levels, resulting in significant public health benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Wright L, Fulton L. Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transp Rev. 2005;25:691–717.
De Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int [Internet]. 2011;37:766–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003.
The World Bank, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Transport for Health:The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport. Seattle, WA: IHME; Washington, DC: The Word Bank, 2014; 2014.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Statistics. Table 1-41 [Internet]. Washington, DC; 2016. Available from: www.bts.gov
Carlson S, Densmore D, Fulton JE, Yore MM, Kohl HW. Differences in physical activity prevalence and trends from 3 U.S. surveillance systems: NHIS, NHANES, and BRFSS. J Phys Act Health [Internet]. 2009;6:S18–27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19998846.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet [Internet]. 2012;380:219–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.
Pucher J, Dijkstra L. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–16.
Grabow ML, Spack SN, Sledge JS, Holloway TA, Stone B, Mednick AC, et al. Air quality and health benefits from reduced car travel in the Midwestern United States. Environ Health Perspect [Internet]. 2012;68:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103440. Available from[Online 2 November 2011]
Maizlish N, Woodcock J, Co S, Ostro B, Fanai A, Fairley D. Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:703–9.
Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet [Internet]. 2009;374:1930–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1.
Keuken MP, Jonkers S, Verhagen HLM, Perez L, Trüeb S, Okkerse WJ, et al. Impact on air quality of measures to reduce CO2 emissions from road traffic in Basel, Rotterdam, Xi’an and Suzhou. Atmos Environ. 2014;98:434–41.
Perez L, Trüeb S, Cowie H, Keuken MP, Mudu P, Ragettli MS, et al. Transport-related measures to mitigate climate change in Basel, Switzerland: A health-effectiveness comparison study. Environ Int [Internet]. 2015;85:111–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.08.002.
Xia T, Nitschke M, Zhang Y, Shah P, Crabb S, Hansen A. Traffic-related air pollution and health co-benefits of alternative transport in Adelaide, South Australia. Environ Int [Internet]. 2015;74:281–90. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412014002980.
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology and C on HIA. Improving Health in the United States: The Role of Health Impact Assessment Committee on Health Impact Assessment. National Research Council [Internet]. The National Academy Press, editor. Washington, DC; 2011. 1–209 p. Available from: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity.Files/Environment/EnvironmentalHealthRT/2011-Nov-RT/132291.pdf
Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: A health impact assessment study. Environ Int [Internet]. 2012;49:100–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.009.
Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Cole-Hunter T, de Nazelle A, Dons E, Gerike R, et al. Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Prev Med (Balt) [Internet]. 2015;76:103–14. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743515001164.
WTP 2035 Steering Committee. Washington Transportation Plan. Connecting Washington Communities for Healthy and Prosperous Future [Internet]. Seattle, WA; 2015. http://wstc.wa.gov/wtp/
Seattle Office of Sustainability & Environment. 2017 Drive Clean Seattle. Implementation Strategy [Internet]. 2017. https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Environment/ClimateChange/Drive_Clean_Seattle_2017_Report.pdf
Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S. Comparative quantification of health risks: Conceptual framework and methodological issues. Popul Health Metr. 2003;1:1.
Washington State Department of Transportation. Modifications to the Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Statewide Forecast Model [Internet]. 2014. http://www.ofm.wa.gov/budget/info/Sept14VMT_forecast_changes.pdf
US. EPA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Joint Technical Support Document: Final Rulemaking for 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. EPA-420-R-12-901. 2012.
Filigrana P, Milando C, Batterman S, Levy J, Mukherjee B, Adar S. Spatiotemporal variations in traffic activity and their influence on air pollution levels in communities near highways. Atmos Environ [Internet]. 2020;242:117758 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117758.
Council PSR. Puget Sound Regional Travel Survey Report: 2015 Household Travel Survey [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.psrc.org/travel-surveys-spring-2014-household-survey
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N,JRDRB, Tudor-locke C, et al. Second Update of Codes and MET Values. Am Coll Sport Med. 2011;43:1575–81.
Kahlmeier S, Cavil N, Dinsdale H, Rutter H, Gotschi T, Kelly P, et al. Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling. Economic Assessment of Transport Infrastructure and Policies. 1st ed. World Health Organization, editor. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011. 1–39 p.
Zhou J, Ito K, Lall R, Lippmann M, Thurston G. Time-Ser Anal Mortal Eff Fine Particulate Matter Compon Detroit Seattle. 2011;119:461–6.
Pope CA, Turner MC, Burnett RT, Jerrett M, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, et al. Relationships between fine particulate air pollution, cardiometabolic disorders, and cardiovascular mortality. Circ Res. 2015;116:108–15.
Health Effect Institute (HEI). Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of particulate air pollution and mortality. Health Effects Institute, Special Report. [Internet]. A Special Report of the Institute’s Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis. Boston, MA; 2000. Available from: http://pubs.healtheffects.org/getfile.php?u=478
Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Beckerman BS, Turner MC, Krewski D, Thurston G, et al. Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in California. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:593–9.
U.S EPA. Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen – Health Criteria (2016 Final Report) [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/isa/integrated-science-assessment-isa-nitrogen-dioxide-health-criteria
Macintyre EA, Brauer M, Melén E, Bauer CP, Bauer M, Berdel D, et al. GSTP1 and TNF Gene Variants and Associations between Air Pollution and Incident Childhood Asthma: The Traffic, Asthma and Genetics (TAG) Study. Env Heal Perspect. 2014;122:418–24.
Samoli E, Analitis A, Touloumi G, Schwartz J, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, et al. Estimating the exposure-response relationships between particulate matter and mortality within the APHEA multicity project. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:88–95.
Schwartz J, Laden F, Zanobetti A. The concentration-response relation between PM2.5 and daily deaths. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:1025–9.
Woodcock J, Franco OH, Orsini N, Roberts I. Non-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:121–38.
Hamer M, Chida Y. Walking and primary prevention: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:238–43.
Woodcock J, Givoni M, Morgan AS Health Impact Modelling of Active Travel Visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM). PLoS One. 2013;8.
Elvik R, Bjørnskau T. Safety-in-numbers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2017;92:274–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.017.
US. EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter [Internet]. 2018. Available from: www.epa.gov/isa
Jacobsen PL, Racioppi F, Rutter H. Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. Inj Prev. 2009;15:369–73.
Royal D, Miller-Steige D National Survey of Bicyclist and Pedestrian Attitudes and Behavior. Volume II Findings Report. Final Report. Vol. II. Washington; 2008.
Nazemi M, Van Eggermond M, Erath A, Schaffner D, Joos M, Axhausen KW. Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accid Anal Prev [Internet]. 2021;151:105943 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943.
Seattle Department of Transportation. Seattle bicycle master plan 2017-2021. Implementation Plan [Internet]. 20017. Available from: https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/SDOT/About/DocumentLibrary/BicycleMasterPlan/BMP_Imp_Plan_2017_vr32.pdf
Nealer R, Reichmuth D, Anair D Cleaner Cars from Cradle to Grave. How Electric Cars Beat Gasoline Cars on Lifetime Global Warming Emissions. Union of Concerned Scientist. [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/11/Cleaner-Cars-from-Cradle-to-Grave-exec-summary.pdf
Thind MPS, Wilson EJ, Azevedo IL, Marshall JD. Marginal Emissions Factors for Electricity Generation in the Midcontinent ISO. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:14445–52.
Foley L, Panter J, Heinen E, Prins R, Ogilvie D. Changes in active commuting and changes in physical activity in adults: A cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act [Internet]. 2015;12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0323-0.
Wanner M, Götschi T, Martin-Diener E, Kahlmeier S, Martin BW. Active transport, physical activity, and body weight in adults a systematic review. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2012;42:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.030. Available from
Filigrana P, Milando C, Batterman S, Levy JI, Mukherjee B, Pedde M, et al. Exposures to Primary Air Pollutants Generated by Highway Traffic and the Risk of Daily Mortality in Near Road Communities: A Case-Crossover Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab215.
Tainio M, de Nazelle AJ, Götschi T, Kahlmeier S, Rojas-Rueda D, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Prev Med (Balt) [Internet]. 2015;87:233–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002.
U.S EPA. Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards; Final Rule. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 81. Epa Usa [Internet]. 2014;79:23414–886. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-04-28/pdf/2014-06954.pdf
U.S EPA. EPA and NHTSA Set Standards to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve Fuel Economy for Model Years 2017-2025 Cars and Light Trucks. Regul Announc. 2012;2012:1–10
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge: Washington State Agencies such as the Washington State Department of Transportation for providing information on traffic injuries and the information to generate inputs for MOVES. The Air Quality Program of the Washington State Department of Ecology for providing information to generate inputs for MOVES. Phil Swartzendruber at the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for providing AERMET outputs of meteorological conditions in the region. Alex Cao, consultant at the Consultant for Statistics, Computing and Analytics Research of the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School for providing assistance and support to processing big datasets. We also thank the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-COLCIENCIAS of Colombia and the Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan, USA for funding this study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-COLCIENCIAS of Colombia and the Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan, US.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors specific contributions to this work are as follows: PF made substantial contributions to conceive and design the study, acquisition of data, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the article, including the version to be published. JL contributed to the design and implementation of the study and the health impact assessment approach, made important contributions to analyze and interpret the data, critically revised the draft for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be published. JG contributed to the acquisition of data, structured analytical datasets, reviewed several drafts and gave approval of the version to be submitted; SB made substantial contributions to the study design, especially the air quality modeling approach, critically revised the draft for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be submitted. SA made substantial contributions to conceive and design the study, provided intellectual insights to analyze and interpret data, acquisition of data, revised draft for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Given the nature of the data and information used in this study, ethics approval was not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filigrana, P., Levy, J.I., Gauthier, J. et al. Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 32, 538–544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00423-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00423-y
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Has research on health co-benefits influenced urban climate and transport planning in the United Kingdom, United States, Japan, and France?
Sustainability Science (2025)
-
Alteration in nitrogen cycle and its contribution to climate change: a review
Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy (2025)
-
Fragmented EU Car Labels: How To Achieve Consumer-Friendly Standardization and Transparency?
Journal of Consumer Policy (2025)
-
3 Months without the car in Bielefeld, Germany– a mixed-method study exploring individual motivation to participate in a municipal intervention
BMC Public Health (2024)


