Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Oxidative stress and fetal weight: observational findings from a pregnancy cohort in New York City

Abstract

Objective

To examine associations between oxidative stress and fetal weight across pregnancy.

Study design

Cohort study of pregnant participants from 2016-2021 in New York City with urinary lipid, protein, and DNA oxidative stress biomarkers (<18, 18–25, >25 weeks) and estimated fetal weight from ultrasound fetal biometry with the HadlockIII formula (20, 30, 36 weeks).

Result

Among 1408 participants, oxidative stress biomarkers of lipid peroxidation and DNA damage were associated with smaller estimated fetal weight at 30 and 36 weeks (ranging from B = –3.9 grams/unit increase [95% CI: –6.9, –0.9; 8,15 − PGF2α] to –20.3 [95% CI: –27.9, –12.8; 8 − OHdG]), particularly among fetuses at the 25th percentile. Oxidative stress biomarkers of protein damage were associated with larger estimated fetal weight at 20 (3.4 [95% CI: 1.2, 5.7]) and 36 weeks (16.5 [95% CI: 5.2, 27.8]).

Conclusion

These findings advance our understanding of different oxidative stress pathways and their potential role in fetal growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Change in estimated fetal weight for each ln-unit increase in oxidative stress biomarker.
Fig. 2: Change in estimated fetal weight for each ln-unit increase in oxidative stress biomarker at the 25th and 75th percentile.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Choi KH, Martinson ML. The relationship between low birthweight and childhood health: disparities by race, ethnicity, and national origin. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28:704–709.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Milner J, Arezina J. The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review. Ultrasound. 2018;26:32–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Romo A, Carceller R, Tobajas J. Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR): epidemiology and etiology. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2009;6:332–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eick SM, Geiger SD, Alshawabkeh A, Aung M, Barrett E, Bush NR, et al. Associations between social, biologic, and behavioral factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress during pregnancy: findings from four ECHO cohorts. Sci Total Environ. 2022;835:155596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaur R, Kaur J, Mahajan J, Kumar R, Arora S. Oxidative stress—implications, source and its prevention. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:1599–613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Higdon JV, Frei B. Obesity and oxidative stress: a direct link to CVD?. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:365–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber D, Stuetz W, Bernhard W, Franz A, Raith M, Grune T, et al. Oxidative stress markers and micronutrients in maternal and cord blood in relation to neonatal outcome. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:215–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson KK, Meeker JD, McElrath TF, Mukherjee B, Cantonwine DE. Repeated measures of inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:527.e1–527.e9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loy SL, Sirajudeen KNS, Hamid Jan JM. The effects of prenatal oxidative stress levels on infant adiposity development during the first year of life. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2014;5:142–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoots MH, Bourgonje MF, Bourgonje AR, Prins JR, van Hoorn EGM, Abdulle AE, et al. Oxidative stress biomarkers in fetal growth restriction with and without preeclampsia. Placenta. 2021;115:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karowicz-Bilinska A, Kędziora-Kornatowska K, Bartosz G. Indices of oxidative stress in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction. Free Radic Res. 2007;41:870–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takagi Y, Nikaido T, Toki T, Kita N, Kanai M, Ashida T, et al. Levels of oxidative stress and redox-related molecules in the placenta in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Virchows Arch. 2004;444:49–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferguson KK, Kamai EM, Cantonwine DE, Mukherjee B, Meeker JD, McElrath TF. Associations between repeated ultrasound measures of fetal growth and biomarkers of maternal oxidative stress and inflammation in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80:e13017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eick SM, Geiger SD, Alshawabkeh A, Aung M, Barrett ES, Bush N, et al. Urinary oxidative stress biomarkers are associated with preterm birth: an Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes program study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:576.e1–576.e22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cusick SE, Georgieff MK. The role of nutrition in brain development: the golden opportunity of the “First 1000 Days. J Pediatri. 2016;175:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen EM, Van ‘T, Erve TJ, Boss J, Sathyanarayana S, Barrett ES, et al. Urinary oxidative stress biomarkers and accelerated time to spontaneous delivery. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130:419–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trasande L, Ghassabian A, Kahn LG, Jacobson MH, Afanasyeva Y, Liu M, et al. The NYU Children’s Health and Environment Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:305–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arogbokun O, Rosen E, Keil AP, Milne GL, Barrett E, Nguyen R, et al. Maternal oxidative stress biomarkers in pregnancy and child growth from birth to age 6. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1427–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowell W, Jacobson MH, Long SE, Wang Y, Kahn LG, Ghassabian A, et al. Maternal urinary bisphenols and phthalates in relation to estimated fetal weight across mid to late pregnancy. Environ Int. 2023;174:107922.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Heo S, Afanasyeva Y, Liu M, Mehta-Lee S, Yang W, Trasande L, et al. Prenatal exposure to residential greenness, fetal growth, and birth outcomes: a cohort study in New York City. Am J Epidemiol. 2024;kwae436.

  21. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Committee Opinion No 700. Methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e150–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimmer VA, Gomez A, Noh Y, Toussaint N, Khanal B, Wright R, et al. Multi-view Image Reconstruction: Application to Fetal Ultrasound Compounding. In: Melbourne A, Licandro R, DiFranco M, Rota P, Gau M, Kampel M, et al., editors. Data Driven Treatment Response Assessment and Preterm, Perinatal, and Paediatric Image Analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 107–16. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).

  24. Jabaz D, Jenkins SM Sonography 2nd Trimester Assessment, Protocols, and Interpretation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570574/

  25. Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP Births: Final Data for 2022. [cited 2025 Mar 31]; Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/145588

  26. Ford ND Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy and Mortality at Delivery Hospitalization — United States, 2017–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 31];71. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7117a1.htm

  27. Il’yasova D, Scarbrough P, Spasojevic I. Urinary biomarkers of oxidative status. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1446–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferguson KK, McElrath TF, Chen YH, Loch-Caruso R, Mukherjee B, Meeker JD. Repeated measures of urinary oxidative stress biomarkers during pregnancy and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:208.e1–208.e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gyurászová M, Gurecká R, Bábíčková J, Tóthová. Oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of kidney disease: implications for noninvasive monitoring and identification of biomarkers. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:5478708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Petrucci G, Hatem D, Langley R, Cleary S, Gentry-Maharaj A, Pitocco D, et al. Effect of very long-term storage and multiple freeze and thaw cycles on 11-dehydro-thromboxane-B2 and 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α, levels in human urine samples by validated enzyme immunoassays. Sci Rep. 2024;14:5546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kordas K, Ghazal D, Queirolo EI, Olson JR, Beledo MI, Browne RW. Temperature stability of urinary F2-isoprostane and 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine. Pr Lab Med. 2024;39:e00373.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez MP, Kannan K. Simultaneous analysis of seven biomarkers of oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA in urine. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:6647–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boeniger MF, Lowry LK, Rosenberg J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993;54:615–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuiper JR, O’Brien KM, Ferguson KK, Buckley JP. Urinary specific gravity measures in the U.S. population: implications for the adjustment of non-persistent chemical urinary biomarker data. Environ Int. 2021;156:106656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lamichhane DK, Lee SY, Ahn K, Kim KW, Shin YH, Suh DI, et al. Quantile regression analysis of the socioeconomic inequalities in air pollution and birth weight. Environ Int. 2020;142:105875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57:289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ibrahim A, Khoo MI, Ismail EHE, Hussain NHN, Zin AAM, Noordin L, et al. Oxidative stress biomarkers in pregnancy: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;22:93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Frijhoff J, Winyard PG, Zarkovic N, Davies SS, Stocker R, Cheng D, et al. Clinical relevance of biomarkers of oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;23:1144–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Longini M, Perrone S, Kenanidis A, Vezzosi P, Marzocchi B, Petraglia F, et al. Isoprostanes in amniotic fluid: a predictive marker for fetal growth restriction in pregnancy. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005;38:1537–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Forman HJ, Augusto O, Brigelius-Flohe R, Dennery PA, Kalyanaraman B, Ischiropoulos H, et al. Even free radicals should follow some rules: a guide to free radical research terminology and methodology. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;78:233–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yockey LJ, Iwasaki A. Interferons and proinflammatory cytokines in pregnancy and fetal development. Immunity. 2018;49:397–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Oguntibeju OO. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, oxidative stress and inflammation: examining the links. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharm. 2019;11:45–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Yin Q, Li N, Ouyang Z, Zhong M. Plasma markers of oxidative stress in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in the second and third trimester. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016:e3865454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bernardi F, Guolo F, Bortolin T, Petronilho F, Dal-Pizzol F. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34:948–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cai Z, Yan LJ. Protein oxidative modifications: beneficial roles in disease and health. J Biochem Pharm Res. 2013;1:15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rejc B, Kato Y, Karas‑Kuzelicki N, Osredkar J, Gersak K. Lipid-lysine adducts and modified tyrosines as markers of oxidative stress in the second trimester of pregnancy and their association with infant characteristics. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11:797–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kimura C, Watanabe K, Iwasaki A, Mori T, Matsushita H, Shinohara K, et al. The severity of hypoxic changes and oxidative DNA damage in the placenta of early-onset preeclamptic women and fetal growth restriction. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:491–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Zhao S. Cell types of the placenta. In: Vascular Biology of the Placenta [Internet]. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; 2010 [cited 2023 Nov 7]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53245/

  49. Hung TH, Skepper JN, Burton GJ. In vitro ischemia-reperfusion injury in term human placenta as a model for oxidative stress in pathological pregnancies. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:1031–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Gosdin LK Alcohol Consumption and Binge Drinking During Pregnancy Among Adults Aged 18–49 Years — United States, 2018–2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 May 2];71. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7101a2.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health / National Institute for the Environmental Health Sciences (K23ES035461: PI Duh-Leong) as well as the NIH Office of the Director (UG3/UH3OD023305). We would like to thank the NYU CHES staff and participants for their contributions to this project. During preparation of this manuscript, WC was supported by R00ES032029.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CDL was responsible for the conceptualization and design of the study, performed a portion of the statistical analysis, and prepared the original draft. LT contributed to conceptualization, provided resources and supervision, secured funding acquisition, and participated in writing (review and editing). AG contributed to the conceptualization, provided resources and supervision, secured funding acquisition, and participated in writing (review and editing). AG also contributed to the statistical analysis and data curation. WC contributed to the methodology, the statistical analysis, and participated in writing (review and editing). ML, SS, KAP, SEL, YW, and WY all contributed substantially to the statistical analysis, data curation, and refinement of the statistical methodology. YA assisted with data curation, provided resources, and contributed to project administration. SML provided clinical expertise, contributed resources, and participated in writing (review and editing). KK was responsible for the formal analysis related to chemicals/lab analysis, performed validation, provided resources, and participated in writing (review and editing). All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Duh-Leong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duh-Leong, C., Ghassabian, A., Cowell, W. et al. Oxidative stress and fetal weight: observational findings from a pregnancy cohort in New York City. J Perinatol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02464-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02464-1

Search

Quick links