Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide exposures during preconception and pregnancy and associations with Apgar scores in the Az-PEAR study (2006–2020)

Abstract

Background

Pesticide exposures disrupt biological functions in humans, raising concerns about potential effects on newborn health and development.

Objective

To analyze associations of preconception and prenatal exposures to carbamate, organophosphate, and pyrethroid pesticide classes and 25 individual active ingredients with newborn Apgar scores to evaluate the relationship between these exposures and neonatal health.

Methods

We used pesticide use registry and birth certificate data from 2006 to 2020, linked as part of the Arizona Pregnant Women’s Environmental and Reproductive Outcomes Study (Az-PEARS). Exposures were measured as binary variables and defined as living within 500 m of an agricultural pesticide application during preconception (T0, 90 days before conception) and each trimester (T1–T3). Five-minute Apgar scores (low: <8, high: ≥8) were analyzed using log-binomial regression and a meta-analytic approach to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for newborn and maternal demographics.

Results

Approximately half of the newborns were male, and the majority were born at ≥38 weeks of gestation. Mothers were predominantly 20–35 years old and non-Hispanic white. Exposure to several pesticide active ingredients at any point during preconception and/or pregnancy were associated with increased odds of low Apgar scores (aOR [95% CI]): the carbamates carbaryl (2.07 [1.45, 2.96]) and formetanate hydrochloride (3.50 [1.55, 7.89]); the organophosphates diazinon (1.67 [1.25, 2.22]) and tribufos (1.39 [1.02, 1.90]); and the pyrethroid cypermethrin (1.49 [1.03, 2.15]). Consistent effect estimates were seen across trimesters. Additional positive associations included ethephon, phorate, and beta-cyfluthrin during T0, methomyl during T1, and esfenvalerate and fenpropathrin during T2.

Significance

Prenatal exposure to certain carbamates, organophosphates, and pyrethroids had increased odds of low Apgar scores. We identified the preconception period as a possible sensitive exposure window for additional ingredients. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at mitigating maternal agricultural pesticide exposures may improve newborn health.

Impact

Few studies have investigated how ambient preconception and prenatal exposures to pesticide active ingredients affect neonatal health, despite the importance of studying sensitive windows of exposure. Using pesticide use registry and birth certificate data from the state of Arizona, we report that residential proximity to agricultural pesticide exposures of several pesticide active ingredients belonging to the carbamate, organophosphate, and pyrethroid classes during the preconception period and throughout pregnancy is associated with low Apgar scores. This research suggests that maternal pesticide exposures may adversely impact newborn health and emphasizes the importance of mitigating these exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flow diagram of complete case analysis in the Az-PEARS, 2006–2020 (N = 1,141,608).
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Nagy K, Duca RC, Lovas S, Creta M, Scheepers PTJ, Godderis L, et al. Systematic review of comparative studies assessing the toxicity of pesticide active ingredients and their product formulations. Environ Res. 2020;181:108926.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mnif W, Hassine AIH, Bouaziz A, Bartegi A, Thomas O, Roig B. Effect of endocrine disruptor pesticides: a review. IJERPH. 2011;8:2265–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Richardson JR, Fitsanakis V, Westerink RHS, Kanthasamy AG. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:343–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cestonaro LV, Macedo SMD, Piton YV, Garcia SC, Arbo MD. Toxic effects of pesticides on cellular and humoral immunity: an overview. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2022;44:816–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavalier H, Trasande L, Porta M. Exposures to pesticides and risk of cancer: evaluation of recent epidemiological evidence in humans and paths forward. Int J Cancer. 2023;152:879–912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel Rasoul GM, Abou Salem ME, Mechael AA, Hendy OM, Rohlman DS, Ismail AA. Effects of occupational pesticide exposure on children applying pesticides. NeuroToxicology. 2008;29:833–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts JR, Karr CJ, Paulson JA, Brock-Utne AC, Brumberg HL, Campbell CC, et al. Pesticide exposure in children. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1765–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon LV, Shah M, Bragg BN. APGAR score. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470569/

  9. Forsblad K, Källén K, Maršál K, Hellström-Westas L. Apgar score predicts short-term outcome in infants born at 25 gestational weeks. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li F, Wu T, Lei X, Zhang H, Mao M, Zhang J. The Apgar score and infant mortality. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinberger B, Anwar M, Hegyi T, Hiatt M, Koons A, Paneth N. Antecedents and neonatal consequences of low Apgar Scores in preterm newborns: a population study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The Apgar score. 2025. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2015/10/the-apgar-score

  13. Eun S, Lee JM, Yi DY, Lee NM, Kim H, Yun SW, et al. Assessment of the association between Apgar scores and seizures in infants less than 1 year old. Seizure Eur J Epilepsy. 2016;37:48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Razaz N, Cnattingius S, Joseph K. Association between Apgar scores of 7 to 9 and neonatal mortality and morbidity: population based cohort study of term infants in Sweden. BMJ. 2019;365:l1656.

  15. Chong DSY, Karlberg J. Refining the Apgar score cut-off point for newborns at risk. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93:53–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lassi ZS, Imam AM, Dean SV, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: caffeine, smoking, alcohol, drugs and other environmental chemical/radiation exposure. Reprod Health. 2014;11:S6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Louis GMB, Cooney MA, Lynch CD, Handal A. Periconception window: advising the pregnancy-planning couple. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:e119–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Llop S, Murcia M, Iñiguez C, Roca M, González L, Yusà V, et al. Distributions and determinants of urinary biomarkers of organophosphate pesticide exposure in a prospective Spanish birth cohort study. Environ Health. 2017;16:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang A, Wan Y, Qi W, Mahai G, Qian X, Zheng T, et al. Urinary biomarkers of exposure to organophosphate, pyrethroid, neonicotinoid insecticides and oxidative stress: a repeated measurement analysis among pregnant women. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dalmolin SP, Dreon DB, Thiesen FV, Dallegrave E. Biomarkers of occupational exposure to pesticides: systematic review of insecticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;75:103304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sobus JR, Morgan MK, Pleil JD, Barr DB. Chapter 45 - Biomonitoring: uses and considerations for assessing nonoccupational human exposure to pesticides. In: Krieger R, editor. Hayes’ Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2010, p. 1021–36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123743671000458

  22. Furlong MA, Paul KC, Parra KL, Fournier AJ, Ellsworth PC, Cockburn MG, et al. Preconception and first trimester exposure to pesticides and associations with stillbirth. Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194:44–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. USDA. CropScape - Cropland Data Layer. U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2015, https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/CropScape_-_Cropland_Data_Layer/24660315/1

  24. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management. Mineral & Land Records System. 2025. About the Public Land Survey System. https://mlrs.blm.gov/s/article/PLSS-Information

  25. Ritz B, Rull RP. Assessment of environmental exposures from agricultural pesticides in childhood leukaemia studies: challenges and opportunities. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;132:148–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parra KL, Harris RB, Farland LV, Beamer P, Furlong M. Associations of prenatal agricultural farm work with fetal overgrowth and pregnancy complications in state of Arizona birth records. J Occup Environ Med. 2023;65:635–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Parra KL, Farland LV, Harris RB, Toro M, Furlong M. Neighbourhood deprivation and gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Arizona from the AzPEARS study. Paediatric Perinatal Epid. 2025;39:336–45.

  28. Razaz N, Cnattingius S, Persson M, Tedroff K, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. One-minute and five-minute Apgar scores and child developmental health at 5 years of age: a population-based cohort study in British Columbia, Canada. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology. 2010;21:383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T. Negative control exposures in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2012;23:351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flanders WD, Klein M, Darrow LA, Strickland MJ, Sarnat SE, Sarnat JA, et al. A method to detect residual confounding in spatial and other observational studies. Epidemiology. 2011;22:823–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Flanders WD, Strickland MJ, Klein M. A new method for partial correction of residual confounding in time-series and other observational studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185:941–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weisskopf MG, Webster TF. Trade-offs of personal versus more proxy exposure measures in environmental epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2017;28:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Catlin EA, Carpenter MW, Brann BS, Mayfield SR, Shaul PW, Goldstein M, et al. The Apgar score revisited: Influence of gestational age. J Pediatr. 1986;109:865–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: R Studio, PBC; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/

  37. Roberts EM, English PB, Grether JK, Windham GC, Somberg L, Wolff C. Maternal residence near agricultural pesticide applications and autism spectrum disorders among children in the California Central Valley. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1482–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shelton JF, Geraghty EM, Tancredi DJ, Delwiche LD, Schmidt RJ, Ritz B, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bretveld RW, Thomas CM, Scheepers PT, Zielhuis GA, Roeleveld N. Pesticide exposure: the hormonal function of the female reproductive system disrupted? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gilbert ME, Rovet J, Chen Z, Koibuchi N. Developmental thyroid hormone disruption: prevalence, environmental contaminants and neurodevelopmental consequences. NeuroToxicology. 2012;33:842–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Miranda A, Sousa N. Maternal hormonal milieu influence on fetal brain development. Brain Behav. 2018;8:e00920.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Razaz N, Boyce WT, Brownell M, Jutte D, Tremlett H, Marrie RA, et al. Five-minute Apgar score as a marker for developmental vulnerability at 5 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101:F114–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nuseir KQ, Tahaineh L, Al-Mehaisen LM, Al-Kuran O, Ayoub NM, Mukattash TL, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure prenatally influence on pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:4841–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Suwannakul B, Sapbamrer R, Wiwattanadittakul N, Hongsibsong S. Prenatal organophosphate exposure can cause adverse birth outcomes to humans. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:45064–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chambers JE, Dail MB, Meek EC. Oxime-mediated reactivation of organophosphate-inhibited acetylcholinesterase with emphasis on centrally-active oximes. Neuropharmacology. 2020;175:108201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lenina OA, Zueva IV, Zobov VV, Semenov VE, Masson P, Petrov KA. Slow-binding reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase with long-lasting action for prophylaxis of organophosphate poisoning. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Trang A, Khandhar PB. Physiology, Acetylcholinesterase. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539735/

  48. El-Dabah FH, El-Khaleegy HA, Radi IR. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neonatal outcome. EJFSAT. 2013;13:131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hassen TA, Chojenta C, Egan N, Loxton D. The association between the five-minute Apgar score and neurodevelopmental outcomes among children aged 8−66 months in Australia. IJERPH. 2021;18:6450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Persson M, Razaz N, Tedroff K, Joseph KS, Cnattingius S. Five and 10 min Apgar scores and risks of cerebral palsy and epilepsy: population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ. 2018;360:k207.

  51. Yisma E, Mol BW, Lynch JW, Mittinty MN, Smithers LG. Associations between Apgar scores and children’s educational outcomes at eight years of age. Aust NZ J Obst Gynaeco. 2021;61:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. An S, Rauch SA, Maphula A, Obida M, Kogut K, Bornman R, et al. In-utero exposure to DDT and pyrethroids and child behavioral and emotional problems at 2 years of age in the VHEMBE cohort, South Africa. Chemosphere. 2022;306:135569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Furlong MA, Barr DB, Wolff MS, Engel SM. Prenatal exposure to pyrethroid pesticides and childhood behavior and executive functioning. NeuroToxicology. 2017;62:231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Furlong MA, Paul KC, Cockburn M, Bronstein J, Keener A, Rosario ID, et al. Ambient pyrethroid pesticide exposures in adult life and depression in older residents of California’s Central Valley. Environ Epidemiol. 2020;4:e123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Qi Z, Song X, Xiao X, Loo KK, Wang MC, Xu Q, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to pyrethroid pesticides on neurodevelopment of 1-year- old children: a birth cohort study in China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;234:113384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Von Ehrenstein OS, Ling C, Cui X, Cockburn M, Park AS, Yu F, et al. Prenatal and infant exposure to ambient pesticides and autism spectrum disorder in children: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2019;364:l962.

  57. Gunier RB, Bradman A, Harley KG, Kogut K, Eskenazi B. Prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and IQ in 7-year-old children. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125:057002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Engel SM, Bradman A, Wolff MS, Rauh VA, Harley KG, Yang JH, et al. Prenatal organophosphorus pesticide exposure and child neurodevelopment at 24 months: an analysis of four birth cohorts. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:822–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Eskenazi B, Kogut K, Huen K, Harley KG, Bouchard M, Bradman A, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure, PON1, and neurodevelopment in school-age children from the CHAMACOS study. Environ Res. 2014;134:149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Furlong MA, Engel SM, Barr DB, Wolff MS. Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and reciprocal social behavior in childhood. Environ Int. 2014;70:125–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Furlong MA, Herring A, Buckley JP, Goldman BD, Daniels JL, Engel LS, et al. Prenatal exposure to organophosphorus pesticides and childhood neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Environ Res. 2017;158:737–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Sagiv SK, Kogut K, Harley K, Bradman A, Morga N, Eskenazi B. Gestational exposure to organophosphate pesticides and longitudinally assessed behaviors related to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and executive function. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190:2420–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Beauvais SL, Jones SB, Parris JT, Brewer SK, Little EE. Cholinergic and Behavioral Neurotoxicity of Carbaryl and Cadmium to Larval Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2001;49:84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang H, Liang Y, Sun Y, Hou W, Chen J, Long D, et al. Subchronic neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and their combination in rats. Environ Toxicol. 2014;29:1193–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee I, Eriksson P, Fredriksson A, Buratovic S, Viberg H. Developmental neurotoxic effects of two pesticides: behavior and biomolecular studies on chlorpyrifos and carbaryl. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015;288:429–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seleem AA. Teratogenicity and neurotoxicity effects induced by methomyl insecticide on the developmental stages of Bufo arabicus. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2019;72:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Habotta OA, Elbahnaswy S, Ibrahim I. Neurotoxicity of singular and combined exposure of Oreochromis niloticus to methomyl and copper sulphate at environmentally relevant levels: assessment of neurotransmitters, neural stress, oxidative injury and histopathological changes. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022;94:103935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Savy CY, Fitchett AE, Blain PG, Morris CM, Judge SJ. Gene expression analysis reveals chronic low level exposure to the pesticide diazinon affects psychological disorders gene sets in the adult rat. Toxicology. 2018;393:90–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ, Fumagalli F. Exposure to organophosphates reduces the expression of neurotrophic factors in neonatal rat brain regions: similarities and differences in the effects of Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon on the fibroblast growth factor superfamily. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:909–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hawkey A, Pippen E, White H, Kim J, Greengrove E, Kenou B, et al. Gestational and perinatal exposure to diazinon causes long-lasting neurobehavioral consequences in the rat. Toxicology. 2020;429:152327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Timofeeva OA, Roegge CS, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA, Levin ED. Persistent cognitive alterations in rats after early postnatal exposure to low doses of the organophosphate pesticide, diazinon. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2008;30:38–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Grijota M, Nielsen GL, Rothman KJ, Sørensen HT. Association of Apgar score at five minutes with long-term neurologic disability and cognitive function in a prevalence study of Danish conscripts. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Bell ML, Belanger K. Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22:429–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chen L, Bell EM, Caton AR, Druschel CM, Lin S. Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for ambient air pollution exposure misclassification. Environ Res. 2010;110:162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Northam S, Knapp TR. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant number R00ES028743).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ARY contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing. KLP contributed to manuscript writing and provided feedback. KCP contributed to manuscript writing and provided feedback. EJB contributed to manuscript writing and provided feedback. BR contributed to manuscript writing and provided feedback. PIB contributed to manuscript writing and provided feedback. MAF contributed to data extraction, data analysis, manuscript writing, and provided feedback.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey R. Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Study protocols and data procedures were approved by the University of Arizona’s Institutional Review Board (IRB #1806679925). We received a waiver for informed consent. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, A.R., Parra, K.L., Paul, K.C. et al. Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide exposures during preconception and pregnancy and associations with Apgar scores in the Az-PEAR study (2006–2020). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-026-00849-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-026-00849-8

Keywords

Search

Quick links