Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Evaluation of clinically asymptomatic high risk infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Abstract

Objective

To determine the frequency of abnormal findings on evaluation of neonates with congenital CMV infection who have a normal physical examination

Study design

Retrospective, 2-center study (1996–2017) that reviewed results of complete blood cell count and platelets, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin concentrations, eye examination, cranial ultrasonography or other neuroimaging, and brainstem evoked responses performed on neonates with congenital CMV infection and a normal physical examination

Results

Of 34 infants with congenital CMV infection and a normal physical examination, 56% (19/34) had ≥1 abnormality: 39%, elevated ALT concentration; 45%, abnormal neuroimaging (five, lenticulostriate vasculopathy; six, intraventricular hemorrhage; four, calcifications); 12%, anemia; 16%, thrombocytopenia; and 3%, chorioretinitis. Seven (21%) infants had sensorineural hearing loss, and 18 infants received antiviral therapy.

Conclusion

Some infants with congenital CMV infection and a normal physical examination had abnormalities on laboratory or neuroimaging evaluation, which in some cases prompted antiviral treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:86–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dollard SC, Grosse SD, Ross DS. New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17:355–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boppana SB, Ross SA, Shimamura M, Palmer AL, Ahmed A, Michaels MG, et al. Saliva polymerase-chain-reaction assay for cytomegalovirus screening in newborns. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:2111–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Foulon I, Naessens A, Foulon W, Casteels A, Gordts F. A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2008;153:84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Madden C, Wiley S, Schleiss M, Benton C, Meinzen-Derr J, Greinwald J, et al. Audiometric, clinical and educational outcomes in a pediatric symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) population with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:1191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantey JB, Sanchez PJ. Overview of congenital infections: the prominence of cytomegalovirus. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2011;11:426–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler KB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: audiologic outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:S182–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rivera LB, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Pass RF. Predictors of hearing loss in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 2002;110:762–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross SA, Ahmed A, Palmer AL, Michaels MG, Sanchez PJ, Bernstein DI, et al. Detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of saliva or urine specimens. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1415–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boppana SB, Ross SA, Novak Z, Shimamura M, Tolan RW Jr, Palmer AL, et al. Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA. 2010;303:1375–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stehel EK, Shoup AG, Owen KE, Jackson GL, Sendelbach DM, Boney LF, et al. Newborn hearing screening and detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 2008;121:970–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duryea EL, Sanchez PJ, Sheffield JS, Jackson GL, Wendel GD, McElwee BS, et al. Maternal human immunodeficiency virus infection and congenital transmission of cytomegalovirus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29:915–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellington SR, Clarke KE, Kourtis AP. Cytomegalovirus Infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Exposed and HIV-Infected Infants: a systematic review. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:891–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jopling J, Henry E, Wiedmeier SE, Christensen RD. Reference ranges for hematocrit and blood hemoglobin concentration during the neonatal period: data from a multihospital health care system. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e333–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in children. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

  16. Rawlinson WD, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Kimberlin DW, Lazzarotto T, Alain S, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy and the neonate: consensus recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e177–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoji K, Ito N, Ito Y, Inoue N, Adachi S, Fujimaru T, et al. Is a 6-week course of ganciclovir therapy effective for chorioretinitis in infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection? J Pediatr. 2010;157:331–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coors LE, Spencer R. Delayed presentation of cytomegalovirus retinitis in an infant with severe congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Retina. 2010;30:S59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghekiere S, Allegaert K, Cossey V, Van Ranst M, Cassiman C, Casteels I. Ophthalmological findings in congenital cytomegalovirus infection: when to screen, when to treat? J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012;49:274–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cantey JB, Sisman J. The etiology of lenticulostriate vasculopathy and the role of congenital infections. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91:427–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El Ayoubi M, de Bethmann O, Monset-Couchard M. Lenticulostriate echogenic vessels: clinical and sonographic study of 70 neonatal cases. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bilavsky E, Schwarz M, Pardo J, Attias J, Levy I, Haimi-Cohen Y, et al. Lenticulostriated vasculopathy is a high-risk marker for hearing loss in congenital cytomegalovirus infections. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:e388–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amir J, Atias J, Linder N, Pardo J. Follow-up of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus and normal fetal imaging. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101:F428–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amir J, Schwarz M, Levy I, Haimi-Cohen Y, Pardo J. Is lenticulostriated vasculopathy a sign of central nervous system insult in infants with congenital CMV infection? Arch Dis Child. 2011;96:846–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, Van Hoecke H, Keymeulen A, Dhooge I. Hearing loss and congenital CMV infection: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:972–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergevin A, Zick CD, McVicar SB, Park AH. Cost-benefit analysis of targeted hearing directed early testing for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:2090–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Sabo DL, Shoup AG, Owen KE, Woodruff JL, et al. A targeted approach for congenital cytomegalovirus screening within newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20162128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diener ML, Zick CD, McVicar SB, Boettger J, Park AH. Outcomes from a hearing-targeted cytomegalovirus screening program. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20160789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cannon MJ, Griffiths PD, Aston V, Rawlinson WD. Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev Med Virol. 2014;24:291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronchi A, Shimamura M, Malhotra PS, Sanchez PJ. Encouraging postnatal cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening: the time is NOW for universal screening! Expert Rev Anti Infective Ther. 2017;15:417–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gantt S, Dionne F, Kozak FK, Goshen O, Goldfarb DM, Park AH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of universal and targeted newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;107:906.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kimberlin DW, Jester PM, Sanchez PJ, Ahmed A, Arav-Boger R, Michaels MG, et al. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:933–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliver SE, Cloud GA, Sanchez PJ, Demmler GJ, Dankner W, Shelton M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following ganciclovir therapy in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infections involving the central nervous system. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:S22–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Sanchez PJ, Demmler GJ, Dankner W, Shelton M, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143:16–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Forner G, Abate D, Mengoli C, Palu G, Gussetti N. High cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia predicts CMV sequelae in asymptomatic congenitally infected newborns born to women with primary infection during pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 2015;212:67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

AR received grant support from “A. Griffini—J. Miglierina” Fundation—Provincia di Varese Piazza Libertà 1- 21100 Varese-Italy. The Fundation was not involved in the (1) study design, (2) the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; (3) the writing of the report; and (4) the decision to submit the paper for publication. AR wrote the first draft of the paper. The other authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AR, had full access to all study data and is responsible for the data integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. He participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, initial and subsequent drafts of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. FZ, participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, critical revision of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. LE.L, participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, critical revision of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. KE.O, participated in the study design, acquisition of data, critical revision of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. AG.S, participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, critical revision of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. FG, had full access to all study data and is responsible for the data integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. She participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, initial and subsequent drafts of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. LN.V, had full access to all study data and is responsible for the data integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. She participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, initial and subsequent drafts of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. JB.C, had full access to all study data and is responsible for the data integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. He participated in the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, initial and subsequent drafts of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. SV, participated in the acquisition of data, critical revision of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted. LP, supervised the overall study by analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final paper as submitted. FM, supervised the overall study by analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the paper for important intellectual content, and approved the final paper as submitted. PJ.S, had full access to all study data and is responsible for the data integrity and accuracy of the data analysis. He supervised the overall study by developing the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, initial and subsequent drafts of the paper, and approved the final paper as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo J. Sánchez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The study was presented in part at the 4th Congenital Cytomegalovirus Conference, San Francisco, CA, October 29–31, 2012, and at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, May 3–6, 2014

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ronchi, A., Zeray, F., Lee, L.E. et al. Evaluation of clinically asymptomatic high risk infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Perinatol 40, 89–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0501-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0501-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links