Table 3 Summary of integrated III–V devices discussed herein

From: Advancements in transfer printing techniques and their applications in photonic integrated circuits

Time

Device

Integration platform

Crucial parameter

TP tool

Ref.

2019

C-band SOA

Si

Gain = 17 dB, on-chip peak output power = 10 dBm@170 mA

X-Celeprint μTP-100

91

2020

C-band SOA

Si

Gain = 23 dB, on-chip saturation power = 9.2 mW@140 mA (high Γ)

Gain = 17 dB, on-chip saturation power = 15 mW@160 mA (low Γ)

X-Celeprint μTP-100

92

2023

SOA@ 1573 nm

Si

Gain = 9.4 dB, output saturation power = 15.4 dBm@ 114 mA (left), 140 mA (right)

/

93

2020

SOA@ 1550 nm

SiN

Gain = 14 dB, output saturation power = 8 mW@120 mA

X-Celeprint μTP-100

94

2012

Fabry-Perot laser@ 824 nm

Si

Modulation bandwidth >3 GHz, total optical power >60 mW, operating temperature >100 °C

PDMS stamp with well-defined posts

97

2012

Membrane reflector VCSEL

Si

Output power ~10 μW, power efficiency <0.1%

PDMS stamp

98

2018

DFB laser@ 1550 nm

Si

SMSR > 40 dB, waveguide-coupled output power = 2.2 mW@70 mA

X-Celeprint μTP-100

100

2023

Co-integration of DFB laser and OPA

Si

SMSR > 28 dB, waveguide-coupled output power = 14 dBm@270 mA

PDMS stamp with a single post with 40 µm × 1200 µm

101

2022

Narrow-linewidth laser

Si

Wavelength tuning scope >100 nm

X-Celeprint μTP-100

87

2023

O-band QD-laser

SOI/SiN

Waveguide-coupled power = 1 mW@85 mA (220 nm SOI), 0.95 mW@85 mA (300 nm SiN), 1.7 mW@85 mA (3 μm SOI)

Single PDMS stamp

102

2021

VCSEL@ 850 nm

SiN

SMSR >45 dB, waveguide-coupled output power >100 μW

X-Celeprint μTP-100

104

2022

GaAs photo-detector

Glass

Response time = 2.5 ms, recovery time = 8 ms, responsivity >104 A W−1, detectivity >1014 Jones, external quantum efficiency >106, photoconductive gain >104@1 V

PI interlayer

108

2023

InGaAs photo-detector

SOI

Responsivity = 0.6 A W−1@48 nA dark current, 3-dB bandwidth = 17.5 GHz

PDMS stamp with post size of 20 × 50 µm2

109

2016

LED

SOI

3-dB bandwidth = 130 nm

Patterned PDMS stamp with posts

110

2024

O-band InP-InGaAs photodiode

SiN

Responsivity = 0.9 A W−1@ −3 V, 1310 nm

/

111

2024

EAM@ 1550 nm

SOI

Electrical bandwidth = 40 GHz, ER = 30 dB@−6–0 V

80 × 500-μm2 PDMS stamp

116

2023

TFLN modulator

SiN

Half voltage = 14.8 V, insertion loss = 3.3 dB, ER = 39 dB, 3-dB bandwidth >50 GHz

/

118

2024

TFLN ring modulator

Si

Insertion loss = −1.5 dB,

ER = −37 dB, electro-optical bandwidth = 16 GHz, modulation rate = 45 Gbit s−1

/

119

2025

TFLN-on-MZI modulator

SiN

Half voltage = 3.2 V, propagation loss = 0.9 dB cm−1, transition loss = 1.8 dB facet−1

PDMS stamp

120

2025

TFLN micro-ring optical filter

SiN

3-dB bandwidth = 1.2 GHz, tuning efficiency = 2 pm V−1, response time <3 ns, static ER > 20 dB, Q-factor = 105

A PDMS stamp with a racetrack-shaped post

121,122

2022

MZI switch

Si

Optical gain = 10 dB, 3-dB bandwidth >30 nm @SOA, improvement of optical cross-talk suppression = 56 dB

X-Celeprint μTP-100

125

2025

Cascaded TFLN optical switch

SiN

3-dB bandwidth >100 nm, crosstalk <−45 dB, response time <3 ns

/

126