Table 2 Neuroimaging studies of social pain.

From: The impact of psychosocial adversity on brain and behaviour: an overview of existing knowledge and directions for future research

Study, location

Participants

Mean age (SD; range)

% Female

Exposure

Study design; covariates

Primary findings

Peer victimisation

Eckstrand et al. [185]

USA

81 participants

17.42 (2.16; 15–22)

59%

Victimisation questionnaire

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, head movement

Sexual orientation victimisation was related to higher medial prefrontal cortex activation.

Corr et al. [186]

USA

73 participants

12.8 (2.2; 9–16)

42%

Juvenile Victimisation Questionnaire

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, medication, psychiatry diagnosis

Greater polyvictimization was associated with reduced functional connectivity between the default mode and salience network.

Telzer et al. [57]

USA

38 females measured across 7 years

15.43 (0.33; 14.9–16.3)

Social Experiences Questionnaire-Revised

Longitudinal

Greater severity of peer victimisation was linked to heightened activation in the amygdala, ventral striatum, fusiform gyrus, and temporoparietal junction in response to in-group compared to out-group peers.

Telzer et al. [187]

USA

46 females measured across 7 years

15.3 (0.34; 14.8–16.1)

Social Experiences Questionnaire-Revised

Longitudinal

Victimised girls showed greater reactivity in affective sensitivity, including the bilateral amygdala, ventral striatum, and orbitofrontal cortex as well as regions involved in social cognition, including the medial prefrontal, temporal parietal junction, and medical posterior parietal cortex.

Quinlan et al. [55]

Europe

682 participants from IMAGEN cohort

Baseline: 14.4 (0.4) Follow-up 1: 16.5 (0.6) Follow-up 2: 19.0 (0.7)

54%

Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire

Longitudinal

Covariates: Sex, study site, SES, pubertal status, and change in intracranial volume

Chronic peer victimisation was associated with steeper decreases in left putamen volume.

Muetzel et al. [54]

Netherlands

2602 participants from Generation R

Teacher report: 6.6 (4.6–9.6)

Parent report: 8.1 (7.5–9.9)

MRI: 10.09 (0.57; 8.5–11.9)

51%

Bullying Involvement Assessment

Longitudinal

Covariates: Age, Sex, Ethnicity, maternal education, Child’s non-verbal IQ and psychiatric illness.

Children classified as frequent targets of bullying showed thicker cortex in the fusiform gyrus.

Loneliness

Kong et al. [60]

China

308 participants

19.94 (1.27; 18–27)

54.2%

UCLA loneliness scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, total GMV

Lonely individuals had greater regional grey matter volume in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which might reflect immature functioning in terms of emotional regulation.

Düzel et al. [59]

Germany

319 participants from Berlin Aging Study

70.1 (3.7; 61–88)

50.9%

UCLA loneliness scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, education, social network size, depressive affect, openness, morbidity, total intracranial volume, time interval between MRI and assessment

Loneliness was associated with smaller GMV in the left amygdala/anterior hippocampus, left posterior parahippocampus, and left cerebellum.

Liégeois et al. [188]

USA

419 participants from Human Connectome Project

Replication in 328 adults

NR (22–35)

Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, race, motion, motion.

Static and dynamic FC explain loneliness equally well, while specifically dynamic FC encodes cognitive tasks like working memory.

Mwilambwe-Tshilobo et al. [64]

USA

942 participants from Human Connectome Project

28.0 (3.5; 22–37)

53.7%

Loneliness survey from the NIH Toolbox on Emotion

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, gender, MMSE, positive affect, and personality measures

Loneliness associated with dense, lower modularity (increased integration) between default, frontoparietal, attention and perceptual networks.

Tao et al. [61]

USA

1829 participants from Framingham Heart Study

46.3 (8.6)

54%

One-item loneliness measure

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, education, and the time between assessments

Persistent loneliness was associated with smaller temporal lobe volume.

Cumulative loneliness score was associated with smaller brain volumes in the hippocampus and with enlarged lateral ventricles.

Brilliant et al. [70]

Japan

1336 participants

20.8 (1.7; 18–27)

43.48%

Revised UCLA loneliness scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex

Loneliness was associated with higher functional connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and supplementary motor area, precentral gyrus, and superior parietal lobule.

Kiesow et al. [189]

United Kingdom

10,129 participants from UK Biobank

55 (7.5; 40–69)

52.4%

One-item loneliness measure

Cross sectional

Greater volumetric deviations of the amygdala between lonely and non-lonely males compared to females and more volumetric deviations in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and visual sensory network in between lonely and non-lonely females compared to males.

Spreng et al. [63]

United Kingdom

38,701 participants from UK Biobank

54.9 (7.5; 40–69)

56.38%

One-item loneliness measure

Cross sectional

Increased functional connectivity of the default mode network was observed in lonely individuals.

Velpen et al. [62]

Netherlands

3,737 (cross-sectional), 3,720 (longitudinal) participants from Rotterdam Study

59.6 (8; 45.5–92.7)

54.7%

One-item loneliness measure

Longitudinal: Median follow up time 4.1 years.

Covariates: age, sex, and total intracranial volume

Participants with better perceived social support had larger total brain volumes. They also had a less steep decline in total brain volume over time than those with suboptimal social support.

Affective loss

Chen et al. [77]

56 participants

69.5 (8.61)

26%

Inventory of Complicated Grief

Longitudinal

Covariates: age, sex, education and voxelwise grey matter concentration

Increased amygdala functional connectivity.

Perez et al. [88]

Netherlands

5501 participants from Rotterdam cohort

61.55 (8.95)

53.8%

Inventory of Complicated Grief

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, education, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, depression and anxiety, current depressive symptoms and alcohol consumption. 

Smaller brain volume.

Blair et al. [76]

USA

66 participants

66.1 (8.9; 51–87)

69%

Inventory of Complicated Grief

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, time since loss, depressive score and TGMV.

Higher functional connectivity between ventral caudate and the medial prefrontal, orbitofrontal, and subgenual cingulate cortices.

Arizmendi et al. [78]

USA

28 participants

71.9 (62–82)

81%

Inventory of Complicated Grief

Cross sectional

Complicated Grief showed an absence of increased rostral ACC (rACC) and fronto-cortical recruitment in emotional task.

Freed et al. [82]

USA

20 participants

37.8 (13.1; 22–62)

Emotional Stroop task

Cross sectional

High DLPFC-amygdala connectivity correlated with reduced attentional bias, while low rACC-amygdala connectivity predicted sadness intensity.

Najib et al. [81]

USA

11 females

25.9 (5.8)

Grief rating scale

Cross sectional

Grieving breakup was associated with altered activity in the cerebellum, anterior temporal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortex.

Luo et al. [80]

China

107 participants

56.96 (6.06)

57.9%

Loss of only child

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, ICV

Left hippocampal volumes were significantly smaller in individuals who lost their only child.

Kersting et al. [79]

Germany

24 females

30.2 (5.1)

Perinatal Grief Scale

Cross sectional

Loss of an unborn child was closely related to the activation of the physical pain network encompassing the cingulate gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, the thalamus, and the brainstem. 

Acosta et al. [87]

Germany

196 participants

24 (3.2; 19–38)

50%

List of Threatening Experiences Questionnaire

Cross Sectional

Covariates: anxiety and depression scores, attachment security and parental divorce in childhood and childhood maltreatment

Experience of at least one AL is associated with larger bilateral amygdala volumes, smaller right hippocampal volume.

Acosta et al. [86]

Germany

192 participants

24.1 (3.2; 18–40)

50%

List of threatening experience questionnaire

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, TICV

No significant association between AL and brain grey matter volume in the cerebellum.

Benetti et al. [85]

United Kingdom

32 participants

25.2 (4.3)

53.1%

List of threatening experience questionnaire

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex

Greater number of affective losses was associated with increased cerebellum volume.

Domestic conflict

Chester et al. [91]

USA

100 participants

21.61 (3.73; 18–35)

51%

Abuse within intimate relationships scale

Cross sectional

Partner aggression linked to greater connectivity between ventral and dorsal medial frontal cortex.

Men had more neural response to provocation while women showed more neural response during aggression itself.

Tomoda et al. [190]

USA

52 participants

21.7 (2.25; 18–25)

73%

Verbal Aggression Scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, sex, level of parental verbal aggression, parental education, financial stress, full scale IQ, and total GMV

Witnessing domestic violence subjects had a 6.1% GMV reduction in right lingual gyrus. And reduced thickness in visual cortex and occipital pole.

Graham et al. [89]

USA

24 infants

0.69 (0.15; 0.5–1)

33.3%

Revised Conflicts Tactics Scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age

Higher levels of interparental conflict were associated with greater activation to very angry tone of voice in the rostral ACC and subcortical structures, including the hypothalamus.

Flanagan et al. [191]

USA

20 participants

39.45 (10.27; 22–58)

55%

Revised Conflict Tactics Scale

Cross sectional

Greater activation during the relationship conflict cue compared to the neutral cue in amygdala and prefrontal cortex

Roos et al. [90]

South Africa

36 females

25.36 (6.16; 16–38)

Abuse Assessment Scale

Cross sectional

Covariates: age, alcohol use, TICV

Altered connectivity on a global and regional level in the IPV group of regions involved in cognitive-emotional control.

Daugherty et al. [192]

Spain

55 females

40.78 (12.43)

Composite Abuse Scale—Short Form

Cross sectional

Covariates: alcohol and substance use, age, education.

Volume alterations in precuneus, superior occipital, superior temporal, opercular, transverse temporal, frontomarginal, temporal occipital were observed.

  1. Peer victimisation, social isolation, affective loss, and domestic abuse contribute to the experience of social pain.