Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cortical morphometry might predict currently prescribed vs. discontinued medications in bipolar disorder, even after controlling for the cumulative dose effects: An ENIGMA mega-analysis

Abstract

Recent research suggests that brain anatomy may help identify the most effective pharmacological treatment for each individual with bipolar disorder and reduce trial-and-error prescribing. We aimed to investigate whether brain anatomy predicts whether a medication is currently prescribed or has been discontinued, as a proxy for treatment effectiveness. The rationale is that medications that provide clinical benefit without unacceptable side effects are likely to be continued, whereas those with limited benefit or poor tolerability are typically discontinued. We used T1-weighted MRI from twelve ENIGMA-BD cohorts (n = 2462; 473 individuals with BD [61% female, age 18–73] and 1989 controls) to derive regional cortical thickness and surface area and subcortical volumes. Site differences were harmonized using ComBat models fitted on controls’ data. Within cross-validation, models were trained to first adjust for cumulative dose and other covariates and then predict medication status. On test sets, current prescription (vs. discontinuation) of lithium was predicted by greater cortical thickness and reduced surface area, whereas current prescription (vs. discontinuation) of antidepressants and atypical antipsychotics was predicted by greater cortical thickness. Predictive regions for atypical antipsychotics were generally consistent across subgroups of age, gender, illness duration, and history of psychosis, and in the largest site, and differed from those associated with cumulative effects of medication on the cortex. Predictions were poor for subcortical volumes and for antiepileptic mood stabilizers and typical antipsychotics. These findings provide preliminary support that cortical anatomy may help inform future development of biomarkers for treatment selection, pending validation in longitudinal studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group Sites.
Fig. 2: Regional accuracy of the cortical thickness predictive models distinguishing currently prescribed vs discontinued lithium status, shown together with the corresponding cumulative dose effects for comparison.
Fig. 3: Regional accuracy of the cortical thickness predictive models distinguishing currently prescribed vs discontinued antidepressant status, shown together with the corresponding cumulative dose effects for comparison.
Fig. 4: Regional accuracy of the cortical thickness predictive models distinguishing currently prescribed vs discontinued atypical antipsychotic status, shown together with the corresponding cumulative dose effects for comparison.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vieta E, Berk M, Schulze TG, Carvalho AF, Suppes T, Calabrese JR, et al. Bipolar disorders. Nat Rev Primer. 2018;4:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samamé C, Martino DJ, Strejilevich SA. Longitudinal course of cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: a meta-analytic study. J Affect Disord. 2014;164:130–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crump C, Sundquist K, Winkleby MA, Sundquist J. Comorbidities and mortality in bipolar disorder: a Swedish national cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:931–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pompili M, Gonda X, Serafini G, Innamorati M, Sher L, Amore M, et al. Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Bipolar Disord. 2013;15:457–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh B, Yocum AK, Strawbridge R, Young AH, Patel R. Patterns of pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder: A GBC survey. Bipolar Disord. 2024;26:22–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Mantingh T, Pérez de Mendiola X, Samalin L, Undurraga J, Strejilevich S, et al. Clinicians’ preferences and attitudes towards the use of lithium in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders around the world: A survey from the ISBD Lithium task force. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023;11:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Bipolar Disorder: The Management of Bipolar Disorder in Adults. in Children and Adolescents, in Primary and Secondary Care (British Psychological Society, 2006).

  8. Geddes JR, Miklowitz DJ. Treatment of bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2013;381:1672–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ching CRK, Hibar DP, Gurholt TP, Nunes A, Thomopoulos SI, Abé C, et al. What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;43:56–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hibar DP, Westlye LT, Doan NT, Jahanshad N, Cheung JW, Ching CRK, et al. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:932–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hibar DP, Westlye LT, van Erp TG, Rasmussen J, Leonardo CD, Faskowitz J, et al. Subcortical volumetric abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1710–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fortea, L, Ortuño, M, De Prisco, M, Oliva, V, Albajes-Eizagirre, A, Fortea, A et al. Atlas of gray matter volume differences across psychiatric conditions: A systematic review with a novel meta-analysis that considers co-occurring disorders. Biol Psychiatry (2024).

  13. Zhang W, Xiao Y, Sun H, Patino LR, Tallman MJ, Weber WA, et al. Discrete patterns of cortical thickness in youth with bipolar disorder differentially predict treatment response to quetiapine but not lithium. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lei D, Qin K, Li W, Pinaya WHL, Tallman MJ, Patino LR, et al. Brain morphometric features predict medication response in youth with bipolar disorder: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Psychol Med. 2023;53:4083–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernardo M, Vieta E, Saiz Ruiz J, Rico-Villademoros F, Alamo C, Bobes J, et al. Recommendations for switching antipsychotics. A position statement of the spanish society of psychiatry and the spanish society of biological psychiatry. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment Engl Ed. 2011;4:150–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chakrabarti S. Treatment-adherence in bipolar disorder: A patient-centred approach. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6:399–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Öhlund L, Ott M, Oja S, Bergqvist M, Lundqvist R, Sandlund M, et al. Reasons for lithium discontinuation in men and women with bipolar disorder: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Devulapalli KK, Ignacio RV, Weiden P, Cassidy KA, Williams TD, Safavi R, et al. Why do persons with bipolar disorder stop their medication? Psychopharmacol Bull. 2010;43:5–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, GS, Moons, KGM, Dhiman, P, Riley, RD, Beam, AL, Van Calster, B et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ e078378 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.

  20. Palau P, Solanes A, Madre M, Saez-Francas N, Sarró S, Moro N, et al. Improved estimation of the risk of manic relapse by combining clinical and brain scan data. Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023;16:235–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salazar de Pablo G, Radua J, Frearson G, Young AH, Arango C, Kelleher I, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model and risk calculator for the estimation of bipolar-spectrum disorder risk in hospitalised adolescents with non-psychotic/non-bipolar mental disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03244-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Drugs@FDA: FDA-Approved Drugs. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

  23. Nath M, Gupta V. Mood Stabilizers. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Depression Resource Guides | Community Care of North Carolina. https://www.communitycarenc.org/what-we-do/clinical-programs/behavioral-health-integration/clinical-resources/depression.

  25. British National Formulary (BNF) | Pharmaceutical Press. https://www.pharmaceuticalpress.com/products/british-national-formulary/.

  26. UpToDate: Trusted, evidence-based solutions for modern healthcare. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate.

  27. Leucht S, Crippa A, Siafis S, Patel MX, Orsini N, Davis JM. Dose-response meta-analysis of antipsychotic drugs for acute schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:342–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gardner DM, Murphy AL, O’Donnell H, Centorrino F, Baldessarini RJ. International consensus study of antipsychotic dosing. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson PM, Jahanshad N, Ching CRK, Salminen LE, Thomopoulos SI, Bright J, et al. ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006;31:968–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis: II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage. 1999;9:195–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Radua J, Vieta E, Shinohara R, Kochunov P, Quidé Y, Green MJ, et al. Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA. NeuroImage. 2020;218:116956.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Solanes A, Palau P, Fortea L, Salvador R, González-Navarro L, Llach CD, et al. Biased accuracy in multisite machine-learning studies due to incomplete removal of the effects of the site. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2021;314:111313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun D, Rakesh G, Haswell CC, Logue M, Baird CL, O’Leary EN, et al. A comparison of methods to harmonize cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. NeuroImage. 2022;261:119509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Radua J, Koutsouleris N. Ten simple rules for using machine learning in mental health research. Biol Psychiatry. 2024;96:511–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Solanes A, Gosling CJ, Fortea L, Ortuño M, Lopez-Soley E, Llufriu S, et al. Removing the effects of the site in brain imaging machine-learning - Measurement and extendable benchmark. Neuroimage. 2023;265:119800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Öhlund L, Ott M, Bergqvist M, Oja S, Lundqvist R, Sandlund M, et al. Clinical course and need for hospital admission after lithium discontinuation in patients with bipolar disorder type I or II: Mirror-image study based on the LiSIE retrospective cohort. BJPsych Open. 2019;5:e101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kishi T, Sakuma K, Okuya M, Matsuda Y, Esumi S, Hashimoto Y, et al. Recurrence of mania or depression among adult bipolar patients who continued using lithium: A single-group summary meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020;40:468–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Altshuler L, Suppes T, Black D, Nolen WA, Keck PE Jr, Frye MA, et al. Impact of antidepressant discontinuation after acute bipolar depression remission on rates of depressive relapse at 1-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1252–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bertolini F, Ostuzzi G, Pievani M, Aguglia A, Bartoli F, Bortolaso P, et al. Comparing long-acting antipsychotic discontinuation rates under ordinary clinical circumstances: A survival analysis from an observational, pragmatic study. CNS Drugs. 2021;35:655–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ketter TA, Brooks JO, Hoblyn JC, Champion LM, Nam JY, Culver JL, et al. Effectiveness of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder in a clinical setting. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2008;43:13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bowden CL. Anticonvulsants in bipolar disorders: current research and practice and future directions. Bipolar Disorders. 2009;11:20–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor C, Fricker AD, Devi LA, Gomes I. Mechanisms of action of antidepressants: from neurotransmitter systems to signaling pathways. Cell Signal. 2005;17:549–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Phillips ML, Swartz HA. A critical appraisal of neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder: toward a new conceptualization of underlying neural circuitry and a road map for future research. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:829–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Abé C, Ching CRK, Liberg B, Lebedev AV, Agartz I, Akudjedu TN, et al. Longitudinal structural brain changes in bipolar disorder: A multicenter neuroimaging study of 1232 individuals by the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;91:582–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Robinson JL, Bearden CE, Monkul ES, Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D, Velligan DI, Frangou S, et al. Fronto-temporal dysregulation in remitted bipolar patients: An fMRI delayed-non-match-to-sample (DNMS) study. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:351–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schumer MC, Chase HW, Rozovsky R, Eickhoff SB, Phillips ML. Prefrontal, parietal, and limbic condition-dependent differences in bipolar disorder: A large-scale meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:2826–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Seeman MV. The pharmacodynamics of antipsychotic drugs in women and men. Front. Psychiatry. 2021;12:650904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Galbally M, Wynter K, Siskind D, Correll CU, Northwood K, Every-Palmer S. Sex differences between female and male individuals in antipsychotic efficacy and adverse effects in the treatment of schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2024;38:559–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. McDonald C. Brain structural effects of psychopharmacological treatment in bipolar disorder. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13:445–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lyoo IK, Dager SR, Kim JE, Yoon SJ, Friedman SD, Dunner DL, et al. Lithium-induced gray matter volume increase as a neural correlate of treatment response in bipolar disorder: A longitudinal brain imaging study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1743–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ochoa ELM. Lithium as a neuroprotective agent for bipolar disorder: An overview. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2022;42:85–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hozer F, Sarrazin S, Laidi C, Favre P, Pauling M, Cannon D, et al. Lithium prevents grey matter atrophy in patients with bipolar disorder: an international multicenter study. Psychol Med. 2021;51:1201–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hajek T, Bauer M, Simhandl C, Rybakowski J, O’Donovan C, Pfennig A, et al. Neuroprotective effect of lithium on hippocampal volumes in bipolar disorder independent of long-term treatment response. Psychol Med. 2014;44:507–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sämann PG, Höhn D, Chechko N, Kloiber S, Lucae S, Ising M, et al. Prediction of antidepressant treatment response from gray matter volume across diagnostic categories. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23:1503–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wu P, Zhang A, Sun N, Lei L, Liu P, Wang Y, et al. Cortical thickness predicts response following 2 weeks of SSRI regimen in first-episode, drug-naive major depressive disorder: An MRI study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:751756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sara SJ. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:211–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jacobs BL, Azmitia EC. Structure and function of the brain serotonin system. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:165–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Duman RS, Aghajanian GK. Synaptic dysfunction in depression: potential therapeutic targets. Science. 2012;338:68–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Castrén E, Hen R. Neuronal plasticity and antidepressant actions. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:259–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Castrén E, Monteggia LM. Brain-Derived neurotrophic factor signaling in depression and antidepressant action. Biol Psychiatry. 2021;90:128–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sheline YI, Price JL, Yan Z, Mintun MA. Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:11020–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Menculini G, Steardo L Jr, Sciarma T, D’Angelo M, Lanza L, Cinesi G, et al. Sex differences in bipolar disorders: impact on psychopathological features and treatment response. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:926594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Smilowitz S, Aftab A, Aebi M, Levin J, Tatsuoka C, Sajatovic M. Age-related differences in medication adherence, symptoms, and stigma in poorly-adherent adults with bipolar disorder. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2020;33:250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Karanti A, Bobeck C, Osterman M, Kardell M, Tidemalm D, Runeson B, et al. Gender differences in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder: a study of 7354 patients. J Affect Disord. 2015;174:303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Oliva V, Vieta E. Predicting the past: The risks and rewards of post-hoc findings. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025;92:21–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. De Prisco M, Vieta E. The never-ending problem: Sample size matters. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024;79:17–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Boonstra G, van Haren NE, Schnack HG, Cahn W, Burger H, Boersma M, et al. Brain volume changes after withdrawal of atypical antipsychotics in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;31:146–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dietze LMF, McWhinney SR, Favre P, Abé C, Alexander N, Barkhau C, et al. White matter microstructure in obesity and bipolar disorders: an ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group study in 2186 individuals. Mol Psychiatry. 2025;30:1770–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rivas-Fernández MÁ, Domingo-Ayllón M, De Prisco M, Fernández-Corcuera P, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Vieta E, et al. Impact of bipolar disorder increased white matter hyperintensities on white matter connectivity. Bipolar Disord. 2025;27:289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Montejo L, Sole B, Fortea L, Jimenez E, Martinez-Aran A, Martinez-Heras E, et al. Study protocol - elucidating the neural correlates of functional remediation for older adults with bipolar disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1302255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Radua J, Fortea L, Goikolea JM, Zorrilla I, Bernardo M, Arrojo M, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder. Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024;17:239–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Milken Institute/Baszucki Brain Research Fund, especially for SK and AS. The ENIGMA Working Group acknowledges the NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) award for foundational support and consortium development (U54 EB020403 to Paul M. Thompson). For a complete list of ENIGMA-related grant support, please see http://enigma.ini.usc.edu/about-2/funding/. CRKC, LN, MJYK, YI, SIT and PMT were supported by R21 MH139001, R01 MH129742, R01 MH131806, R01 AG058854, R01 MH134962. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Office Of The Director, National Institutes Of Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number S10OD032285. The IDIBAPS (Clinic) and Barcelona (FIGMAG/Clinic) MRI acquisition studies were supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00283, PI19/00394, and PI22/00261), integrated into the Plan Nacional de I + D + I and co-financed by ERDF Funds from the European Commission (“A Way of Making Europe”), CIBERSAM, and the CERCA Program / Generalitat de Catalunya and Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del Departament d’Economia i Coneixement and Departament de Salut (SLT002/16/00331, SLT006/17/00357, 2017SGR1365, 2021 SGR 01128). The CIAM group (PI: FMH) was supported by the University Research Committee, University of Cape Town, and South African funding bodies National Research Foundation (SANRF) and Medical Research Council (SAMRC); DJS from CIAM was supported by the SAMRC. The COGSBD study was supported by project grants from the Rebecca L Cooper Medical Research Foundation, the Jack Brockhoff Foundation, the Henry Freeman Trust, the Society of Mental Health Research, the Barbara Dicker Brain Sciences Foundation, and the University of Melbourne. TVR was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (GNT1088785), a Dame Kate Campbell Fellowship from the University of Melbourne, and an Al and Val Rosenstrauss Fellowship from the Rebecca L Cooper Medical Research Fellowship. JK was supported by a Swinburne University/Australian Postgraduate Award. L Furlong was supported by an Australian Rotary Health/Ian Parker Bipolar Research Fund postgraduate scholarship. SLR was supported by an NHMRC Senior Fellowship (GNT1154651) The Imaging Genetics in Psychosis (IGP) study was supported by Project Grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; APP630471 and APP1081603), and the Macquarie University’s ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (CE110001021). MJG was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT0991511; 2009-13) and an R.D. Wright Biomedical Career Development Award from the NHMRC (1061875; 2014-17). The FOR2107 cohorts (Marburg and Münster) and the Münster Neuroimaging Cohort (MNC) are part of the German multicenter consortium “Neurobiology of Affective Disorders. A translational perspective on brain structure and function,” funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG; Forschungsgruppe/Research Unit FOR2107). TK (speaker FOR2107; DFG grant numbers KI588/14-1, KI588/14-2, KI588/20-1, KI588/22-1), UD (co-speaker FOR2107; DA 1151/5-1, DA 1151/5-2, DA1151/6-1, DA1151/9-1, DA1151/10-1, DA1151/11-1), BS (FOR2107 extension project STR 1146/18-1). A full list of acknowledgements can be found here: https://for2107.de/acknowledgements/?lang=en. This work was also partly funded by the DFG SFB/TRR 393 (project grant no 521379614). The University of Galway research was supported by the Health Research Board (HRA-POR-324) awarded to DMC. We thank the participants and the support of the Wellcome-Trust HRB Clinical Research Facility and the Center for Advanced Medical Imaging, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The Groningen study was founded by EU-FP7-HEALTH-222963 ‘MOODIN- FLAME’ and EU-FP7-PEOPLE-286334 ‘PSYCHAID’. The San Raffaele site was supported by the European Union H2020 EU.3.1.1 grant 754740 MOODSTRATIFICATION. The Singapore study was supported by a research grant from the Singapore Bioimaging Consortium (RP C009/06) awarded to KS. COGSBD cohort. SK and AS were supported by funding from the Milken Institute/Baszucki Brain Research Fund. IHG was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R37MH101495). CRKC, OAA, SIT, and PMT are supported in part by the U.S. NIMH, under grants R01MH129742 and R01MH131806. The National University of Defense Technology research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20339), the STI 2030-Major Projects (2022ZD0208903), and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2023RC1004 and 2024QK2006). E.J.C.R. acknowledges financial support from the “Ramón y Cajal” Excellence Fellowship (Grant RYC2023-042763-I), funded by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICIU) and the Spanish State Research Agency (AEI, 10.13039/50110001103), and co-financed by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). Finally, we would like to acknowledge the late Professor Dan J. Stein for his longstanding leadership and collaboration within ENIGMA-Bipolar Working Group and for his invaluable contributions to psychiatry, neuroscience, and mental health research. His intellectual generosity, mentorship, and unwavering support shaped this work and the broader field in lasting ways. His scientific legacy and his kindness to colleagues continue to inspire us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

AS, LFo, OAA, CRKC, ToH, DHM, LLZ, CMcD, JR, and EdV designed the study. PMT, CRKC, LN, CMcD, and JR acquired research funding for the ENIGMA-BD Medications Initiative; for funding of site cohorts, please see the Acknowledgements. JR, AS, MARF, and LFo developed the methodology. ADG, AJ, AK, AP, AS, BB, BCMH, BS, CMcD, CRKC, DG, DHM, DJS, DMC, EJCR, EJL, EMTM, EPC, EdV, EnV, FB, FH, FSa, FSc, FSt, FTO, HJ, HT, IB, IHG, IN, JAK, JB, JR, KF, KS, LFo, LFu, LLZ, LN, LT, MA, MARF, MDS, MJG, MJYK, NA, OAA, PFC, PMT, RS, SIT, SK, SLR, SM, SMcW, SP, SS, TB, TEVR, TiH, ToH, TK, UD, YI, and YQ were involved in data collection, processing, and quality control. SK, AS, and CMcD curated the database. AS, MARF, LFo, and JR conducted the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved its final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lydia Fortea or Joaquim Radua.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

TK received unrestricted educational grants (unrelated to the present work) from: Servier, Janssen, Recordati, Aristo, Otsuka, and Neuraxpharm. EV has received grants and served as a consultant, advisor, or CME speaker for the following entities (unrelated to the present work): AB-Biotics, Abbott, AbbVie, Adamed, Aimentia, Angelini, Biogen, Biohaven, Boehringer Ingelheim, Casen-Recordati, Celon, Compass, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ethypharm, Ferrer, Gedeon Richter, GH Research, Glaxo Smith-Kline, Idorsia, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neuraxpharm, Newron, Novartis, Organon, Otsuka, Rovi, Sage, Sanofi-Aventis, Sunovion, Takeda, and Viatris. JR has received CME honoraria from Inspira Networks and Evidenze Health for machine learning courses promoted by Adamed and Viatris, outside the submitted work. All other authors report no biomedical financial interest or potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fortea, L., Rivas-Fernández, M.Á., Solanes, A. et al. Cortical morphometry might predict currently prescribed vs. discontinued medications in bipolar disorder, even after controlling for the cumulative dose effects: An ENIGMA mega-analysis. Mol Psychiatry (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03536-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03536-0

Search

Quick links