Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Immediate heart rate changes in late preterm infants receiving resuscitation in the delivery room

Abstract

Objectives

Assess heart rate (HR) trends in the minutes following delivery in late preterm infants 34–36 6/7 weeks with spontaneous respirations and compare trends in infants with delayed transition requiring interventions and assess the direct potential impact of these interventions on HR changes.

Design

Prospective observational single center study in 20 late preterm infants born via cesarean section utilizing the NeoBeat which uses dry electrode technology to obtain blinded HR measures in infants with spontaneous respirations versus infants requiring interventions i.e.: positive pressure ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure or suctioning.

Results

Initial HR in spontaneously breathing infants (n = 8) was higher versus those requiring interventions, differences that persisted through five minutes. Iatrogenic bradycardia ranging from 65 to 90 beats/minute was induced by interventions in five(42%) of 12 infants.

Conclusions

Initial HR in spontaneously breathing late preterm infants was significantly higher compared to infants who received interventions. Respiratory interventions induced sudden unanticipated bradycardia in many cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Heart rate changes in spontaneously beathing infants (open circles) and those receiving interventions (closed circles) at baseline, and at 60,120,180 240 and 300 s.
Fig. 2: Normal heart rate (HR) pattern in an infant spontaneously breathing.
Fig. 3: HR tracing in an infant delivered limp and apneic.
Fig. 4: An infant was born vigorous and crying with copious secretions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Wyckoff MH, Greif R, Morley PT, Ng KC, Olasveengen TM, Singletary EM, et al. 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation. 2022;146:e483–e557.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation(8th edition) Weiner, Gary M., Zaichkin, Jeanette Editors American Academy of Pediatrics, & American Heart Association.

  3. Bush JB, Cooley V, Perlman J, Chang C. NeoBeat offers rapid newborn heart rate assessment. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021;106:550–2.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Linde JE, Schulz J, Perlman JM, Oymar K, Francis F. Normal newborn heart rate in the first five minutes of life assessed by dry-electrode electrocardiography. Neonatology. 2016;110:231–7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Pike H, EilevstjĆønn J, Bjorland P, Linde J, Ersdal H, Rettedal S. Heart rate detection properties of dry-electrode ECG compared to conventional 3-lead gel-electrode ECG in newborns. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14:166.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Rettedal S, EilevstjĆønn J, Kibsgaard A, KvalĆøy JT, Ersdal H. Comparison of heart rate feedback from dry-electrode ECG, 3-lead ECG, and pulse oximetry during newborn resuscitation. Children. 2021;8:1092.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Bjorland PA, Ersdal HL, EilevstjĆønn J, Ƙymar K, Davis PG, Rettedal SI. Changes in heart rate from 5 s to 5 min after birth in vaginally delivered term newborns with delayed cord clamping. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:311–5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Badurdeen S, Davis PG, Hooper SB, Donath S, Santomartino GA, Heng A, et al. Baby Directed Umbilical Cord Clamping (Baby DUCC) collaborative group. Physiologically based cord clamping for infants ≄32+0 weeks gestation: a randomised clinical trial and reference percentiles for heart rate and oxygen saturation for infants ≄35+0 weeks gestation. PLoS Med. 2022;19:e1004029.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Nerdrum Aagaard E, SolevĆ„g AL, Saugstad OD. Significance of neonatal heart rate in the delivery room—a review. Children. 2023;10:1551.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Pichler G, Baik N, Urlesberger B, Cheung PY, Aziz K, Avian A, et al. Cord clamping time in spontaneously breathing preterm neonates in the first minutes after birth: Impact on cerebral oxygenation—A prospective observational study. J Matern -Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;29:1570–2.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Mukherjee S, Bulsara JS, Das MK, Waratakar Y, Saha AK, Dubei S, et al. Is delaying cord clamping until placenta delivery beneficial? oxygen saturation and heart rate transition during the initial 5 min after delivery in indian healthy newborns. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:738–44.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Kukka AJ, Berkelhamer SK, EilevstjĆønn J, Wood TR, Basnet O, Kc A. Observational study comparing heart rate in crying and non-crying but breathing infants at birth. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7:e001886.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Kuypers KLAM, Hopman A, Cramer SJE, Dekker J, Visser R, Hooper SB, et al. Effect of initial and subsequent mask applications on breathing and heart rate in preterm infants at birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023;108:594–8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Kuypers KLAM, Lamberska T, Martherus T, Dekker J, Bƶhringer S, Hooper SB, et al. The effect of a face mask for respiratory support on breathing in preterm infants at birth. Resuscitation 2019;144:178–84.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Gaertner VD, Rüegger CM, O’Currain E, Kamlin COF, Hooper SB, Davis PG, et al. Physiological responses to facemask application in newborns immediately after birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:381–5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Kuypers K, Martherus T, Lamberska T, Dekker J, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Reflexes that impact spontaneous breathing of preterm infants at birth: a narrative review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105:675–9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Badurdeen S, Brooijmans E, Blank DA, Kuypers KLAM, Te Pas AB, Roberts C, et al. Heart rate changes following facemask placement in infants born at ±32+0weeks of gestation. Neonatology. 2023;120:624–32.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Dawes G, Jacobson H, Mott JC, Shelley HJ, Stafford A. The treatment of asphyxiated, mature foetal lambs and rhesus monkeys with intravenous glucose and sodium carbonate. J Physiol. 1963;169:174.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Purington C, EilevstjĆønn J, Dalen I, Yeconia A, Blacy L, Mduma E, et al. Use of suctioning during newborn resuscitation and its effects on heart rate in a low-resource setting, Tanzania. Children (Basel). 2023;10:1540.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Cordero L Jr, Hon EH. Neonatal bradycardia following nasopharyngeal stimulation. J Pediatr. 1971;78:441–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(71)80224-x.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YD designed the study, recruited the subjects, applied the NeoBeat, reviewed and analyzed the data, drafted the initial manuscript, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript DE helped in the design of the study, helped in the data analysis, revised the manuscript. RM recruited subjects, applied the Neobeat and revised the manuscript. CT facilitated and directed the statistical analysis, revised the manuscript. CO facilitated the recruitment of patients and revised the manuscript. JP provided senior mentoring on all aspects of the study and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Perlman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Weill Cornell Institutional Review Board (FWA # 00000093. Consent was obtained from the parent prior to delivery.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davydova, Y., Elachi, D., Miller, R. et al. Immediate heart rate changes in late preterm infants receiving resuscitation in the delivery room. J Perinatol 45, 1568–1572 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02220-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02220-5

Search

Quick links