Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Optimizing social media initiatives to promote Neuropsychopharmacology (NPP) publications

Abstract

Social media provides journals with valuable opportunities to communicate with scholars and the public, and rapidly disseminate new publications. In recent years, the Neuropsychopharmacology (NPP) social media team created multiple initiatives on X (formerly Twitter) to highlight the journal’s publications and activities. We examined whether these initiatives promoted readership and identified effective posting strategies for engaging NPP’s audience by analyzing analytics from the @npp_journal X account (i.e., total engagement, URL clicks) and article accesses reported by NPP’s publisher, Springer Nature. In 2023–2024, we found that article promotions at the time of publication produced the most engagement compared to other initiatives on X; these promotions coincided with increased web traffic to articles. Posts that included an author’s X handle received more engagement compared to untagged posts, which also corresponded with an increase in article accesses. The number of URL clicks on articles featured in This Week in NPP (TWiNPP), a weekly summary of new publications launched in 2023, increased after it was rescheduled from Fridays to Tuesdays following observations that posts made earlier in the week received the most engagement. The number of accesses to articles featured in TWiNPP did not differ compared to articles published before the rollout of TWiNPP; however, this endeavor may still provide benefit given the recent reported declines in X usage. These findings support the use of X to promote NPP publications and maximize research visibility. These findings also suggest the journal may benefit from diversifying its online presence to other popular platforms to broaden engagement of its readership.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Promoting articles on X facilitates readership and traffic to NPP publications.
Fig. 2: Tagging stand-alone article promotions increases article interactions.
Fig. 3: Article visibility through X posts varies by weekday.
Fig. 4: Article access counts over time appear unaffected after the launch of TWiNPP.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

X analytics, daily-level article accesses, and article publication dates are provided as Supplementary Datasets.

References

  1. Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017;68:2037–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor M, Areia C Bluesky’s ahead, but is X a dead parrot? https://www.altmetric.com/blog/blueskys-ahead-but-is-x-a-dead-parrot/. 2025. Accessed 25 April 2025.

  3. Jordan CJ, Neigh GN, Carlezon WA Jr. Neuropsychopharmacology (NPP): relationships between online attention and citation counts. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:1513–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson DBT, Powell A, Waterman J, Hopkins L, James OP, Egan RJ, et al. Predictive value of Altmetric score on citation rates and bibliometric impact. BJS Open. 2021;5:zraa039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tornberg H, Moezinia C, Wei C, Bernstein SA, Wei C, Al-Beyati R, et al. Assessment of the dissemination of COVID-19-related articles across social media: altmetrics study. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e41388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaghjiani NG, Lal V, Vahidi N, Ebadi A, Carli M, Sima A, et al. Social media and academic impact: do early tweets correlate with future citations?. Ear Nose Throat J. 2024;103:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshimura R, Grant MC, Gardiner MD, Wade RG. Disseminating hand surgery research using social media: the relationship between altmetrics and citations. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46:740–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ladeiras-Lopes R, Baciu L, Grapsa J, Sohaib A, Vidal-Perez R, Bohm A, et al. Social media in cardiovascular medicine: a contemporary review. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2020;1:10–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Parwani P, Martin GP, Mohamed MO, Hajeer A, Nwaokoro M, Narang A, et al. Relationship of altmetric attention score to overall citations and downloads for papers published in JACC. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:757–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sorba EL, Staartjes VE, Serra C, Regli L, Alamri A, Rabiei K, et al. Promotion of a neurosurgical academic journal on social media: a 1-year experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;165:3573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Widmer RJ, Mandrekar J, Ward A, Aase LA, Lanier WL, Timimi FK, et al. Effect of promotion via social media on access of articles in an academic medical journal: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2019;94:1546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Betz K, Giordano M, Hillmann HAK, Duncker D, Dobrev D, Linz D. The impact of Twitter/X promotion on visibility of research articles: Results of the #TweetTheJournal study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024;50:101328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fox CS, Bonaca MA, Ryan JJ, Massaro JM, Barry K, Loscalzo J. A randomized trial of social media from Circulation. Circulation. 2015;131:28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koetsier J Post-Musk Twitter: At least one stat is up. 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/10/17/post-musk-twitter-at-least-one-stat-is-up/. Accessed 17 May 2025.

  15. Tenbarge K, Collier K X sees largest user exodus since Elon Musk takeover. 2024. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/x-sees-largest-user-exodus-musk-takeover-rcna179793. Accessed 17 May 2025.

  16. Van Eperen L, Marincola FM. How scientists use social media to communicate their research. J Transl Med. 2011;9:199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf JM. The multipurpose tool of social media: applications for scientists, science communicators, and educators. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2017;39:75–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Costas R, Mongeon P, Ferreira MR, van Honk J, Franssen T. Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1:771–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teoh JY, Mackenzie G, Tortolero L, Rivas JG. Social Media Analytics: What You Need to Know as a Urologist. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6:434–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Veletsianos G, Kimmons R, Belikov O, Johnson N Scholars’ temporal participation on, temporary disengagement from, and return to Twitter. First Monday. 2018;23. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.8346.

  21. Vidal Valero M. Thousands of scientists are cutting back on Twitter, seeding angst and uncertainty. Nature. 2023;620:482–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pollett S, Rivers C. Social media and the new world of scientific communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2184–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu Z, Gianvecchio S, Wang HSJ. Detecting automation of twitter accounts: are you a human, bot, or cyborg?. IEEE Trans Dependable Secur Comput. 2012;9:811–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ye YE, Na JC, Oh P. Are automated accounts driving scholarly communication on Twitter? a case study of dissemination of COVID-19 publications. Scientometrics. 2022;127:2151–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miranda R, Garcia-Carpintero E. Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. J Informetr. 2018;12:1015–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu DY, Hughey JJ. Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article. Elife. 2019;8:e52646.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. Altmetric scores, citations, and publication of studies posted as preprints. JAMA. 2018;319:402–04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zissette S, Gautam A, Krumholz HM, Ross JS, Wallach JD. Altmetric attention scores and citations of published research with or without preprints. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2424732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen BK, Custis T, Monteggia LM, George TP. Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49:757–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Xie Y. Is a picture worth a thousand words? an empirical study of image content and social media engagement. J Mark Res. 2019;57:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moran G, Muzellec L, Johnson D. Message content features and social media engagement: evidence from the media industry. J Prod Brand Manag. 2019;29:533–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim Y, Lee J, Yoo JJ, Jung EA, Kim SG, Kim YS. Seeing is believing: the effect of graphical abstracts on citations and social media exposure in Gastroenterology & Hepatology Journals. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37:e321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Batool K, Niazi MA. Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

HHA Thorpe completed this project as part of an NPP Editorial Internship. The authors thank the teams at NPP, Springer Nature, and ACNP for their assistance and feedback. We would especially like to thank Taylor Custis and Uta Hauptfleisch from Springer Nature for providing article access counts.

Funding

HHA Thorpe, LR Trambaiolli, and BK Chen received stipends as part of their roles with NPP. The other authors have no applicable funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HHA Thorpe performed data analysis and visualization, and drafted the manuscript. HHA Thorpe and BK Chen collected X analytics. LM Mayo, HHA Thorpe, LR Trambaiolli, and BK Chen implemented social media initiatives on X. All authors edited and approved the manuscript prior to publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Briana K. Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors have roles at NPP. HHA Thorpe and LR Trambaiolli were Editorial Interns in 2024, LM Mayo is the Social Media Editor, LM Monteggia and TP George are Principal Editors, and BK Chen is the Special Projects Manager.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorpe, H.H.A., M Mayo, L., Trambaiolli, L.R. et al. Optimizing social media initiatives to promote Neuropsychopharmacology (NPP) publications. Neuropsychopharmacol. 50, 2072–2078 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02244-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02244-7

Search

Quick links