Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Stabilization, respiratory care and survival of extremely low birth weight infants transferred on the first day of life

Abstract

Objective

To assess stabilization, respiratory care and survival of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g at birth) infants requiring emergency transfer to tertiary NICUs on the first day of life.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study of 55 ELBW infants transported by a dedicated neonatal transport service over a 65-month period. Ventilator data were downloaded computationally.

Results

95% of infants were intubated and received surfactant prior to transfer. Median expired tidal volume was 5.0 mL/kg (interquartile range: 4.6–6.2 mL/kg). Infants ventilated with SIPPV had significantly higher mean airway pressure and minute ventilation, but similar FiO2 compared to babies on SIMV. Blood gases showed significant improvement during transport. 55% of infants survived to discharge from NICU.

Conclusion

Most ELBW infants transferred on the first day of life require mechanical ventilation and can be ventilated with 5 mL/kg tidal volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Clinical and transport characteristics of ELBW infants transferred on the first day of life.
Fig. 2: Blood gases performed before and after the transport of ELBW infants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Analysis steps can be accessed via GitHub code repository at https://github.com/belteki/transport_ELBW.

References

  1. Doyle LW, Ford G, Davis N. Health and hospitalizations after discharge in extremely low birth weight infants. Semin Neonatol. 2003;8:137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheong JLY, Wark JD, Cheung MM, Irving L, Burnett AC, Lee KJ, et al. Impact of extreme prematurity or extreme low birth weight on young adult health and wellbeing: the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study (VICS) 1991–1992 Longitudinal Cohort study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades: I. Effectiveness. Pediatrics. 2004;113:505–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marlow N, Bryan Gill A. Establishing neonatal networks: the reality. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marlow N, Bennett C, Draper ES, Hennessy EM, Morgan AS, Costeloe KL. Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England:the EPICure 2 study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F181–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohamed MA, Aly H. Transport of premature infants is associated with increased risk for intraventricular haemorrhage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F403–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gajendragadkar G, Boyd JA, Potter DW, Mellen BG, Hahn GD, Shenai JP. Mechanical vibration in neonatal transport: a randomized study of different mattresses. J Perinatol. 2000;20:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levene MI, Fawer CL, Lamont RF. Risk factors in the development of intraventricular haemorrhage in the preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:410–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan G, Colontuono J, Carlos C. Neonatal Respiratory Support on Transport. Neoreviews. 2019;20:e202–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa JD, Sadashiv S, Hesler J, Locke RG, Blackson TJ, Mackley AB. Tidal volume monitoring during emergency neonatal transport. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1631–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Belteki G, Szell A, Lantos L, Kovacs G, Szanto G, Berenyi A, et al. Volume Guaranteed Ventilation During Neonatal Transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:1170–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:700–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escrig-Fernández R, Zeballos-Sarrato G, Gormaz-Moreno M, Avila-Alvarez A, Toledo-Parreño JD, Vento M. The Respiratory Management of the Extreme Preterm in the Delivery Room. Child. 2023;10:351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Massirio P, De Paolis FM, Calevo MG, Cardiello V, Andreato C, Minghetti D, et al. Intubation Rate Evaluation of Inborn Versus Outborn Premature Newborns Affected by Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Impact of Neonatal Transport. Air Med J. 2022;41:346–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams E, Dassios T, Dixon P, Greenough A. Physiological dead space and alveolar ventilation in ventilated infants. Pediatr Res. 2022;91:218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keszler M, Nassabeh-Montazami S, Abubakar K. Evolution of tidal volume requirement during the first 3 weeks of life in infants <800 g ventilated with Volume Guarantee. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F279–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keszler M, Montaner MB, Abubakar K. Effective ventilation at conventional rates with tidal volume below instrumental dead space: a bench study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurley EH, Keszler M. Effect of inspiratory flow rate on the efficiency of carbon dioxide removal at tidal volumes below instrumental dead space. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:F126–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klingenberg C, Wheeler KI, McCallion N, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10:CD003666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vervenioti A, Fouzas S, Tzifas S, Karatza AA, Dimitriou G. Work of Breathing in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Neonates. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21:430–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Batra D, Jaysainghe D, Batra N. Supporting all breaths versus supporting some breaths during synchronised mechanical ventilation in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023;108:408–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lantos L, Széll A, Chong D, Somogyvári Z, Belteki G. Acceleration during neonatal transport and its impact on mechanical ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023;108:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to Rainer Kühner (Vyaire) for help with exporting data from the fabian +nCPAP evolution™ and fabian HFO ventilators. We thank to Miklos Szabo (Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary) for sharing national statistics on ELBW infants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VB participated in the conception of the study, collected clinical information, participated in interpretation of results, and edited the manuscript. LL participated in acquisition and interpretation of clinical data and revising the article. AV participated in interpretation of clinical data. AJ participated in interpretation of clinical data and revising the article. ZsS participated ins interpretation of clinical data and revising the article. GB was responsible for the conception of the study, the outline of statistical analysis and interpretation of data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gusztav Belteki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

GB is a consultant to Vyaire Medical (Mettawa, IL, US) and Dräger Medical (Lübeck, Germany). Vyaire Medical did not participate in this research and did not provide any payment for it. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Scientific and Medical Research Council Ethics Committee of Hungary (reference: 40158-2/2018/EKU). Parental consent was waived. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balog, V., Lantos, L., Valek, A. et al. Stabilization, respiratory care and survival of extremely low birth weight infants transferred on the first day of life. J Perinatol 45, 500–505 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02043-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02043-w

Search

Quick links