Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Treatment-free remission after two nilotinib consolidation durations in chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib: Phase 3 ENESTPath results

Abstract

The phase 3 ENESTPath study investigated treatment-free remission (TFR) rates in patients with chronic Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) and/or BCR::ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia who had not achieved deep molecular response (DMR) after >2 years of imatinib treatment and were switched to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID). After 24 months of treatment, patients with a stable DMR were randomized to either enter the TFR phase (Arm 1) or continue nilotinib consolidation for an additional 12 months and then enter the TFR phase if in stable DMR (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained in TFR (≥MR4.0 [BCR::ABL1IS ≤ 0.01%]) without molecular relapse at the end of 12 months. Of the 620 patients enrolled, 239 (38.5%) achieved stable MR4.0 and were randomized to Arm 1 (n = 120) or Arm 2 (n = 119). In the TFR phase, MR4.0 rates at 12 months (Arm 1: 31.9%, Arm 2: 37.5%; p = 0.383) and 24 months (Arm 1: 29.4%, Arm 2: 30.8%) revealed no differences in TFR success between 2 and 3 years of nilotinib. Irrespective of the consolidation duration, switching to nilotinib 300 mg BID provided the opportunity to achieve TFR if patients were unable to reach stable DMR with first-line imatinib.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Study design.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Patient disposition.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: MR4.0 and MR4.5 rates at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months in the TFR phase.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Kaplan–Meier-estimated TFS in all patients who entered the TFR phase.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: MMR, MR4.0, and MR4.5 rates at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months in the re-treatment phase.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided are anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The availability of this trial data is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

References

  1. Tasigna (Nilotinib) Prescribing Information. 2024. Available from: https://www.novartis.com/us-en/sites/novartis_us/files/tasigna.pdf.

  2. Tasigna (Nilotinib) Summary of Product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/tasigna-epar-product-information_en.pdf.

  3. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Hughes TP, Larson RA, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial. Leukemia. 2016;30:1044–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34:966–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah NP, Bhatia R, Altman JK, Amaya M, Begna KH, Berman E, et al. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2024;22:43–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Apperley JF, Milojkovic D, Cross NCP, Hjorth-Hansen H, Hochhaus A, Kantarjian H, et al. 2025 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2025;39:1797–813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes TP, Leber B, Cervantes F, Spector N, Pasquini R, Clementino NCD, et al. Sustained deep molecular responses in patients switched to nilotinib due to persistent BCR-ABL1 on imatinib: final ENESTcmr randomized trial results. Leukemia. 2017;31:2529–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rea D, Fodil S, Lengline E, Raffoux E, Cayuela J-M. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia: strategies to optimize success and new directions. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024;19:104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen K-k, Du T-f, Xiong P-s, Fan G-h, Yang W. Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia with losing major molecular response as a definition for molecular relapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2019;9:372.

  11. Cho J, Kim J, Park J, Lim JH, Lee MH. Effect of study-level factors on treatment-free remission rate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:ix95–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saussele S, Richter J, Guilhot J, Gruber FX, Hjorth-Hansen H, Almeida A, et al. Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia (EURO-SKI): a prespecified interim analysis of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:747–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark RE, Polydoros F, Apperley JF, Milojkovic D, Rothwell K, Pocock C, et al. De-escalation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy before complete treatment discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (DESTINY): a non-randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e375–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes TP, Yong AS, Ross DM. The evolution of treatment-free remission. Blood. 2025;blood.2024026310.

  15. Shah NP, Garcia-Gutierrez V, Jimenez-Velasco A, Larson S, Saussele S, Rea D, et al. Dasatinib discontinuation in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and stable deep molecular response: the DASFREE study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:650–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahon FX, Pfirrmann M, Dulucq S, Hochhaus A, Panayiotidis P, Almeida A, et al. European Stop Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Trial (EURO-SKI) in chronic myeloid leukemia: final analysis and novel prognostic factors for treatment-free remission. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:1875–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahon FX, Boquimpani C, Kim DW, Benyamini N, Clementino NCD, Shuvaev V, et al. Treatment-free remission after second-line nilotinib treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from a single-group, phase 2, open-label study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:461–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes TP, Clementino NCD, Fominykh M, Lipton JH, Turkina AG, Moiraghi EB, et al. Long-term treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after second-line nilotinib: ENESTop 5-year update. Leukemia. 2021;35:1631–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagana A, Scalzulli E, Carmosino I, Bisegna ML, Ielo C, Diverio D, et al. Treatment Free Remission (TFR) in Chronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML): analysis of predictive factors and novel baseline scoring system to predict molecular relapse. Eur J Haematol. 2025;115:367–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rea D, Nicolini FE, Tulliez M, Guilhot F, Guilhot J, Guerci-Bresler A, et al. Discontinuation of dasatinib or nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: interim analysis of the STOP 2G-TKI study. Blood. 2017;129:846–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimura S, Imagawa J, Murai K, Hino M, Kitawaki T, Okada M, et al. Treatment-free remission after first-line dasatinib discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (first-line DADI trial): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e218–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hochhaus A, Masszi T, Giles FJ, Radich JP, Ross DM, Gomez Casares MT, et al. Treatment-free remission following frontline nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the ENESTfreedom study. Leukemia. 2017;31:1525–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Y, Zou J, Cheng F, Li W. Treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia and new approaches by targeting leukemia stem cells. Front Oncol. 2021;11:769730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mojtahedi H, Yazdanpanah N, Rezaei N. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells: targeting therapeutic implications. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:603.

  25. Ross DM, Masszi T, Gómez Casares MT, Hellmann A, Stentoft J, Conneally E, et al. Durable treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase following frontline nilotinib: 96-week update of the ENESTfreedom study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:945–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:841–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SE, Choi SY, Song HY, Kim SH, Choi MY, Park JS, et al. Imatinib withdrawal syndrome and longer duration of imatinib have a close association with a lower molecular relapse after treatment discontinuation: the KID study. Haematologica. 2016;101:717–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Richter J, Söderlund S, Lübking A, Dreimane A, Lotfi K, Markevärn B, et al. Musculoskeletal pain in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after discontinuation of imatinib: a tyrosine kinase inhibitor withdrawal syndrome?. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2821–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saußele S, Richter J, Hochhaus A, Mahon FX. The concept of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30:1638–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kantarjian HM, Hughes TP, Larson RA, Kim D-W, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, et al. Long-term outcomes with frontline nilotinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 10-year analysis. Leukemia. 2021;35:440–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients who participated in the ENESTPath clinical trial, investigators, and staff at each participating study site. The authors acknowledge the extraordinary contribution of Dr. Michele Baccarani, who sadly passed away in December 2021. The authors also thank Rajendra Sarkar and Mahmudul Khan for providing their intellectual review for this manuscript and Sanchika Agarwal and Khalid Rahman, employees of Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India, as well as Timothy Harries of Novartis Pharmaceuticals, London, UK, for medical writing assistance funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, in accordance with the Good Publication Practice (GPP) 2022 guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).

Funding

Financial support for medical writing assistance was provided by Novartis Pharma AG. This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DR contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. SK contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. PS contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. JM contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. AI contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. AAK contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. AK contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. AC contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. TM contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. LS contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. JS contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. GS contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. AH contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. DN contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. P Schuld contributed to data analysis, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work. GR contributed to data interpretation, drafting and approval of the final manuscript, and is accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delphine Rea.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DR is on the advisory board for Novartis, Enliven, TERNS, and Ascentage Pharma and is a consultant for TERNS and Novartis. JM received research support from Novartis. AI received consulting fees from Janssen, Swixx, Takeda, Astrazeneca, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Roche; honoraria from Astrazeneca, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Roche, Sobi; travel/meeting support from AbbVie, Sobi; Is on data monitoring/ advisory board at Sobi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, AbbVie, Astellas, Roche, Astrazeneca. AK declared Novartis honoraria membership on an entity’s board of directors or advisory committees, research funding, and speakers bureau. AC has served on advisory boards and has acted as a speaker for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Novartis, and Pfizer. PS declared that he is an employee of Novartis. LS received consulting fees from Xspray Pharma Sweden. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rea, D., Kyrcz-Krzemien, S., Sportoletti, P. et al. Treatment-free remission after two nilotinib consolidation durations in chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib: Phase 3 ENESTPath results. Leukemia 40, 553–561 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02847-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02847-5

Search

Quick links