Table 2 Functional biclusters (coverage of 97%). Five sets selected based on subject’s coverage, risk, and difference from “others” (uniqueness of subjects and/or connections).

From: Temperament & Character account for brain functional connectivity at rest: A diathesis-stress model of functional dysregulation in psychosis

Network (Name)

ANOVA p

Connections #

Subjects #

SZ #

BP #

Controls #

Risk

SZ %

BP %

Group 1

(Avoidant-Anhedonic)

1.2

E−07

279

11

5

6

0

1.00

45

55

Group 2

(Sensitive-Disorganized)

9.9

E−12

1077

27

10

17

0

1.00

37

63

Group 3

(Asocial-Blocked)

6.1

E−06

366

10

4

6

0

1.00

40

60

Group 4

(Fragile-Avolitional)

6.5

E−15

627

35

17

18

0

1.00

49

51

Group 5

(Explosive-Inattentive)

9.3

E−04

209

16

8

8

0

1.00

50

50

  1. Individuals in each fMRI groups were all diagnosed with SZ or BP (risk = 1) and accounted for 97% of the connections observed. None were controls. Significance was tested by ANOVA for patients versus controls.
Back to article page