Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: scholarship perspective

Abstract

Neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows must achieve a meaningful accomplishment in scholarly activity as part of their training. Despite the requirement for scholarly training in fellowship, there is a vanishingly small number of MD-only physician-scientists pursuing a research-oriented career. Recent neonatal trainees have identified several factors that preclude their careers in research-focused academic neonatology, including lower pay in academic positions, inadequate training in research techniques, and the perception that individuals in research careers have a poor work-life balance. High competition for limited pediatric research funds also contributes to a diminishing pool of physician-scientists in neonatology. This small number of physician-scientists is threatened by a high rate of attrition among physicians who enter this career path. In order to prevent further declines in the number of neonatal physician-scientists, we need improvements in funding and strong intra- and cross-institutional mentorship to foster individuals interested in a career as a physician-scientist.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stafford D, Nocton J, Parker T, Ryan S, Sauer C, Trimm F et al. EPA 15 for general pediatrics. Am Board Pediatr. https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/gen_peds_epa_15.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2020.

  2. The American Board of Pediatrics. Training requirements for subspecialty certification. Am Board Pediatr. https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/trainingrequirements.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2020.

  3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. Perinat Med. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/329_NeonatalPerinatalMedicine_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-19-105945-263. Accessed 19 Jul 2020.

  4. Freed GL, Dunham KM, Moran LM, Spera L, McGuinness GA, Stevenson DK. Fellowship program directors perspectives on fellowship training. Pediatrics. 2014;133:S64–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freed GL, Dunham KM, Moran LM, Spera L, McGuinness GA, Stevenson DK. Pediatric subspecialty fellowship clinical training project: recent graduates and midcareer survey comparison. Pediatrics. 2014;133:S70–S75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1254–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz AL. Physician-scientist career awards and a dilemma: national institute of child health and human development K awards—individual, institutional, or national? JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:218–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai WW, Vetter VL, Richmond M, Li JS, Saul JP, Mital S, et al. Clinical research careers: reports from a NHLBI Pediatric Heart Network Clinical Research Skills Development Conference. Am Heart J. 2011;161:13–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gitterman DP, Langford WS, Hay WW. The fragile state of the National Institutes of Health Pediatric Research Portfolio, 1992-2015: doing more with less? JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:287–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Good M, McElroy SJ, Berger JN, Wynn JL. Name and characteristics of National Institutes of Health R01-funded pediatric physician-scientists: hope and challenges for the vanishing pediatric physician-scientists. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:297–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Institutes of Health. Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report. NIH; 2020 https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/PSW_Report_ACD_06042014.pdf. Accessed 19 Jul 2020.

  12. Milewicz DM, Lorenz RG, Dermody TS, Brass LF. National Association of MDPPEC. Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3742–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Menon G, Turner MA, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Greenough A. Training in research competencies: a strategy for neonatology. Arch Dis Child-Educ Pr. 2017;102:51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Twombly DA, Glavin SL, Guimond J, Taymans S, Spong CY, Bianchi DW. Association of National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Career Development Awards with Subsequent Research Project Grant Funding. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:226–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Conte ML, Omary MB. NIH Career Development Awards: conversion to research grants and regional distribution. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:5187–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Penn AA. Perspectives of recent trainees on career choices in neonatology. J Perinatol. 2006;26:S53–S56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hostetter MK. Success for the physician-scientist in a resource-limited environment. J Pediatr. 2012;161:1–2.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal SL. Preventing burnout among academic medicine leaders: experiencing leadership flow. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:636–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher E, Rapoza D. Issues and solutions in accurately measuring clinical full-time equivalents. J Pediatr. 2010;157:697–.e1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsen S, Kilbride H. Development of a points-based system for determining workload for a neonatology full-time equivalent. J Perinatol J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2018;38:1595–601.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Regan L, Stahmer S, Nyce A, Nelson BP, Moscati R, Gisondi MA, et al. Scholarly tracks in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:S87–S94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

MG is supported by R01DK118568 from the National Institutes of Health, the St. Louis Children’s Hospital Foundation, the Children’s Discovery Institute of Washington University and St. Louis Children’s Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.

ONTPD Fellowship Directors Writing Group:

Heather French6, Kris Reber7, Erin Cicalese8, Karena Lawrence9, Brittany Schwarz10, Allison Payne11, Robert Angert12, Maria Gillam-Krakauer13, Jotishna Sharma14, Elizabeth Bonachea15, Jennifer Trzaski16, Lindsay Johnston17, Rita Dadiz18, Josephine Enciso19, Alison Falck20, Mackenzie Frost6, Megan Gray21, Susan Izatt22, Sara Kane23, Autumn Kiefer24, Kristen Leeman25, Sabrina Malik26, Patrick Myers27, Jayasree Nair28, Deirdre O’Reilly29, Taylor Sawyer21, M. Cody Smith30, Kate Stanley31, Jennifer Wambach32, C. Lydia Wraight33

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misty Good.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

MG has received sponsored research agreement funding from Astarte Medical Partners and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. PC has received funding from Elsevier publishing and Medstudy. None of these sources had any role in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauserman, M., Vasquez, M., Chess, P.R. et al. Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: scholarship perspective. J Perinatol 42, 528–533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00957-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00957-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links