Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Using simulation to prepare multidisciplinary teams and clinical environments for complex fetal interventions and resuscitation

Abstract

Objective

Identify overt and latent weaknesses in preliminary plans for initiating a Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion program.

Study Design

Clinical scenarios involving placement and removal of a fetal tracheal occlusion device for fetuses with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia were simulated. All sessions took place in the actual hospital environments and were captured on video for later playback, transcription and analysis.

Results

Simulation-based investigation produced: • a list of plausible scenarios • lists of equipment required • diagrams of room setup and positioning of personnel • decision trees for each scenario • situation awareness issues • workflow issues • areas requiring additional planning.

Conclusions

Using appropriate patient simulators and task trainers, teams experienced multiple realistic scenarios that facilitated the development of equipment lists, room setup diagrams, and tactics to remediate identified weaknesses. Simulation is a useful strategy to prepare for the implementation of new, high-risk clinical programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data not included in this manuscript is available to readers upon request to the corresponding author (Dr. Halamek).

References

  1. Bergh E, Baschat AA, Cortes MS, Hedrick HL, Ryan G, Lim FY, et al. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion for severe, left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;143:440–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deprest JA, Nicolaides KH, Benachi A, Gractacos E, Ryan G, Persico N, et al. Randomized trial of fetal surgery for severe left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. NEJM. 2021;385:107–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumenfeld YJ, Belfort MA. New approaches to congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wild KT, Rintoul NE, Ades AM, Gebb JS, Moldenhauer JS, Mathew L, et al. The delivery room resuscitation of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion: Beyond the balloon. Fetal Diag Ther. 2024;51:184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsao K, Johnson A. Fetal tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Sem Perinatol. 2020;44:151164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halamek LP, Cady R, Sterling MR. Using briefing, simulation and debriefing to improve human and system performance. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43:151178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sawyer T, Loren D, Halamek LP. Post-event debriefings during neonatal care: Why aren’t we doing them, and how can we start?. J Perinatol. 2016;36:415–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Halamek LP. Simulation and debriefing in neonatology 2016: Mission incomplete. Sem Perinatol. 2016;40:489–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehoczky L, Corroenne R, Espinoza J, Shamshirzas AA, Nassr AA, Donepudi R, et al. Simulation training for urgent postnatal fetal tracheal balloon removal. Two Train Methods Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;281:92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Keefe WS, Schmidt LL, Halamek LP, Castro D, Pickering SP (2022). Defining situation awareness. In: O’Keefe WS, Schmidt LL, Halamek LP, Castro D, Pickering SP, (eds). A Practical Guide to Crew Resource Management for Healthcare Teams. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2022, pp 23-38.

  11. Endsley M. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37:32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby E, Keijzer R. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Current management strategies from antenatal diagnosis to long-term follow-up. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36:415–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sananes N, Basurto D, Cordier AG, Elie C, Russo FM, Benachi A, et al. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with Smart-TO balloon: Study protocol to evaluate effectiveness and safety of non-invasive removal. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0273878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Basurto D, Sananes N, Bleeser T, Valenzuela I, De Leon N, Joyeuz L, et al. Safety and efficacy of smart tracheal occlusion device in diaphragmatic hernia lamb model. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diaz‑Navarro C, Armstrong R, Charnetsk M, Freeman KJ, Koh S Reedy G, et al. Global consensus statement on simulation‑based practice in healthcare. Adv Simul. 2024;9:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following individuals were instrumental in the planning, setup and conduct of the scenarios: Ana Clark RN, Pamela James RN, Diana Powell MSN RN, Lisa Pineda MSN RN, Sebastian Romero CST, Steven Romero CST. Ms. Pineda also transcribed the audio recordings.

Funding

This work was supported by the Endowment of the Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education and the Robert L. Hess Family Endowed Professorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Halamek wrote the simulated scenarios and led the debriefings that followed. Drs. Halamek, Blumenfeld, Balikrishnan, Sylvester, Davis, Yamada and Hintz participated as key healthcare team members in the conduct of the simulated clinical scenarios and the debriefings that followed; they also contributed to the multiple work products described in the manuscript. Mr. Galindo managed all aspects of the audiovisual recordings, including the secure storage of the same. All authors edited and approved the final content of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis P. Halamek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Because this work is considered quality improvement IRB approval was waived.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halamek, L.P., Blumenfeld, Y.J., Balikrishnan, K. et al. Using simulation to prepare multidisciplinary teams and clinical environments for complex fetal interventions and resuscitation. J Perinatol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02508-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02508-6

Search

Quick links